ok so on a vinyl...

lets say you could only have 2 tracks...would you rather have

2 original artist songs

or

1 original tune and a remix of that tune

or

would you rather have two seprate releases one with 2 originals and the other with 2 remixes

floorfiller stop making stupid polls

___________________

1 Original work and 1 Remix of that work

Or

floorfiller stop making stupid polls


Having hard time choosing between those two...

I’d rather have four tunes on the one disc.

quote:

Originally posted by Spin Doctor I’d rather have four tunes on the one disc.

Now that would be a overkill..

quote:

Originally posted by Spin Doctor I’d rather have four tunes on the one disc.

yeah i suppose i could do that...i just want the quality to be the best.

1 original and 1 remix.

___________________
xeqtor

floorfiller stop making stupid polls

i just wanted to get a sense of what the consumer wants...is that so wrong

Overkill, why? I’m f****** fed up of paying for a tune twice over because of different mixes. You can generally fit two tunes on one side of a vinyl if they aren’t ridiculously long epics, so why can’t we have one 12” with four tunes, regardless of whether they be other mixes or other productions by the artist? Profit seems to be the answer to that question.

rar, madness!

1 original & 1 remix please. Second tunes by the same artist on vinyls tend to be pretty poor.

___________________

"I expect to pass through life but once. If therefore, there be any kindness I can show, or any good thing I can do to any fellow being, let me do it now, and not defer or neglect it, as I shall not pass this way again."

Two original works. Obviously if the b-side is an afterthought or something the producer dug out of the depths of his studio then it's not going to be a quality release, but all the same.