 |
|
|
|
 |
ESMdjm600
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location:
|
|
|
id sell the tech and get the 2 cdjs cuz those techs aint gonna become the next standard among cdjs so ull always end up havin a learnin curve if u start gettin gigs, besides the cdj1000 are considered better all around ne way
|
|
Jun-12-2005 06:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
dj_lane
Timeless

Registered: Jul 2004
Location: MNTA #7 /// AvidTechno.com
|
|
|
by downloading... you mean legally, right? 
___________________
 
www.Avidtechno.com
- Trance Challenge Afterparty -> [Lane Pelovsky, Squiggles, MBC...]
- Jokers -> [Lozar, Lane Pelovsky, Speakerfuker & More] -> 06/04
- Spectrum -> [JT, Clear, Steve Ohs, Lane Pelovsky] -> 07/30
- Addiction @ The Quest -> [Kenneth Thomas, TylerC/DanielK, Lane Pelovsky] -> 9/30
|
|
Jun-12-2005 07:14
|
|
|
 |
 |
ESMdjm600
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location:
|
|
|
good answer weasil.... i know of tempest, he works kinda undercover for the riaa, he got me into a world of shit a while back...
|
|
Jun-12-2005 15:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
ESMdjm600
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location:
|
|
|
Jun-12-2005 19:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
b20bigcam
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: fairfax, va
|
|
|
i would go with the cdj-1000. i have both the cdjs and the techs. dont get me wrong i love my techs but cdjs are so accurate and easyer to use. .02% tempo adjustment is just nasty. u can make PERFECT mixes. also the sound quality is just unbeliveble.
|
|
Jun-13-2005 02:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
ESMdjm600
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2004
Location:
|
|
|
yea i agree in that i think the techs suffered under all that "first generation" b.s.
|
|
Jun-13-2005 17:54
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:11.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|