 |
|
|
|
 |
zarathustra
0x40000000
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary
|
|
|
Re: The Landing on the Moon
| quote: | Originally posted by Jiggilo
Who here thinks we really landed on the moon. Give me your thoughts, videos, any info on it. I think its all bs |
I absolutely think it happened for real. Where did they get the moon rocks from then? They probably wanted to set up some way to spy on the Soviets from the moon while they were up there too.
Could you tell me why you think it's BS.
|
|
Dec-22-2002 05:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
Delete
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: NZ
|
|
|
I absolutely don't give a damn, because I believe that there are more important issues down here on earth, than thinking about something quite distant from me or my life.
|
|
Dec-22-2002 07:13
|
|
|
 |
 |
Acid John
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Close south suburb of Chicago, illinois, usa.
|
|
|
apparently u saw the "FOX" special too.
yea, theres a lotta evidence they showed. like:
different angles of shadows...like there were 2 light sources, from completely different angles. like it was on a set.
evidence that pics from the moon were doctored. (eg, the little photo lens crosshairs are under some parts of stuff...which is impossible, and therefore, doctored pix
inconsistency in light. pictures taken of one of the dudes steppin outta the lander...the spacesuit was bright white, but the sun was behind the lander and casting a shadow.
moon driving/walking vs regular walking. both look like regular walking/driving on earth, just played at half speed
a training flight of the moon lander (or atleast one of them) while still on earth. it was very very shaky, and eventully neil armstrong had to eject and allowed it to crash. with even less gravity on the moon. it would be even more dangerous.
2 pictures which were said to be "x" many miles apart had the exact same backdrop, and landforms
in an airial picture taken overhead of area 51, there is a portion of it that has craters, and a buncha crazy shit that looks like it belongs on the moon.
and finally (of what i remember), the moon is outside of some kinda radiation belt around the earth. every other space mission other than moon missions has taken place within the belt...so no harm would come of the astronauts. but for a moon mission, the astronauts would have to pass thru this belt. radiation so strong, you would need 12 ft. of lead plating around u so it wouldnt harm u. it would have killed any parson that passed thru it.
there was a lot more evidence that points that it was faked...but i dont remember anything else
|
|
Dec-22-2002 09:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
nrjizer
vive le deep

Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Bumfuck, GA
|
|
|
Ok. That FOX thing? Absolute bullshit. A bunch of cooked up nonsense. Ill try to adress some of its claims off the top of my head.
First: About the astronauts appearing lit even though they were in the shadow of the spacecraft. How can this be? There can only be one source of light right? Thats the sun! But wait a sec... how do we see the moon at night? The very simple answer to this is that the materials in the moon dirt are extremely reflective. The light bounces off the moon straight onto the astronaut.
Next, the issue of the module not kicking up a huge crater when it took off. The rocket has something like 10,000 lb's of thrust, but leaves a tiny crater after it launches off. Simple, theres no atmosphere on the moon. There is no air or anything else to displace, which would make no wind that could kick up dust or leave a huge crater. With no atmosphere, that thrust is limited to the area directly under the rocket. When you divide that thrust into the area directly under it, it comes down being a very small amount of force (dont know the exact math). Theres little gravity on the moon too, so the escape velocity is very small.
About the video appearing to have been taken in the same spot, this has to do again with the fact that there is no atmosphere. Standing and looking, you wont be able to tell if your seeing a 20 foot wide rock a mile away, or a mile wide rock 20 miles away, because theres no haze of the atmosphere to judge it on. This all comes into play somehow, I forget exactly how.
Theres more to disprove the fox show, but im tired and cant think of the rest right now.
Two more things tho:
The moon landing was at the height of the cold war. The Russians and Americans probably had radar and whatnot everywhere. The russians most likely followed all the USA moon missions carefully. Dont you think they would have made a gigantic stink about it if they even had the slightest thought that the landings were faked?
There is a reflector on the moon, that had to have been hand placed. There would be no way to drop it remotely into its spot. It reflects a laser shot at it back to earth constantly. Thats how we figured out how quickly the moon is moving away from us (forget just how quick).
___________________
NEW MIX [Feb/March 2008]
|
|
Dec-22-2002 10:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
zarathustra
0x40000000
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary
|
|
|
I think that if NASA was going to make a hoax, they wouldn't omit details like double shadows and telephotolens crosshairs.
Like I said. It was so they could establish posts on the moon to spy on the Soviets. They're probably still up there now.
|
|
Dec-22-2002 10:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
Acid John
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Close south suburb of Chicago, illinois, usa.
|
|
|
hey...im just "reporting" what i remembered....i never said i believed in that bullshit! i think we really did land on the moon
u make it seem like i am following these facts like they were my bible.
|
|
Dec-22-2002 11:31
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|