Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Definition Time: Peace
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
biznology
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2000
Location:
Question Definition Time: Peace

OK,

i hope that this reaches everyone on some similar level. i fear that this will, yet again, turn into a Middle East discussion of various sorts- but i dont intend it that way. i *guess* you could provide examples from said region, but given the worlds history of conflict and war you could most likely avoid talking about anything that has happened in the last 1 year or so...

but: onto my question.

there has been much debate on these forums regarding war and peace. the problem with these discussions is that we all have our own (and often legitimate) ideas and conceptions of what both entail.

some see 'war' as a possible solution while others say that 'peace' should be the goal.

in regards to 'peace' i want to know what 'peace' is!

-is peace simply avoiding physical combat/conflict?
-is peace avoiding *any* conflict or confrontation?
-does physical violence stem from violent or conflicting ideals/beliefs whether physical or verbal?
-is peace relative?
-is peace only attained on a universal level? (macro vs micro)
-has peace ever actually existed (examples)? again (macro vs micro)
-has peace ever solved a conflict and then lasted for a discernable amount of time in that region? (think Ghandi or MLK Jr.)
-how would one go about promoting peace without also promoting conflicting ideals?

...maybe others understand what im saying or have further questions!

________________


personally, i feel that peace is something that may be somewhat unrealistic. that does not mean that i am not a peaceful person, or do not stive to be intelligent, well informed and peaceable to other individuals. it just seems to me that in some circumstances where confrontation can be avoided it is more harmful than beneficial. sometimes people need to be pushed over some esoteric edge to get real results or realize a change that needs to occur-

i feel there have been peaceful people that have gotten successful results with their methods. the teachings of Thoreau, Ghandi and Martin Luther King Jr. all point to this. the problem is that often once the small battles are won, violence once again emerges. Ghandi was a hero for his peacful demonstrations, yet now that India is free of British control they threaten nuclear war on Pakistan. MLK Jr. was another influence, but even he couldnt escape an assassins bullet.

and while there have been peaceful people, they have only been viewed as peaceful when there was a violent agressor to counter with. if everyone was peaceful, how would anyone judge peace? what would it become then? and could it last?

humans are complex animals and whether you delve into Calvanist, Hobbseian, or other Social contract theories (among millions of other topics/ideas) no two people will think alike. this is why everyone in the world doesnt subscribe to our love of trance! if thats the case how can everyone 'unite for peace' when we are all so different and conflicted on a smaller, personal level?


any help|?


___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

Old Post Mar-27-2003 13:20  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for biznology Click here to Send biznology a Private Message Add biznology to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Nrg2Nfinit
ItaloDiscoAddict



Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Ottawa

peace is LIVING in harmony and smoking the ganj

Old Post Mar-27-2003 14:03 
Click Here to See the Profile for Nrg2Nfinit Click here to Send Nrg2Nfinit a Private Message Add Nrg2Nfinit to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
TranceGiant
randomly disappoints



Registered: Jun 2001
Location: (Strudel)-City that never sleeps

Excellent thread!
Just had to say that right now..my contribution will folllow later, though


___________________
"Those are my principles, if you don't like them... well, I have others.”

Old Post Mar-27-2003 14:13  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for TranceGiant Click here to Send TranceGiant a Private Message Visit TranceGiant's homepage! Add TranceGiant to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
biznology
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2000
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
peace is LIVING in harmony and smoking the ganj



what does 'living in harmony' entail? what does that even truly mean? harmony with nature? with other people, plants, music, what?

and what happens when the ganj runs out?! those are some of the most angry, violent moments ive ever experienced around your average, ardent dope smoker|


___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

Old Post Mar-27-2003 15:06  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for biznology Click here to Send biznology a Private Message Add biznology to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
victor
P A R T YY? coz we gotta!



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal

i'd define peace on a micro level as having respect for others and an OPEN MIND, freedom of speech and expression, and a polite and educational exchange of ideas through debates, forums , etc...

but on a macro/ international level the definition of peace gets skewed as you pointed out... one explanation could be having healthy relations with everyone... now u ask what are healthy realtions and how do you maintain them???

i guess answering the first part is simple but to answer the second part... we have to go a little back in history to understand sources of conflict between peoples in present times... also world factors like social and political factors have a say in maintiaining relations between countrys ... i therefore agree with you on the point that peace really doesnt exist on a macro level atleast...

but as long as ppl can keep an open mind i think that ppl on a personal level can be at peace..., like for e.g i was totally anti war at first but after browsing through this forum and talk to a lot of ppl on the subject i admit that there are strong points for and against the issue...

peace is realtive too.. for eg if aliens were to attack the earth (lol) then we'll all unite to fight a common enemy... at that point we'd all be at peace with one another... so i guess peace only exists when there exists or is potential conflict.

kind of an oxymoron ... any other ideas???

PS :: i havent at all answered your questions but these are just my views on peace...

Old Post Mar-27-2003 21:11  India
Click Here to See the Profile for victor Click here to Send victor a Private Message Add victor to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
PeacefulWarrior
aDdiCtEd to cHUnKy bEaTs



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Boulder, Colorado

To have peace and to live peacefully means not to create antagonism. Peace is not an ideal. To me, an ideal is merely an escape, an avoidance of what is, a contradiction of what is. “Peace is a state of mind, not a state of the nation.” To have peace, we have to love, and we have to begin not to live an ideal life but to see things as they are and act upon them. This can only come about through an inward revolution of the individual self.


___________________
sig edited: no political imagery allowed. please reref to the sig guidelines

Old Post Mar-27-2003 23:17  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for PeacefulWarrior Click here to Send PeacefulWarrior a Private Message Add PeacefulWarrior to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
biznology
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2000
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by PeacefulWarrior
To have peace and to live peacefully means not to create antagonism. Peace is not an ideal. To me, an ideal is merely an escape, an avoidance of what is, a contradiction of what is. “Peace is a state of mind, not a state of the nation.” To have peace, we have to love, and we have to begin not to live an ideal life but to see things as they are and act upon them. This can only come about through an inward revolution of the individual self.


but how is this affected when others choose not to, or símply refuse to follow a similar mindset? it seems to me that to follow your POV one could be taken advantage of by those that wont 'love' you and may freely antagonize for their own (tho possibly limited) gains. does that make sense?



thanks for the response victor, i didnt specifically call for people to address everything that i had said, as that could be difficult. i dont even know the answers- i just wanted to get people thinking, and maybe get them to pose similar problems or issues with the debate.

it gets old listening to polarizing opinion/heresay on very limited subjects when this forum could be used to truly discuss everything related to politics, et al|


___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

Old Post Mar-28-2003 15:09  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for biznology Click here to Send biznology a Private Message Add biznology to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
victor
P A R T YY? coz we gotta!



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal

hahaha yeah...

good thread tho...

Old Post Mar-28-2003 15:51  India
Click Here to See the Profile for victor Click here to Send victor a Private Message Add victor to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
PeacefulWarrior
aDdiCtEd to cHUnKy bEaTs



Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Boulder, Colorado

quote:
Originally posted by biznology
it gets old listening to polarizing opinion/heresay on very limited subjects when this forum could be used to truly discuss everything related to politics, et al|


i definitely agree


___________________
sig edited: no political imagery allowed. please reref to the sig guidelines

Old Post Mar-28-2003 22:28  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for PeacefulWarrior Click here to Send PeacefulWarrior a Private Message Add PeacefulWarrior to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Mental Exodus
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Can
Be Cool!

I agree with bizz that total peace cannot be achieved as I feel violence is a very natural human reaction. People have said that the development of ones mentality or the inner self is a possible solution. Well this is key I feel it must be coupled with physical conditions. By this i mean a point of relative global peace can be achieved by creating a global gov which can impose population/economic controls. I strongly believe that over population and the resulting competition for basic needs plays the largest reason for conflict globaly.


___________________
Todays youth have desacrated music with the popification of all generes. FOR SHAME.

MUSIC GURU - 2002.

Old Post Mar-29-2003 01:56  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for Mental Exodus Click here to Send Mental Exodus a Private Message Visit Mental Exodus's homepage! Add Mental Exodus to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
occrider
Traveladdict



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York

quote:
Originally posted by biznology
it gets old listening to polarizing opinion/heresay on very limited subjects when this forum could be used to truly discuss everything related to politics, et al|


Yes we need more threads that deal with abstract political debate rather than relating everything to what is happening today. Some of the best threads I've read have been offtopic subjects such as absolute truth, astronomy, physics, the mentality of ordinary people in the nazi regime, etc (ironically all in threads about Iraq/US). It's a shame that these forums are being pumelled with current events that all but drown out every other issue that we can be discussing.

I agree with Biz and mental in that peace is an idealistic objective that cannot be achieved at this point in human evolution. No matter how amicable, rational, and open-minded you are, situations will always arise that demand conflict. On the micro-level and in the macro/global sense. It is within human nature to strive for self-preservation. In order to achieve self-preservation we adapt to become competitive, aggressive, and controlling. In doing so we establish dominance and assurance of self-preservation. If any philosophers are out there, I think that Thomas Hobbes said it best in the leviathan:

quote:

if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies, and in the way to their End, . . . endeavor to destroy, or subdue one another . . . If one plant, sow, build, or possess a convenient Seat, others may probably be expected to come prepared with forces united, to dispossess, and deprive him, not only of the fruit of his labor, but also of his life, or liberty . . .

So that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel. First, Competition; Secondly, Diffidence; Thirdly, Glory.

The first maketh men invade for Gain; the second, for Safety; and the third, Reputation. The first use Violence to make themselves Masters of other men's persons, wives, children, and cattle; the second, to defend them; the third, for trifles, as a word, a smile, a different opinion, and any other sign of undervalue, either direct in their Persons, or by reflexion in their Kindred, their Friends, their Nation, their Profession, or their Name.

Hereby it is manifest, that during the time men live without a common Power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called War; and such a war, as is of every man, against every man . . . state of nature will return.


The famous saying that everybody attributes to hobbes is that the life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. I agree that the current state of mankind is accurately described by that statement. I don't think that we are destined for oblivion and violence however. I think that only through GLOBAL education, can we can rid the world of many intolerances, hatred, misconceptions, and ignorance. That won't happen in my lifetime though. Probably not for another 10 lifetimes follow at least.

Old Post Mar-29-2003 04:07  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for occrider Click here to Send occrider a Private Message Add occrider to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
biznology
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2000
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
...

The famous saying that everybody attributes to hobbes is that the life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. I agree that the current state of mankind is accurately described by that statement. I don't think that we are destined for oblivion and violence however. I think that only through GLOBAL education, can we can rid the world of many intolerances, hatred, misconceptions, and ignorance. That won't happen in my lifetime though. Probably not for another 10 lifetimes follow at least.


hmm...this global education though would be entirely relative as well. you would have to either teach everyone the same thing - which could be seen as brainwashing and *not* education, or adapt your education culturally. it would be difficult-

but in regards to Hobbes, the modern(not-post) view of history was of progression - that things got better. therefore Hobbes theory was criticized and adapted by social contract theorists, etc. are they less appropriate?

(our) post-modern views in regard to theory and history have changed how we look at our world, but does that mean that history or the world has changed? who is to assume things will get 'better' with time? who is to say the opposite? |


___________________
'That's like telling a Kodiak bear to stop fcking older men.'

Old Post Mar-30-2003 15:57  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for biznology Click here to Send biznology a Private Message Add biznology to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Definition Time: Peace
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): [1] 2 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackHelp Me Id This Song! [2002] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackOdessi Feat. Maria Nayler - Over Again (Original Club Mix) [2006]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:38.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!