|
In all honesty, if you were to compare the discussions in this forum to those of any other on the entire board, you would find that there is less flaming and more civility on this forum than on each the others. Even when a passionate disagreement arises, it usually gets sorted out on its own, without the need for a moderator to step in and close the topic. I agree, if the arguments start to get personal, then it's time to get heavy-handed, but - in all seriousness - I don't think I'm seeing that any more. There were a few (taking care not to mention any names ) who didn't seem interested in holding down a civil conversation when this forum was first created, but I've noticed an improvement from all of them. While there is still going to be passionate bipartisanism in the forum (it's politics, you've got to expect some feistiness) so long as there's an argument in there, and no personal insults, I fail to see the problem.
As for the issue of having the same topics appear over and over again, as Mental Exodus and trancaholic said, it's only because they're relevant and presently topical. While I agree that the Isreali/Palestinian threads have degenerated into mindless conflict on a few occasions (much like in real life unfortunately ) the Iraqi debates have generally been of a high quality, with lots of facts and figures being passed back and forth. The point is, the good discussions (which outnumber the "bad" discussions by a pretty good ratio imho) just wouldn't be possible in the Chill-Out Room. Could you imagine trying to discuss the Iraqi conflict in there? It'd be impossible. That's why we created this forum, and that's why it needs to stay, even if the mods are worried about how "out of control" it's getting. Perhaps we need mods who are willing and able to visit this forum more often in charge? Nothing against the four who moderate it now, but given the amount of time they must spend moderating the C/O Room, Music Discussion Room and the Regional Forums, it couldn't be easy for them to moderate this one as well (Blik's the only one I ever see posting in here, and that's usually quite rarely). I say, give moderator powers here to Izzy, TranceGiant and anyone else who's already a mod and visits regularly, and hope that everything stays in check. I don't think that there's much of a problem here - and perhaps this "problem" can't be solved be extra moderation - but if we could work out some rules about what does and does not constitute acceptable posting, and to get these regulars to ensure that these rules are enforced, I reckon we will see a marked improvement.
Sorry about the lack of paragraphing, but I'm just spooling all this off the top of my head. 
| quote: | I do have a bad conscience for not participating any more in this section, as I was one of the verbal proponent for its creation. The reasons are two-fold. First, my education is nearing its completion and takes extreme amounts of time, presently. Second, somehow my family affairs seem to have gone mad over the last six months. When asked to deal with hospitalizations, burglaries, suicide and such, I have found that I do not have the energy reserves for investigating global political issues and philosophical arguments on the level of detail they require, and hence have abstained from partaking in the debate around here.
Anyway, I mention these reasons only to assure you that my absense has nothing to do with lower quality of the discussions around here. Things are looking more bright for me now, though, so I hope that I can start participating again soon. |
Hey, I was wondering where you had gotten to! Sounds like you have a lot to deal with at the moment, and I know all to well just how difficult it is to concern yourself political issues when you face more immediate problems in your own life, but I hope you come through it all okay though. Hope to see you posting regularly again soon - and that ought to raise the intellectual level of this board a peg or two. 
___________________
http://eschatonnow.blogspot.com/
|