 |
|
|
|
 |
cabledigital
tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Melbourne
|
|
|
You should see a doctor!
| quote: | Originally posted by Mad for Brad
some of the biggest rap hits used the akai sampler and at the time it had a lower bit depth. The result was a somewhat more crunchy sound. It is also in so many tracks that probably some of your favourite tunes use it. Every mix down to 16 bit uses it. It is everywhere. You just don't know what you are doing and you have a shitty mixer. The problem is you, not the effect.
even the fader in the hands of an idiot can be deadly. |
Thanks for your uneducated valued judgment but it is not valid... try again idiot!
___________________
http://soundcloud.com/cabledigital
|
|
Dec-13-2010 05:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
orTofønChiLd
Everything is illuminated

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Miami
|
|
|
Dec-13-2010 05:20
|
|
|
 |
 |
cabledigital
tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Melbourne
|
|
|
Man over board!
| quote: | Originally posted by Mad for Brad
that is your rebuttal ? It isn't valid because you think it is wrong? Quit wanking and do a fucking search you kangaroo molesting twat. Bit crushing is bit reduction. One of the most important elements in audio production and a common tool used all over the place probably as much as that fucking cher effect.
Every single cd available for purchase lets just say in the last 10 years has "bit crushing " going on. The Akai MPC60 , the tool that pretty much made Rap , guess what, only had a bit depth of 12. Bit reduction once again.Every
The problem is that you don't know what the fuck you are doing with your shitty mixer. The effect is just an algorithm commonly used for audio in an artistic way.
And don't even bother with the uneducated low blow bs. I'm without a doubt the smartest person you've had the luxury to talk with in a really long time. Unfortunately , you are one of the daftest. I suppose the funniest part is that all those Vengeance samples in your track , well they are fucking coated with bit crushing. Itis pretty much the genre's cliche effect. Now fuck off. |
I'd rather someone else tell me how shit I am, not here to argue or be the smartest tech guru. stop your crap! I am a label trying to promote artist you schmuck!
___________________
http://soundcloud.com/cabledigital
|
|
Dec-13-2010 07:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
Stu Cox
Supreme smackaddict

Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
|
|
|
There's a big difference between using bit reduction to fit specific hardware (i.e. "I've recorded it at 16/24-bit but my sampler can only handle 12") and a DJ effect designed to drop the bit depth down as far as 2 bits.
And yes, bit reduction as an effect was probably first used to give certain sounds a crunchy retro sound in studio production, then someone just decided it would be a good idea to put it in DJ FX boxes... it's really easy to make, so why not eh?
As with any effect, it's best used sparingly and subtly IMO. With most effects you can make them more subtle by being careful with your wet/dry mix, but having your wet/dry at half-mast with a bitcrusher can sound a bit odd. Another way to keep it subtle is to only apply it to 1 channel when you've got 2 playing - e.g. use it to crunch up one track as you remove it from the mix.
It can sound quite cool just quickly sweeping out all of the bits across the last bar or two at the end of a phrase, then flicking straight back to full bit depth at the start of the next phrase when a bassline comes in or something, but again - use sparingly.
At the end of the day, if you don't like it, you don't have to use it!
___________________
Stu Cox | 

|
|
Dec-13-2010 07:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
cabledigital
tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Melbourne
|
|
|
Most appreciated
| quote: | Originally posted by Stu Cox
There's a big difference between using bit reduction to fit specific hardware (i.e. "I've recorded it at 16/24-bit but my sampler can only handle 12") and a DJ effect designed to drop the bit depth down as far as 2 bits.
And yes, bit reduction as an effect was probably first used to give certain sounds a crunchy retro sound in studio production, then someone just decided it would be a good idea to put it in DJ FX boxes... it's really easy to make, so why not eh?
As with any effect, it's best used sparingly and subtly IMO. With most effects you can make them more subtle by being careful with your wet/dry mix, but having your wet/dry at half-mast with a bitcrusher can sound a bit odd. Another way to keep it subtle is to only apply it to 1 channel when you've got 2 playing - e.g. use it to crunch up one track as you remove it from the mix.
It can sound quite cool just quickly sweeping out all of the bits across the last bar or two at the end of a phrase, then flicking straight back to full bit depth at the start of the next phrase when a bassline comes in or something, but again - use sparingly.
At the end of the day, if you don't like it, you don't have to use it! |
Thankyou for your advice, it has given me inspiration. I am going to use it sparingly. At least you have understood the question. You are spot on, have a nice day 
___________________
http://soundcloud.com/cabledigital
|
|
Dec-13-2010 09:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zak McKracken
Trance
Registered: Jun 2003
Location:
|
|
|
great thread lol. the effect you talk about suck, and i think daft punk where among those who made it popular in edm as an effect. robot rock is a prime example.
|
|
Dec-13-2010 12:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
PivotTechno
senseless

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Citizen, World
|
|
|
Dec-13-2010 14:18
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:38.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|