|
Not really... the Denon's are very nice decks (I used to own a pair)...
The Pioneers have the following over the Denons:
1. The CDJ-200's have .02% pitch resolution at +/- 6%. That's as accurate as the CDJ-1000's (and better than the CDJ-800). The Denon DN-S1000 has .1% pitch accuracy. Now, you should be able to mix fine with either deck (there's a lot of people obsessed with pitch resolution for some reason, even though up until a few years ago all CD decks were .1% and nobody minded much).
2. The CDJ-200's use the "Pioneer" style of cueing and looping. This is nice if you play out, as Pioneers are more common for standalone (not-dual) decks than are Denons. Once again, not a big deal.
The Denons have the following over the Pio's:
1. Scratch disc. Now it's not really good for "scratching" like a mad man, it's more of a scratch "effect". If you like that sort of thing it's an advantage.
2. Pitch bend buttons. Some people love these, some people hate them. I wouldn't mind having them on my CDJ-1000's, but alas Pioneer decks don't have them (except for their dual unit).
So they are both really solid little units (and the Denon's are really nice and little!). But for pure mixing, the pitch accuracy of the Pioneer's give them the edge.
Oh, and to the poster above: The DN-S1000 platter does not spin. Unless you spin it yourself, of course 
And the Denon cueing system isn't that bad... hit play/pause instead of cue.
| quote: | Originally posted by BobTheSlob
200's it is I guess. Any reasons why Denons are not getting picked? Is it just a "duh..because" kind of thing? |
|