http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/...&src=sp#s218859

just outside Chicago

cool pics

___________________
. . .. . .. . . . .. . .

WOW, that place is awesome.

___________________

My Set Archive - MY BLOG

That seems strangely under-priced to me...

___________________

> S u s h i p u n k . P h o t o g r a p h y <

quote:

Originally posted by shaw That seems strangely under-priced to me...

I guessing it's because of only having 4 bedrooms & 3 bathrooms. Most 5000 plus sq foot houses have 5 or 6 bedrooms around here.

But that aside the house does look bad ass except for the master bathroom. And the area it's located in is a wealthy wooded area just north of Chicago.

or they are hoping for higher bids.

___________________
. . .. . .. . . . .. . .

quote:

Originally posted by shaw That seems strangely under-priced to me...

Thats because it doesnt include the price of the car. 1.5 mil for the house, another 10 or so for the car, thats where they get you.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Moongoose Thats because it doesnt include the price of the car. 1.5 mil for the house, another 10 or so for the car, thats where they get you.

thats funny.. but still that ferrari couldn't be worth more then 40,000 today, i saw one on autotrader the other day that i wanted to pick up for shits and giggles.. proably cost me another 100g's to get to work.

From Wiki

quote:

At the time of filming, the original 250 GT California model was worth $350,000.[5] Since the release of the film, it has become one of the most expensive cars ever sold, going at auction in 2008 for $10,976,000.

If youre looking for a more expensive ferrari, theres the 250 GTO that goes for around 15 mil at auctions and thats about it THe GT California is one of the most expensive cars in the world If you saw one for 40k it was probably a replica or the owner is immensly stupid and doesnt know what he has in his garage in which case you should immediately buy it for 40k, sell it and transfer 10% of the profits to me as my commision for alerting you on the easiet way to turn 40k into 10 mil in the world

___________________

I swear i found a GTO for around 30,000$

but i found this one just looking quick glance.. maybe im missing something int he fine print

http://www.autotrader.ca/a/FERRARI/...00511285634847/


i know its not the same but yeah lol CHEAP ferrari none the less.

quote:

Originally posted by Moongoose From Wiki If youre looking for a more expensive ferrari, theres the 250 GTO that goes for around 15 mil at auctions and thats about it THe GT California is one of the most expensive cars in the world If you saw one for 40k it was probably a replica or the owner is immensly stupid and doesnt know what he has in his garage in which case you should immediately buy it for 40k, sell it and transfer 10% of the profits to me as my commision for alerting you on the easiet way to turn 40k into 10 mil in the world

quote:

Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit http://www.autotrader.ca/a/FERRARI/...00511285634847/ i know its not the same but yeah lol CHEAP ferrari none the less.

You're mixing up Magnum PI with Ferris Bueller.


I know it moves for the pornstache but come on.

___________________
. . .. . .. . . . .. . .

quote:

Originally posted by jonSun I guessing it's because of only having 4 bedrooms & 3 bathrooms. Most 5000 plus sq foot houses have 5 or 6 bedrooms around here. But that aside the house does look bad ass except for the master bathroom. And the area it's located in is a wealthy wooded area just north of Chicago. or they are hoping for higher bids.

I know the area. Just seems to me that a 5500 sqf designer house on that type of lot should be quite a bit more, even after devaluing it for the fame. Even down here, that's a mid-range price for a run-of-the-mill custom build that size on a 1-2 acre lot.

___________________

> S u s h i p u n k . P h o t o g r a p h y <

nvm. Somehow I got it in my head that it was on a much bigger lot than that. Doesn't seem all that far off, then. That picture did its job.

___________________

> S u s h i p u n k . P h o t o g r a p h y <