|
Well, here are some of the criteria I use:
1. First and foremost, what's important is if the product is a good tune. You can't be a good remixer or a good remix if you're producing garbage.
2. Quality relative to the original: that is, is the product only good because the tune being remixed was already good? Or does the remixer make the tune a lot better than it was originally.
3. Innovation: does the track sound too similar to the original? It could be very good, but if it's hardly different than the original, then the remixer hasn't done much himself.
Probably the best remix in my opinion in the last year or so was Altitude - Altitude (S.H.O.K.K. Remix). The original was a very decent, listenable melodic trance tune. It was highly innovative (they only sound similar during the breakdown). It was a big improvement over the original in terms of a huge gain in energy with almost no dropoff in melodic beauty. And of course the tune itself was absolute quality.
But ultimately you should choose whatever criteria you think makes sense. After all, it's only your opinion.
Cheers,
Arbiter
|