THIS HAS BEEN LIFTED FROM A THRED I RESPONDED TO A WHILE AGO AND HAS BEEN REVISED TO BE POASTED HERE I HOPE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS.
Srry bout the caps.

Tha mastah plan and its involvement with Iraq.

This goes beyond BUSH,THE USA,Iraq, Iran, Sadam, terrorism and most other buzz words designed to throw u off thru the ancient art of mass misinformation. Minus TWO.
and they are OIL AND New World Gov

Oil is a non-renewable energy source, and what required a billion years to create 3.2 trillion barrels of useable oil has taken 110 years to reduce to 1.8 trillion barrels. The planet's oil supply is its economic lifeblood. As this diminishes, so does the economic system in which the world's people live. As the economic conditions erode, instability arises, and if left unchecked, chaos ensues.

GUESS WHAT WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE EAST FOR GUYZ!(PUTTING THE NWO ASIDE)
UNTIL WE CHANGE OVER TO SOME OTHER FORM OF POWER OIL IS THE ONLY MAJOR ONE. NOW GUESS WHAT MAJOR WORLD POWERS DO TO MAJOR WORLD SOURCES OF POWER THAT ARE DWINDELING????? THEY CONTROLL THEM FOR ALL THE RIGHT REASONS.

NOTE: people have said that in anywhere from 25 to 80 years thers going to be no more oil for earth at reasonable prices. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR AMERICA AND EUROPE? THE MOST ENGERY/POWER HUNGRY NATIONS WHO CREATE MOST OF THE WORLDS GARBAGE????.

WE GO WHERE THE OIL IS UNTIL WE CAN USE SOMETHING ELSE.

Of course there will be more pressure to create a world government in the future that isn't the joke that the UN is now. However sustaining our way of life comes first on the list. This has little to do with JUST America and Bush and more to do with the democratic nations as a whole. America is used as a military force as it has a large patriotic population who will support wars with a drone like mentality when attacked and has the mass media play on there heart strings. That is there role in the democratic world. That is what this comes down to. Its painfully simple and very easy to throw in allot of smoke and mirrors into the mix to throw off people who disagree with the plan. This misinformation tactic has been used to subdue the masses for many years and it is working to this day as people take all the little things like turning the united Arab nations into a democratic government overnight seriously. PLEASE GIVE ME A BREAK!! This isn't going to happen over night with a few cruise missiles and an occupation it takes a life time of influence and control from all the major players. So naturally it looks like we don't give a shit about them cuz initially we don't. The change doesn't happen like that were not like brothers here we are like CAPITALISTS we control thru influential, militaristic and economic tactics. THATS THE WAY WE FUNCTION WE PLAY OF EACH OTHER LIKE A WELL NIT SOCIETY OF LEECHES.

Now there are many arguments for not fighting. Pro-life, pro-choice, political parties and there objectionable intentions, lack of evidence for WMD's and links to terrorism, people arguing the possibilities of productive change or the lack of them and so on.

All of these arguments are nothing in defense against the plan of creating a New World Government which i have mentioned above. basically the democratic nations have decided that it is time for a considerable adjustment in the world governments and there lack of unity. This adjustment is to unify all people under one global government. Regardless of how good or bad the mentality of the people maybe suited for such. Why are we doing this?? its very simple. There are very big and potentially devastating events that are happening to the world. To give u an idea, Aids and other illness, over population, WMD's, loss of oil, Change over to a new energy source just to name a few. These things stand in the way of our goals of survival. The only way to deal with these issues in time is to create a Global government which will be able to respond with considerable effort and the efficiency needed to ensure survival.

What does this have to do with good old Sadam Husain !?!?!?!? The Arab states and territories can pose as a considerable road block on this plan if they were to ever get there act together and become allies instead of fighting among each other as they have a large controlled population and enough oil to fuel/fund a decent sized army. Not to mention strangle the supply of it to the rest of the world which is in need. The possibility of them joining the democratic world is slim to none as they hold there traditions/religious government very close. They also have been victim of many colonialist country's attacks/occupations which support there current semi/isolationist mentality. This war might be taken to other countries as well but I personally think that even the semi/communist semi/democratic china will switch over with the right social and economic influence which we have been developing for years. Just think about it where does all the labor and tech products come form and why ????

So for the sake of replacing Dictatorships and communist governments with democratic ones to ensure survival FOR EVERYONE and the fact that Everyone wants control over the oil we are going to war and there isnt much u can do the governments dont care about what u think because you haven't been kept up to date with the plan in the first place so your arguing only what u know about and what will happen in the short term to the innocent never considering what's really going on here. REMEMBER WEE COULD ALL END UP DEAD IF WE DONT FORM ONE SOCIETY.

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO RESPOND TO THIS ID LOVE TO HEAR WHAT U GUYS THINK.

___________________
Todays youth have desacrated music with the popification of all generes. FOR SHAME.

MUSIC GURU - 2002.

Last edited by Mental Exodus on Feb-25-2003 at 02:37

I'm all for a world government.
Not gonna happen for a long time if not never.
It'll take a huge event for the process to even begin to start.

quote:

Originally posted by montie I'm all for a world government. Not gonna happen for a long time if not never. It'll take a huge event for the process to even begin to start.

I have heard people in the know personally tell me that 60 years is long enough to see some definite results of what has been in the works for decades. Thank about it, how many large democratic nations are there now?? Even China is starting to behave like a Democracy in some ways. So how hard would it be for these existing countries to turn the rest to democracy’s one at a time? After which it’s a simple task of strengthening and remodeling the U.N. right?

___________________
Todays youth have desacrated music with the popification of all generes. FOR SHAME.

MUSIC GURU - 2002.

The world government would be a nice thing if it was created in a proper way. However, it is a question whether all the countries are willing to give up their national sovereignity for a higher cause. You see how hard it is for Europe to unite. Although that is mainly Britain's fault.

The problem with oil is that regardless of its resources being depleted, the big oil companies are still claiming that oil is the best energent and are actively working against nuclear power which is the only real alternative. If it weren't for those companies and for their involvement in american government, most of the world would be running on nuclear power instead of oil. Besides, we wouldn't have to worry about pollution and greenhouse effect. Since we know all about nuclear power, there won't be a total catastrophe when the oil runs out, cause we'll just switch to nuclear power. It is sad however that we have to wait for oil to run out to turn to better/cheaper/more efficient sources, and we have to do that just because of the corporate interests.

___________________
1+1=10

quote:

Originally posted by Vesa I personally don't believe that human nature ever permits such a change, even though it would be critical for the survival of the mankind.

Nice post Vesa, what do u mean by this tho ? I would imagine that people would love it considering all the benefiets.

___________________
Todays youth have desacrated music with the popification of all generes. FOR SHAME.

MUSIC GURU - 2002.

I used to be interested in subjects like this in school, so I learned a little...

Basically, the problem with the oil is a big problem, but not as big as we thought... there are many new ways of producing electricity and getting around the need for fossil fuels, but the reason they are not becoming mainstream is for 'bush & co.' rich oil producers that don't want it to end now. Hydrogen cars etc are ready for production on large scale, but oil is such an essential part of the economy its not easy to remove it now..

But i'm a little hazy on the subject to be honest and objective, so guys please fill me in if i'm wrong!

Political factors stop the progres of alternative fuel methods.

On the middle east agenda... I don't think the arab countries are so united as you think. On some issues, like Israel, they are united like protons and electrons, but on other issues, they usually end up fighting or not agreeing. Oil is no exception. Even if Iraq goes down (G-d willing!), there are secret reasons why the arab world doesn't want it to happen (for 1, Iraq is a spearhead for the terrorist industry... providing bombs, chemicals, and everything else under the sun to all the groups in iran, syria, palestinian authority etc...) and the arab world uniting against US by stopping oil production? Last time I checked the major way for all these arab countries to make money is by exporting their oil! It's all they have!!... well syria has a 5 billion dollar drug industry... but thats different!

A world government I think would not be able to maintain any level of calm around the world, as we have so many people with so many opinions, everyone uniting under 1 man/woman is laughable in my opinion! We have so many countries as it is, and more are breaking apart form each other then getting together.. unless you meant like a more meaningful UN?? I think the UN is crap, and I feel so good seeing all you guys thinking the same thing!

So if the UN is crap, how much better could a bigger and more powerful version be? for me, being from canada, but with a jewish connection to Israel, I see it as a way for the world gov't to destroy anyone who it opposes... kinda like the imperial forces in star wars.... 1 way to unite us all??

If you ask me what will bring world peace, its nothing new. Everyone realizing that G-d created us, and wants to see us finally realize this, and put G-d above ourselves, and do what we do today, but have G-d in our minds and we unite on the level of us being his children, and work it from there..

thats the only way. G-d by any definition is perfection. So for those who are athiests, we can still agree, if you say that perfection, in its perfect harmonious way is the ultimate goal that we can try hard to reach, and that is what we must do. (also we must have a clear universal definition of perfection! i say the definition is: lacking nothing. what do you guys think?? :rolleyes

now the next goal if we can think like this, is how can we hammer out a method to bring this idea into reality... What laws are needed? what ways of running our lives? What is demanded of us to bring perfection of ourselves???

So while one would see this as trying to emulate the ways of G-d, one who doesn't believe in G-d can see it as a way to emulate perfection, because ultimately, G-d is perfection, and we all ultimately try to 'better ourselves'. so why not seriously try to go the next step and perfect ourselves!!!!!

Shlomo Eliyahu Baron!!

I like the religus touch Shlomo, However i never said the Arab countrys are allied in any way, i said "if they did". No matter what happens with forming large govenments there are always people who wont like the deal or feal that it goes against there beliefs or lyfestyle. At the end of the day we have to ask ourselves if we live in semi/issolated countrys never working together for the sake of regecting change and claiming that "evil" greedy peps will take advantage or do we work together hang the expense and adapt change and mold new mentalities in order to get allong especialy when it comes to religion. I peronsonaly think peps take that stuff WAY to seriously and expecialy scince there have been tonz of religions come and go over time. I mean weve got howmany people saying there religion is the ONLY one and are willing to bound on anyone who says otherwise? please give me a break. Religion is good for many peps but fighting over it, or "defending yourself" against outside influences that are compleatly unstopable is kinda childish.

___________________
Todays youth have desacrated music with the popification of all generes. FOR SHAME.

MUSIC GURU - 2002.

good topic, mental exodus. i've cut and pasted my previous reply to u, and am adding some more.

yes. wars these days r fought 4 oil. the next stage will b war 4 water. and little is done to takle the problem at it's roots. the problem is that too much power is in the hads of the oil industry, the small elite that owns it, and the governments who r in their pockets.
now people like bush c oil as an essential part of capitalism. cutting oil usage, he says, is against the interests of america. it would damage industry, the stock-market, and ultimately the whole western way of life.
i disagree. capitalism is built on growth. the expansion of markets, the continuous increase of investment, production and consumption. oil provides much of the energy to achieve this, so removing it, according to those who have little imagination, would undermine the whole system. but oil is a limited resource, and were it truely fundamental to the system that takes infinity as a prerequisite to it's existance, capitalism would b short-lived.

so, the substitution of oil, and this is what many can't see, is fundamental to capitalism. and it's possible.
not only is it possible, it would b a benefit. energy efficiency and new, cleaner sources of energy, new materials and their use have an enourmous economic potential. research, production (or reproduction?)... a whole new industry for capitalism to thrive and grow on. oil could then b used in much better ways: for example with the oil burned in a second in a motorcar u can produce 1000 t-shirts.
a few people would loose some of their wealth: oil tycoons and the odd sheiik, but few people will cry 4 them.
the EU has begun to make it's first tentative steps in this direction, and i strongly encourage them to further these efforts.
this is another reason why bush and his administration are seriously wrong. if europe undertakes this new path with more zeal, it might well return to being the main world-power in 50 years time. some US industries r aware of this, but all efforts r stiffled by an overpowerful oil industry.
oh, and let us not forget the environmental issue. i'll write about when i have a few more minutes

vesa makes some similar point in discussing the global power structure at the moment. the way i see it, no matter what religion, political or economic structure a region or the world has had, there have always been individuals, or small groups of individuals, who have come out on top at the expense of others. and when revolutions overthrew these, they just ended up substituting an elite whith another. maybe it's just the perverse way of evolution: the people best equipped for the environment they live in comes out on top. in humans, the best equipment is knowledge. many people use their power in a good and charitable way, but not all. many r far to selfish.

so, were a new world government to b created, i have little reason to imagine that things would go in a different way.
that's for power structures. then there's the fact that far too many people don't have the means or the ability to accept other views and ways of life. all wars and conflicts, large or small, have been fought over religion or resources, often with one as an excuse to the other. despite the technology we have today, where u can chat to a person on the other side of the world, or on the moon for that matter, not everyone has access to these means, and even many of those who do remain impregnable to outside influence. they stay stuck in their old ways and remain aggressive towards what they see as 'the other', resulting in more or less continuous conflict. look at many african or asian states, look at the middle east or northern irland.
no. i have little faith in humans. not in individuals: some people achieve extrodinary things: great acts of charity, invention, genius, and so on. but for each of these there is a negative example, and there is always someone who benefits over others.

so, in my humble opinion, if there ever will be a new world government, a truely globally just one, star trek style, it certainly won't b for a long time yet.
that doesn't stop us from trying, of course

___________________
NFA

quote:

DROP PILLS NOT BOMBS

quote:

Originally posted by NFA so, in my humble opinion, if there ever will be a new world government, a truely globally just one, star trek style, it certainly won't b for a long time yet. that doesn't stop us from trying, of course

How long is long?? 60 years? 600?

___________________
Todays youth have desacrated music with the popification of all generes. FOR SHAME.

MUSIC GURU - 2002.

quote:

Originally posted by Mental Exodus How long is long?? 60 years? 600?

don't know. the question is: will it take longer than it takes for us to destroy ourselves? or will it happen b4 that, ensuring our survival?

___________________
NFA

quote:

DROP PILLS NOT BOMBS

quote:

Originally posted by NFA a few people would loose some of their wealth: oil tycoons and the odd sheiik, but few people will cry 4 them.

Actually this is untrue, I watched the American controlled media conglomerate the other day and they were talking about Kuwait...

Kuwaits entire economy is based on oil, the end of oil, would mean pretty much absolute poverty for many people in Arab countries that sell oil around the world.

Dont get me wrong, alternative energy is desirable for the world, and ultimately necessary cause oil will run out, but countries that have oil as a resource would lose a lot, & the hundreds of millions of people that live in them as well.

___________________
Current fav albums

DNA, kick me up
Protoculture, Circadians

quote:

Originally posted by Verona^My Actually this is untrue, I watched the American controlled media conglomerate the other day and they were talking about Kuwait... Kuwaits entire economy is based on oil, the end of oil, would mean pretty much absolute poverty for many people in Arab countries that sell oil around the world. Dont get me wrong, alternative energy is desirable for the world, and ultimately necessary cause oil will run out, but countries that have oil as a resource would lose a lot, & the hundreds of millions of people that live in them as well.

in countries like kuwait, the emirates, or saudi arabia yes. it's not always the case though: look at nigeria. virtually nobody benefits from the oil industry. quite the opposite, the people have been kicked off the land.
countries that depend on oil should start to use their wealth to diversify their economy, as oman is, or else they'll b in 4 a nasty surprise one day.

___________________
NFA

quote:

DROP PILLS NOT BOMBS