|
Re: What to do with Africa?
| quote: | Originally posted by Maaz
In my opinion, white people should "clean up" all the mess they've done in the continent and leave. We like to think that we're developed and that we should teach other civilizations to behave like us, but they were a lot better without our "knowledge". We caused unnecessary wars and hunger, did it help them?
|
I agree with you, except I do not think "we" should "clean up" as this will most likely do even more damage. In my view we should seal ourselves (the west) from the continent and let the people find their own way through civilization development - both when that road takes them through the ups and the downs.
On a different note, the logic "our ancestors hurt Africa, we must make amends" suffer from two faults IMO. First of all there's the question of whether guilt can be inherited: if your dad kills mine and then dies, am I entitled to kill you? And where to draw the line - crimes dating back 100 years? 500 years? 20000 years? In the latter case, we could argue that the people of Syria/Iraq is really to blame for all the crap that is taking place in the world today, and should pay for everything.
Furthermore, there's the question of whether you *can* make amends. The people living in Mongolia today is hardly in a position where they can pay for what Djenghis Khan did years ago, but is incompetence in administering wealth as a nation an excuse for not making amends?
The second fault connected to the aforementioned logic, is whether or not the ancestors of the west today really is solely to blame for the state of Africa today? "The white man" did awful things elsewhere in the world, but not all places are still plagued by wars on a regular basis. And according to one of my history books African tribes were responsible for plundering and enslaving other Africans during the colonial period - "the white man" was certainly enticing them but does that necessarily mean he is solely to blame?
|