 |
|
|
|
 |
Audigy7
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Eugene, Oregon
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by star-traveller
Don't you think that as long as this problem existed everybody was trying do something everyday single day with it?
Maybe its worth just leave it as it is and do nothing ? at least for a while ?
I mean to stop all these flacky threats from the US or Japan and just live.
Do they (NK) harm anybody right now ? |
Did Hitler HARM anyone when he remilatarized the Rhineland in 1935? No, but if he'd been stopped then, he sure wouldn't have hurt anyone later on.
But as for what I think we should, I haven't yet decided. But, I think that sanctions aren't going to be effective. The only thing that sanctions will accomplish is to further hurt the North Korean people because the government will then have less resources to spare outside of their military program, which is really all they care about.
I'm also beginning to think that diplomacy isn't going to be effective in North Korea's case. Of all the summits and meetings so far, there really hasn't been much if any progress. Perhaps diplomacy would be effective if it was handled differently than the way the current administration is handling it? I can't quite say.
It's going to be interesting to see how this all pans out, regardless of the response.
___________________

"I think i'll name my testicles Mysaq. So then I can be like, "wooah woowwho whwowooaaa there Mysaq, it's not a good idea to teabag a tarantula."" - Glade776
|
|
Oct-10-2006 16:38
|
|
|
 |
 |
Magnetonium
Dubstep = Douchestep

Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Port Burwell, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
Chinese are fed up with this regime already - NK has increased the tension and instability in the region that threatens Chinese interests. China must now pressure NK with sanctions and political pressure, I know its extreme, but - thats the only way.
And also the regime has to go. But then ask yourself this question - would a pro-American leader of NK make the region more stable? Certainly debatable, but China will as a result build up on arms and/or interfere, which can create another Korean war.
Basically North Korea needs a new leader.
___________________
Whenever you go and buy something, you are affecting someone somewhere, be it environment, a person, or a community - you're making a statement with what you buy. So make it a smart choice ... Its a big picture
|
|
Oct-10-2006 18:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
ShadoWolf
ISOS

Registered: Apr 2002
Location: State of Trance
|
|
|
| quote: | Kim Jong-Il's explosive mistake
National Post
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
There are two kinds of rogue dictators: the successful kind, who stay in office by playing major powers off against each other; and the failures, who overreach, unite the world against them and thereby summon the forces of regime change.
Until Monday, Kim Jong-Il seemed to fit into the first category. But things have now changed. As Con Coughlin of the Daily Telegraph notes, thanks to Pyongyang's underground nuclear test, "The world's leaders have finally found something on which they can all agree."
For the first time since North Korea's uranium enrichment program was discovered in 2002, we may now see a complete and crippling set of sanctions imposed on North Korea, and an end to the coddling provided by Russia, China and South Korea. In the best case scenario, the reaction to North Korea's belligerent provocation would be so strong that it would discourage North Korea's Middle Eastern counterpart, Iran, from going down the same route.
The civilized world now faces three choices in regard to North Korea -- none of them good, but one of them better than the rest.
The first option is a U.S.-led military strike against North Korean nuclear sites. Such an action would almost certainly unleash a catastrophic North Korean rocket and artillery attack against South Korea, incinerating whole neighbourhoods and plunging one of the world's largest economies into total chaos. Absent a direct North Korean attack on South Korea or one of its allies, this is not in the cards.
The second option is to appease North Korea by fulfilling the long shopping list it has provided the West in recent years -- including food, oil, uranium and security guarantees. Such an option would produce peace in the short-term but, like all other efforts at appeasement, would simply generate more extensive demands in the future. (Recall that Bill Clinton sought to buy off North Korea with the 1994 "Agreed Framework." But all that did was delay the inevitable for eight years.)
The final and best option is for the major powers with a stake in North Korea -- Russia, China, the United States, South Korea and Japan -- to jointly create a strategy for regime change in North Korea, including a plan for managing the massive humanitarian fallout that such regime change would bring.
Prior to Sunday's nuclear test, such co-operation would have been unthinkable: Russia, China and South Korea were all paralyzed by their fears about what a North Korean meltdown would bring. But things changed drastically this week, and a consensus may be possible.
Kim Jong-Il would have been wise to avoid taking this step: There's nothing like a nuclear explosion to focus the mind.
© National Post 2006 |
___________________
Nathan Fake - Outhouse (Valentino Kanzyani Remix) || ID PLZ! PVD ID!!!
Disco and classical had sex while watching a sci-fi movie. Their child: trance.
|
|
Oct-10-2006 19:04
|
|
|
 |
 |
Magnetonium
Dubstep = Douchestep

Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Port Burwell, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
We should assasinate Kim Jong, no need to invade whole country and stuff.. just get him killed with one bullet from a North Korean itself (preferably a farmer from rural north korea, who is the victim of his rule and poverty) .. regime change will happen on its own ... |
I am leaning towards that too. A different leader will definitely change the retoric. Kim is an idiot, he wants to be strong and influential in the region (LOL!), and have massive military to protect against a possible South Korean / American invasion.
He is deeply mistaken in pursuing nuclear weapons. Why? Now the West will pursue him more, and China, Russia, Japan, and others will be forced to play a tougher game, because noone's happy with NK's selfish and self-defeating ambitions.
What North Korea should have done is instead ally itself more with China or Russia (like Russia/Venezuela relationship, or Russia/China), and these countries will help and support NK. Now, noone will support NK. Kim is fucked. What's worse, is that his people are now going to suffer even more ...
___________________
Whenever you go and buy something, you are affecting someone somewhere, be it environment, a person, or a community - you're making a statement with what you buy. So make it a smart choice ... Its a big picture
|
|
Oct-10-2006 22:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ Shibby
Amphoteric Superbase

Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Of Earthzen and the Therethen
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Purple
We should assasinate Kim Jong, no need to invade whole country and stuff.. just get him killed with one bullet from a North Korean itself (preferably a farmer from rural north korea, who is the victim of his rule and poverty) .. regime change will happen on its own ... |
North Koreans are fiercely nationalistic, just like any other human in any other country.
The United States has millions upon millions of people living in third world conditions and in trailer parks, but they're still nationalistic. Same deal with North Korea: they believe the bullshit they're fed by their leaders (whether it be because they're forced to, or a situation like in America where many people are jaded, apathetic, and ignorant).
China won't do anything about NK, because NK isn't going to be threatening China *yet*. NK is saying that they're building nukes solely because of the United States. This may be true, and I can understand why a country would be intimidated into doing so by the United States, or it may be a scapegoat, since no one likes the United States right now and it will give them a reason to build their nuclear arsenal with less worry than if their enemy had been a less common enemy and a more regional one.
Assassination is not an option; their country is CLOSED. Even if it was an option, you would only be replacing him with another just like him.
This is IF NK even detonated a nuke.
As of right now, I'm guessing that they are doing what they do best: bluffing.
If they're not bluffing, and they actually detonated a nuke, then the test must have failed. Even the cheapest uranium core would have caused a much greater magnitude of force and we would be able to roughly calculate its deterioration over distance to determine the power (in TNT/ton) of the weapon.
As of right now, all the data is saying that its no stronger than a stockpile of conventional weapons, and we'll have to wait and see if any gamma radiation is detected (not that we have good enough tools to do this from a distance and in secret...)
UPDATE:
"The U.S. believes North Korea tried to detonate a nuclear device and "something went wrong," a government official told CNN Tuesday."
There we go then. =)
Last edited by DJ Shibby on Oct-11-2006 at 01:19
|
|
Oct-11-2006 00:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|