 |
|
|
|
 |
function t
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2011
Location: Peoria, USA
|
|
|
Hey Sylvannas,
Thanks for the feedback! It means a lot to me 
1) hehe...I added that reverse kick sound at the suggestion of a DJ friend of mine. There's also one at 7:01. I originally had the kick just skip that first beat to kind of mix things up a bit, but he thought it might sound cooler to have that reverse sound. I'll be honest and say I'm not sold on it, either. One thing I'm going to look at is cutting everything except the vocals out on beat one give that little pause/skip effect some more prominence. If that seems like too much of a gimmick, I might just revert to the standard (forward) kick drum
2) I'm not too fond of the entire intro (everything before 1:40). I've gone through about 6 different iterations of the intro, and this is the best thing I've come up with so far. I've tried everything from vocal chops (though this song doesn't have very good vocals for a chop, IMO)to some more prominent elements. Do you have any suggestions? I definitely agree that it needs some work...I've spent the past two days looking at the intro alone and I still don't like it 
3) Thanks for the compliment on the breakdown Do you like the buildup into the chorus, as well? I spent a while working on that buildup, and I think it's pretty decent. I just want to make sure that the main drop at 4:36 has enough drive and weight to be impactful.
4) How did it sound to you, quality-wise? Like I said, I haven't touched the master channel for any mastering touches, but I want to make sure that it sounds technically good. Any clashing, clipping, or audio quality issues that you noticed?
THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR FEEDBACK!!!
-Function T-
|
|
Nov-29-2011 17:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
Dj Pyster
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Albany, Ny, USA
|
|
|
The Vocals sound nice and clear on my monitors, very nice punchy kick, but I think the basslines can be turned up just a little as well as the sustaining bass note around 3:20 could be turned up a little bit (But this is my own opinion). But overall this is very good work, great quality.
___________________
Pyster's Myspace
|
|
Nov-30-2011 00:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
EddieZilker
This is the dance.

Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Marijuana Sex Camp
|
|
|
Holy white noise, Batman! - OR - It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a cliche'.
Not to knock you, because your ability seems rather apparent, but this sounds like it was made in 2008 and the white noise is just so... well, over-used, overly prominent, and passe'. I agree that the bass-line is a little under-played and the highs, particularly with the white noise, are a little harsh. The synths, at times, had some interesting textures but it felt like you were relying on the noise to pick up the slack when you were in a corner on the synth-work.
I'm not trying to be brutal, at all. I'll say I even respect you for this first showing. It's just not very original. It does show that you're far along on the learning curve, though. Keep at it.
___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012
|
|
Nov-30-2011 02:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
function t
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2011
Location: Peoria, USA
|
|
|
Hey Eddie,
Haha, you can't offend me...I came looking for feedback and you gave it! It's up to me to take that and do what I feel with it 
Seriously, though...thanks for the feedback! I appreciate your compliments, as I haven't been producing for very long. I'll agree with you here: white noise is fairly cliche. I've been a DJ far longer than a producer, so I can tell you I'm a bit behind on the trends. I was looking for a way to build a little energy in those sections, and I know that white noise has been used for exactly that purpose. I think a cymbal crash sounds cheesy, a long filter sweep sounds too noisy, and a sidechained white noise sounds cliche. Do you have any suggestions for an alternative to create a bit more energy in tje absence of the noise? I've looked around and I can't seem to recreate a good alternative...perhaps that means I should try something new, then, right?
You also mention the noise in the lead synth...you're right. I've edited the filter in Sylenth1 to mix in a noise oscillator when it gets pretty open. That was an intentional choice to build a little grit throughout the phrasing. I'll experiment with lowering that noise a bit a see what I can come up with.
|
|
Nov-30-2011 02:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
EddieZilker
This is the dance.

Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Marijuana Sex Camp
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by function t
Do you have any suggestions for an alternative to create a bit more energy in tje absence of the noise? |
A lot of that's going to come with experience as you learn how to balance stuff out and develop better keyboard skills along with improving your percussion section and progression. You're not the first person to use white noise as a crutch and you won't be the last. I'll say that being a DJ gives you a considerable advantage over a lot of producers because you can actually hear what works along with what you like and steal ideas, as needed for your own work. Working on other people's remixes doesn't hurt, either.
I will say that anytime you change a few things in the track, as it's progressing, that will build tension - unless you do something completely off the wall. My fellow Michigander, Kruma, did a really good job of making what is ostensibly a drastic change with a fairly good result. If you want an example of what I'm talking about, listen to where he moves from a chord progression into heavy solo-type work.
Don't be afraid to change multiple tracks at once. Don't just tweak a filter on a single synth-track, for instance. Change a bunch of stuff. If you're opening the filter on one synth track, draw another part down to accommodate that - just an example. There's a million different ways to go, provided what you're doing lets your listener follow.
___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012
Last edited by EddieZilker on Nov-30-2011 at 06:00
|
|
Nov-30-2011 02:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
function t
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2011
Location: Peoria, USA
|
|
|
Hey Eddie,
Thanks for the comments! I agree, there is a plethora of things that could be done. I'm still trying a bunch of stuff...we'll see where it goes.
As for your comments about changing multiple tracks at once, I'm assuming you're talking about automating a variety of parameters at once. In the track I've posted, there are currently a total of 37 channels and 91 total automation curves...so I'm in complete agreement that many elements should be in motion at the same time...rarely should a track be flat at all.
Like I said, I'll play around with things and see where it goes. Either way, thanks a lot for taking the time to comment! If you've got any other suggestions or something randomly comes to mind, let me know!
THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP!!!
-Function T-
|
|
Nov-30-2011 04:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
EddieZilker
This is the dance.

Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Marijuana Sex Camp
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by function t
Hey Eddie,
Thanks for the comments! I agree, there is a plethora of things that could be done. I'm still trying a bunch of stuff...we'll see where it goes.
As for your comments about changing multiple tracks at once, I'm assuming you're talking about automating a variety of parameters at once. In the track I've posted, there are currently a total of 37 channels and 91 total automation curves...so I'm in complete agreement that many elements should be in motion at the same time...rarely should a track be flat at all.
Like I said, I'll play around with things and see where it goes. Either way, thanks a lot for taking the time to comment! If you've got any other suggestions or something randomly comes to mind, let me know!
THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP!!!
-Function T- |
I think you've got the basic ideas, down. What I'd do is treat the white noise like a placeholder for your actual intent and see if you can't work out something else as you work that noise out of the track, entirely. Where it's almost hitting like a hi-hat, for instance, something else can go there. Where you're building up for a transition with it, erase that, listen to what's going on around it and ask yourself what you want to be hearing, instead.
___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012
|
|
Nov-30-2011 04:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
function t
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Nov 2011
Location: Peoria, USA
|
|
|
Sounds good...I'll post back with any updates in the next few days. Final exams start this week, so I won't have much time to play. The time away from the track may actually be for the best...sometimes a fresh pair of ears on a track gets more work accomplished!
THANKS AGAIN FOR THE HELP!!!
|
|
Nov-30-2011 04:40
|
|
|
 |
 |
rubyliping
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Öйú
|
|
|
Anyways, I'm working on a new remix of the incredible Sun & Moon by Above & Beyond. It's currently in a "rough draft" form, but it's complete. You can listen to the current version here:beach wedding dresses
designer wedding dresses
|
|
Dec-01-2011 01:39
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:53.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|