Equipment doesn't really matter, although you probably want a very decent symphonic product.

It's a very crowded market - every other producer in FM mentions trying to do this. I'd imagine you'd need to intensely network.

___________________
https://soundcloud.com/butlerrichard

quote:

Originally posted by Richard Butler Equipment doesn't really matter, although you probably want a very decent symphonic product. It's a very crowded market - every other producer in FM mentions trying to do this. I'd imagine you'd need to intensely network.

yeah been doing my home work and as you rightly say plenty of people out there all ready doing the same thing.

networking seems a tricky thing to get my head round but was more worried about being screwed over not owning my software.

sounds bad from my side i know but it is how most people start.

thanks for the advice

quote:

Originally posted by stewart.m networking seems a tricky thing to get my head round

There was a BBC documentary about our top art School, Goldsmiths college, and at the end the head was interviewed and asked what he thought about the low proportion that actualy go on to make a living from art.

He said, in terms that less than 2% would make really good money, and they were always the ones who netwroked and hussled the best, and definitely not the ones with the most talent per see.

An old American saying comes to mind;

'He who whispers down a well will never make as many dollars as he who climbs a tree and hollars'.

___________________
https://soundcloud.com/butlerrichard

quote:

Originally posted by stewart.m i was told you can make money from it and tv now here is my problem the software i have installed on my pc is not mine mainly freeware and samples from the net. so do i have to go and buy all my samples and software before i can make a few bucks or is it a to higher risk?

For starters, let's get some clarification because the answer will depend on your meaning of "freeware" - if you are actually talking freeware and samples that were made freely available by the developer, it's as simple as checking their websites or emailing the developer for any use restrictions. If you're talking cracked software, then, yes, you'd better get legit before trying to make money from your clients. This would be particularly true with samples, because if someone recognizes the sample in a commercial and checks it, your clients aren't going to be too happy.

___________________
cryophonik.com | facebook | soundcloud

Sonar Platinum | Ableton Live 9 | Logic Pro X | Access Virus TI2 Keyboard | Kurzweil PC3X | Nord Lead 4R | NI Maschine

quote:

Originally posted by cryophonik For starters, let's get some clarification because the answer will depend on your meaning of "freeware" - if you are actually talking freeware and samples that were made freely available by the developer, it's as simple as checking their websites or emailing the developer for any use restrictions. If you're talking cracked software, then, yes, you'd better get legit before trying to make money from your clients. This would be particularly true with samples, because if someone recognizes the sample in a commercial and checks it, your clients aren't going to be too happy.

well yeah i agree it's not something i want to do on a professional level.
in my mind i was thinking my style of making music was better suited to tv advertising and movies and radio.

i dont really use cracked software anymore i mainly use samples and midi plus soundfonts.

in a nutshell I'm looking to make 10 or so tunes and use them to show case my work on web sites youtube ect ect is this something that's deemed not the way to go or completely dodgy.

ie can you still get fucked for it event tho no money has been passed ect?

As someone who works in the industry with a lot of major big name composers, I can tell you now, it's a long hard slog to get anywhere near the point you could pay your rent from it.

I know some seriously talented guys, who studied and graduated from the best music schools in the world (Juiliard, Berklee Boston, Royal Conserv. etc) and they barely scratch a living, with maybe one or two of them getting lucky through years of making contacts and being in the right place at the right time.

Because of this, even small paying gigs like local TV commercials can have 200 composers all competing for the same job. To give you an idea of how the big commercials are: One of my mates was of the "lucky" 150 composers selected with a chance of doing 4 x 30 second superbowl ads. He was given 48 hours to compose 4 completely different pieces of music
(and I mean totally diverse from each other). He managed to do it and submitted. Got chosen for the final 10 in which he had to tweak (to new video edit) 3 of them and write one completely new one due to a change of theme. Another 2 days work.

He made it to the final 5 for submissions but didn't get the gig meaning at least 4 days hard work completely unpaid, and on to the next project.

Now bear in mind, this guy went to those schools, top of his class, clasically trained since 4 years old, sub composed for 3 years for one of the biggest names in film score and has even has done medium budget film scores, is incredible at marketing and networking, yet he still just scratches a living out of the dirt.

Not trying to put you off, but every so often, someone comes on to TA with a post like "Hey, I've heard the money is great in film/TV/commercials etc and I'm going to get me some of that pie".

It's so unbelievably more difficult than you could imagine unless your best mate is a film producer or owns a music library, and even then, you need to be fucking talented to get anything out there.

...Or have a publisher that can throw in a good word for you (somehow I mixed up this topic with another one and posted this in the wrong topic earlier). The good publishers have access to important people in other industries in need of music. Not just film.

Some random dutch band ended up in the latest FIFA game that way. It's a long shot and requires a bit of luck of course, but if you're on the right track getting access to these publishers won't be that hard. It can open a new world full of opportunities or get you in one of those battle royales RANN posted about.

___________________

Storyteller Website | Storyteller @ Facebook | Storyteller @ Beatport | Storyteller @ Soundcloud | Stephen J. Kroos - Europa (Storyteller Remix)
Anthony Mea - Get It On (Storyteller Remix)

quote:

If less is more think about how much more more would be. -Frasier

Curiously I've had 3 different people ask me to do some 'small' movie soundtrack work recently.

I strongly suspect it'll come to nothing and involve no money whatsoever.

___________________
Soundcloud

I'd guess you'd probably make more money if you can get local gigs frequently and regularly.

___________________
Tranceport is the best album ever....

There is nothing wrong with being musically diverse.

My Soundcloud

quote:

Originally posted by DJ RANN As someone who works in the industry with a lot of major big name composers, I can tell you now, it's a long hard slog to get anywhere near the point you could pay your rent from it. I know some seriously talented guys, who studied and graduated from the best music schools in the world (Juiliard, Berklee Boston, Royal Conserv. etc) and they barely scratch a living, with maybe one or two of them getting lucky through years of making contacts and being in the right place at the right time. Because of this, even small paying gigs like local TV commercials can have 200 composers all competing for the same job. To give you an idea of how the big commercials are: One of my mates was of the "lucky" 150 composers selected with a chance of doing 4 x 30 second superbowl ads. He was given 48 hours to compose 4 completely different pieces of music (and I mean totally diverse from each other). He managed to do it and submitted. Got chosen for the final 10 in which he had to tweak (to new video edit) 3 of them and write one completely new one due to a change of theme. Another 2 days work. He made it to the final 5 for submissions but didn't get the gig meaning at least 4 days hard work completely unpaid, and on to the next project. Now bear in mind, this guy went to those schools, top of his class, clasically trained since 4 years old, sub composed for 3 years for one of the biggest names in film score and has even has done medium budget film scores, is incredible at marketing and networking, yet he still just scratches a living out of the dirt. Not trying to put you off, but every so often, someone comes on to TA with a post like "Hey, I've heard the money is great in film/TV/commercials etc and I'm going to get me some of that pie". It's so unbelievably more difficult than you could imagine unless your best mate is a film producer or owns a music library, and even then, you need to be fucking talented to get anything out there.

thanks for the reply rann it seems like a hard nut to crack tho i dont see myself as a fully fleged composer not by a long shot.

i was inspired by friends working at my local radio station some of them have gone on to making a living from there music and efforts.

to me it's more of a project wile maybe earning a few buck to play with on the side.

im more about this guy

quote:

Originally posted by Storyteller ...Or have a publisher that can throw in a good word for you (somehow I mixed up this topic with another one and posted this in the wrong topic earlier). The good publishers have access to important people in other industries in need of music. Not just film. Some random dutch band ended up in the latest FIFA game that way. It's a long shot and requires a bit of luck of course, but if you're on the right track getting access to these publishers won't be that hard. It can open a new world full of opportunities or get you in one of those battle royales RANN posted about.

interesting now trying not to sound dumb what publishers are we talking about do you mean news papers ect or something totally different?