Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Lelystad, Netherlands
i7 beats the shit out of it.....
___________________
Analogue Mastering
Esoteric sound for the discerning ear
Mar-01-2012 11:12
tehlord
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Windsor
Well to put the question into perspective it's for a pal of mine who's doing score work almost exclusively.
There's a 2009 Mac Pro 8 core with 3 SSDs, 4TB storage and 16GB RAM with a 30" Apple Cinema Display for £1600 up for grabs, or a new build PC with an i7 and similar specs for similar money.
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Lelystad, Netherlands
He would need to do his homework on what XEON was used that that timeframe, but can tell you now, current i7's will be like 8x times at fast and 1600GBP buys you a hell of a i7 system
___________________
Analogue Mastering
Esoteric sound for the discerning ear
Mar-01-2012 11:26
tehlord
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Windsor
Hmmmm, looking here it shows that the 3.2ghz Xeon's are about 80% as quick as all but the latest i7s, but I really have no idea how real world those benchmarks are
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Lelystad, Netherlands
quote:
Originally posted by tehlord
Hmmmm, looking here it shows that the 3.2ghz Xeon's are about 80% as quick as all but the latest i7s, but I really have no idea how real world those benchmarks are
Originally posted by tehlord
Well to put the question into perspective it's for a pal of mine who's doing score work almost exclusively.
There's a 2009 Mac Pro 8 core with 3 SSDs, 4TB storage and 16GB RAM with a 30" Apple Cinema Display for £1600 up for grabs, or a new build PC with an i7 and similar specs for similar money.
That model is what everyone uses. You could also sell it in one year for almost the same. Those benchmarks just don't translate to specific tasks. Andre value of a 1 year old pc is nothing. People are lining up or 3.1 - 4.1 Mac pros
Not sure how pounds convert to dollars when buying computer stuff in uk but that system with no monitor or ssd at 1400 would be sold the same day.
But even itch those results the 3.2 is as you said 80%. Remember you have 2.
Last edited by Looney4Clooney on Mar-01-2012 at 14:44
Mar-01-2012 14:34
tehlord
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Windsor
quote:
Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
That model is what everyone uses. You could also sell it in one year for almost the same. Those benchmarks just don't translate to specific tasks. Andre value of a 1 year old pc is nothing. People are lining up or 3.1 - 4.1 Mac pros
Not sure how pounds convert to dollars when buying computer stuff in uk but that system with no monitor or ssd at 1400 would be sold the same day.
But even itch those results the 3.2 is as you said 80%. Remember you have 2.
Yeah it's a bit of a bargain, it works out to about $2400 but Macs are much more expensive here than there in the first place.
A 15 inch 2011 Macbook Pro is even faster than a 8 core Mac Pro.
___________________
Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity
Mar-03-2012 17:31
Looney4Clooney
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2010
Location:
faster at what ? The mac pro , its bandwidth , ram addressing and cache makes it a much more formidable computer for audio. Faster ? no . Able to do more, yup.
I mean have you people actually tried to do similar things ?
I own a 2011 Macbook pro , a 2009 MAC PRO . a 2010 MAC PR0 and the laptop could not handle a 25% of what the towers do. It isn't all about cpu cycles. IN fact the 2010 is spec'd to be twice as fast as the 2009 model but in practice, they are identical. Benchmarks are theoretical. In practice, doing the same things, the benchmarks just don't correlate as much as you think. Unless you are doing benchmark type stuff like batch retouching child pornography. Those tears need to really dazzle off the page.