 |
|
|
|
 |
THE_Chris
needs a new CT

Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Ireland
|
|
|
Aug-30-2005 15:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lira
Ancient BassAddict

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Brasilia, Brazil
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Yes well I am sure you support many bans that will make the resistance strengthen. |
You're actually right. It's incredible that once you have a rule set, some people will blindly disobey, often just for the sake of it. I'm for it because it could lead to two main scenarios:
- It could succeed. Given the nature of internet and how it works, simply banning the sites in the United Kingdom would be no use. If anything, users seeing some "rape porn" could be sued, for example.
- It could fail, and the ban would end up becoming as pathetic as censorship on computer games and whatnot.
These being two ideal consequences, the result would eventually be in-between. Most likely, there would be some success (if any) and some failure. Some would defend either the status quo or the ban, acting mainly on emotion, but there would be discussion, which matters more than just leaving it untouched.
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Basically I see this as an infrigment on a persons right to do and show whatever they want. |
Now that's a utopian vision. Being a social being, it's absurd to believe that any individual would have the plain right to do (and show) whatever they want. There are limits to this liberty, such as a common well-being. That's why crimes exist, for example. Once a person engages on an act that might harm another individual, the right of doing such thing is open to dispute.
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
I mean it is only the internet and the people viewing it are doing it without a gun pointed to thier head. |
However, in order to come to such conclusion, you're taking in cosideration that:
- All visitors have plain control of all their doings.
- All visitors are mentally sound.
- The visitors are aware of the fact that fiction should not be always brought into reality.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work in such idealistic way. There are several studies on this field, both being for and against this sort of censorship but unless there is enough material to come to a conclusion, a more cautious policy would be better than a "not guilty until proven" policy. If the person needs those violent sexual stimuli that bad, they could look for other people with the same need and engage on these acts among themselves and keeping it from the public.
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Besides they are not going to succeed they said it that most of the porn was coming from the USA and they can't regulate what is being done in the US. |
The US, often being a puritan country, would likely follow the steps of United Kingdom but, even if it didn't it doesn't contradict with the arguments.
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
|
|
Aug-30-2005 16:19
|
|
|
 |
 |
metalgearsolid
I am a sexist

Registered: Apr 2005
Location: For you neo/
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Pariah Cleric
It's the violent pornography, choking chicks and sodomyyyy... the kind of shit you get on your TV. |
please no system of a down lyrics. But I do see the point.
| quote: | You're actually right. It's incredible that once you have a rule set, some people will blindly disobey, often just for the sake of it. I'm for it because it could lead to two main scenarios:
It could succeed. Given the nature of internet and how it works, simply banning the sites in the United Kingdom would be no use. If anything, users seeing some "rape porn" could be sued, for example.
It could fail, and the ban would end up becoming as pathetic as censorship on computer games and whatnot.
These being two ideal consequences, the result would eventually be in-between. Most likely, there would be some success (if any) and some failure. Some would defend either the status quo or the ban, acting mainly on emotion, but there would be discussion, which matters more than just leaving it untouched. |
You see some of that "rape porn" is not real so it can't bother you that two individuals agreed to do this. There might be some out there that is real and that as it is; is illegal and must be dealt with. Like this one time I dl a video on Emule and it was of this girl who looked to have been drugged and she was having intercourse with this guy and his wife. You could tell she was drugged due to the fact that the wife was moving the girl around so that her husband could stick his pennis in her mouth etc.
| quote: | | Now that's a utopian vision. Being a social being, it's absurd to believe that any individual would have the plain right to do (and show) whatever they want. There are limits to this liberty, such as a common well-being. That's why crimes exist, for example. Once a person engages on an act that might harm another individual, the right of doing such thing is open to dispute. |
Yes you are correct there are limits. Obviously you wouldn't want to be raped or murdered so stop that if that is what you are doing. Now if you really want to go far out you should ban making fun of people. It offends the person being made fun of and it might have dire consequences when the childl is older. Such as he might become a drug addict because all his life people made fun of him and he didn't have any friends so he had no one he could rely on. You see about this ban is that most of it is being done by willing participants, kinda like prositution where is the harm in that.
| quote: | However, in order to come to such conclusion, you're taking in cosideration that: All visitors have plain control of all their doings. All visitors are mentally sound. The visitors are aware of the fact that fiction should not be always brought into reality.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work in such idealistic way. There are several studies on this field, both being for and against this sort of censorship but unless there is enough material to come to a conclusion, a more cautious policy would be better than a "not guilty until proven" policy. If the person needs those violent sexual stimuli that bad, they could look for other people with the same need and engage on these acts among themselves and keeping it from the public. |
I will give you a conclusion: Better parenting equals less abuse of drugs, less abuse of alcohol, less unwanted pregnancies. Fuck if there weren't so many shitty parents than there wouldn't be as many problems. Some people might not be mentally sane but that does not always mean they will go out and commit a violent crime. I have a tenant who owns over twenty handguns and he is legally crazy. He has never commited a crime with the guns other than purchasing them. What causes crimes is authorotarian parents who abuse thier children while young and during the whole time they live with them. Most of those people will go out and rebel against authority. In short better parents are needed to prevent such crimes.
| quote: | | The US, often being a puritan country, would likely follow the steps of United Kingdom but, even if it didn't it doesn't contradict with the arguments. |
My brain seems dead by now must be due to the fact I have a hangover. Oh, ok the US of A is a puritan country. That is why we have the highest rate of divorces and cheating on spouses. It would also be as to why the porn industry in the US alone is a twenty billion dollar industry, and as to why the gambling industry here is 900 billion dollars worth. It could also explain why we have the most rapes in the world because of our purity. That to me really sounds puritan . This ban would be just as successful as the drug war. In fact the banned would make it just "cool" to rebel against. By banning anything that would have been done by a few before you just make it comman practice for the rest once the ban is there.
|
|
Aug-30-2005 21:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:18.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|