 |
|
|
|
 |
Renegade
____________/

Registered: May 2001
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
|
|
|
I heard about this on the radio tonight. They interviewed a guy from the Australian nuclear body (I forget the acronym, sorry) and he said that the speech was more politics than an accurate reflection of where Iran is at with regards to producing a nuclear weapon at the moment. In order to produce a nuclear bomb you need thousands of centrifuges (I believe he said up to 50,000) and Iran is only known to have 164. The plutonium has to be of a certain "grade" (I believe he said 90% refined) and Iran is still a long way from acquiring this (3.5% refined from memory?).
I'll see if I can find some links that back up what I'm saying, but I don't think this is anything to get too worried about just yet...
EDIT: Close enough.
| quote: | "Iran said it had become a nuclear power like other countries pursuing peaceful nuclear programs," said Mikhailov, who heads the Strategic Stability Institute think tank. "Indeed, uranium enrichment at 3.5% is a medium used in fuel rods at nuclear power plants."
The enrichment level announced by Ahmadinejad falls far short of weapons-grade material, which needs at least 80% enrichment, Mikhailov said, adding that Iran should take a realistic view, given its current enrichment capacities. |
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20060412/45719776.html
| quote: | The IAEA found Iran had probably carried out test enrichments of uranium with its centrifuges long before this.
• A claim of 3.5% enrichment is not much of an achievement if true.
• There is no clear evidence that Iran has brought the limited 164 centrifuge chain at Natanz on-line in any kind of sustained operation. A one shot, limited output test has little meaning.
• These are old P-1 centrifuges. It takes thousands operating continuously for a year to have major output and 10,000s to get seriously into the weapons grade production. |
http://abcnews.go.com/International...=1833030&page=1
___________________
http://eschatonnow.blogspot.com/
Last edited by Renegade on Apr-12-2006 at 10:07
|
|
Apr-12-2006 09:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Renegade
and Iran is only known to have 164. The plutonium has to be of a certain "grade" (I believe he said 90% refined) and Iran is still a long way from acquiring this (3.5% refined from memory?). |
coulda swore i read somewhere they were in possesion of more centrifuges than that. i'll look.
a "long way" on the atomic scale is "relative"...get it? dumb. anyway this should shorten the timeline for everyone a bit.
| quote: | September, 1944 -
* At this point K-25 is half built, but no usable diffusion barriers have been produced. The Y-12 plant is operating at only 0.05% efficiency. The total production of highly enriched uranium to date is a few grams.
December, 1944 -
* Y-12 output climbs to 90 grams of highly enriched uranium a day.
August 6, 1945 -
* 0916:02 (8:16:02 Hiroshima time) - Little Boy explodes at an altitude of 1850 feet, 550 feet from the aim point, the Aioi Bridge, with a yield of 12.5-18 kt (best estimate is 15 kt).
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq10.html |
that was when the technology didn't even exist just shortly before the next crucial steps needed to be completed to the end we are all familiar with.
according to the archive, the first "racetrack", Y-12 consisted of "96 units" (centrifuges) when started in OCT '43 but had trouble with the magnets. however, a year later it's pumping out 90g a day. only 40kg is needed to yield a 15kt device.
Last edited by Q5echo on Apr-12-2006 at 10:56
|
|
Apr-12-2006 10:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
Renegade
____________/

Registered: May 2001
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Q5echo
coulda swore i read somewhere they were in possesion of more centrifuges than that. i'll look. |
According to this they only have 164 and it would take them two decades to produce a bomb with that many:
| quote: | | It would take Iran about two decades to yield enough highly enriched uranium for one bomb with its current cascade of 164 centrifuges. But Tehran says it wants to install 3,000 centrifuges, enough to produce material for a warhead in a year. |
http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/intern...y=1144805877000
More technically:
| quote: | | An implosion weapon using U235 would require about 20 kg of 90% U235. Roughly 176 kg of natural uranium would be required per kg of HEU product, and about 230 SWU per kg of HEU, thus requiring a total of about 4,600 SWU per weapon. To enrich natural uranium for one gun-type uranium bomb would requires roughly 14,000 SWUs. Thus, producing one HEU weapon in a year would require between 1,100 to perhaps 3,500 centrifuges. |
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/i...-centrifuge.htm
| quote: | | a "long way" on the atomic scale is "relative"...get it? |
I'm struggling to find information about how accessible these additional centrifuges that Iran wants to build would be in terms of cost or technological know-how (Iran may not be able to afford to, or know how to, build these additional centrifuges) but until they are built, or it seems that they are close to being built, the issue isn't urgent in the sense that Iran is currently on the brink of "getting the bomb". By any definition, Iran is still a fair way from producing even a single nuclear bomb, let alone an entire nuclear arsenal.
___________________
http://eschatonnow.blogspot.com/
|
|
Apr-12-2006 11:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
tranceNlife
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: REQUIRED
|
|
|
Apr-12-2006 17:06
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:44.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|