Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > Cdj 1000 mk3 or Cdj 800 mk2 Whats The Difference?
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
jey
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2004
Location: N.Ireland
Cdj 1000 mk3 or Cdj 800 mk2 Whats The Difference?

apart from the jog wheel bein better on the 1000 what the main difference between the two???

is the 1000 way better to mix with???

Old Post Feb-12-2007 18:29  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for jey Click here to Send jey a Private Message Visit jey's homepage! Add jey to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
skip
a.k.a. skip2



Registered: Sep 2002
Location: home or somewhere else

1000 has 0,02% pitch resolution
800 has 0,05% pitch resolution
1000 is a lot sexier
1000 has a waveform display
1000 has a slot for an sd card so you can store as many cue points as you wish, 800 only has limited internal memory

can't think of anything else atm as i haven't played with either one.


___________________

Get Dropbox, with 250 MB extra space!

Old Post Feb-12-2007 18:37  Finland
Click Here to See the Profile for skip Click here to Send skip a Private Message Add skip to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Jarvmeister
Building a fire......



Registered: May 2001
Location: Trancentral

1000 has (that the 800 doesn't) in additions to what he said ^^^^

Hot Cues/Loops
Adjustable Platter resistance
Separate Brake and Startup adjustment (800 has one setting that controls both)
Higher Resolution Display

The main one is the pitch resolution for me though - .05 is less than half as acurrate as .02 - Some people don't think it's worth worrying about, however thousands of professional DJs will argue otherwise.

Jarv

PS I'm no pro.

Old Post Feb-12-2007 18:46 
Click Here to See the Profile for Jarvmeister Click here to Send Jarvmeister a Private Message Add Jarvmeister to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DjWoody
Chingon



Registered: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles (OC) / Mexicali

The 800 has hot loops that the 1000 doesn't have.

Another big difference was the platter. The 800Mk1 has a very loose platter, but they fixed it on the MK2 to match that of the DVJ-X1.

The 1000 has 4 choices for tempo (+6, +10, +16, +100)
The 800 only has 2... (+10, +100)

800 has Quick Return, 1000 doesn't.

1000 has an eject lock.
1000 has cd text.

in other words, the 1000 is more customizable.

Old Post Feb-12-2007 19:41  Mexico
Click Here to See the Profile for DjWoody Click here to Send DjWoody a Private Message Visit DjWoody's homepage! Add DjWoody to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
david.michael
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Dayton, OH, USA

quote:
Cdj 1000 mk3 or Cdj 800 mk2 Whats The Difference?


About $650 bucks.

Old Post Feb-12-2007 19:57  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for david.michael Click here to Send david.michael a Private Message Visit david.michael's homepage! Add david.michael to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Jarvmeister
Building a fire......



Registered: May 2001
Location: Trancentral

quote:
Originally posted by DjWoody
The 800 has hot loops that the 1000 doesn't have.


It's a beat cutter, not a hot loop.

quote:
Originally posted by DjWoody
Another big difference was the platter. The 800Mk1 has a very loose platter, but they fixed it on the MK2 to match that of the DVJ-X1.


This is not a difference between the 800mk2 and the 1000mk3! Sorry to be picky!

Jarv

Old Post Feb-12-2007 19:58 
Click Here to See the Profile for Jarvmeister Click here to Send Jarvmeister a Private Message Add Jarvmeister to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Allayla
tech tribal sound



Registered: Mar 2005
Location: AZ

.02 always wins, i would much rather have a clean used pair of cdj 1000 mkI's than brand new 800 mkII's.. were talking the same price here.

Old Post Feb-12-2007 20:23 
Click Here to See the Profile for Allayla Click here to Send Allayla a Private Message Add Allayla to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
miamitranceman
Extreme tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Miami

I am quite happy with my 800 mk2s. Wasn't willing to shell out another 5-600 each for what is in my opinion a minimal upgrade for bedroom djing.


___________________
Click the link below to stream all of my mixes past and present. New mixes go up about once a month. Enjoy!

www.mixcloud.com/jluger

Old Post Feb-12-2007 20:30  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for miamitranceman Click here to Send miamitranceman a Private Message Add miamitranceman to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
sterilis
Sunset Ibiza



Registered: May 2005
Location: Belfast/Ibiza/Manchester

quote:
Originally posted by starboy
.02 always wins, i would much rather have a clean used pair of cdj 1000 mkI's than brand new 800 mkII's.. were talking the same price here.


it doesnt affect your mixing whatsoever. anyone that thinks that the 0.03 is a difference is talking nonsense. ive used both and havent noticed any difference in terms in of cueing the beat and holding it.


___________________
Official Site - www.sterilis.co.uk

Old Post Feb-12-2007 21:00  Ireland
Click Here to See the Profile for sterilis Click here to Send sterilis a Private Message Add sterilis to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
jey
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jul 2004
Location: N.Ireland

wow!!

a hell of alot of good points there.....

the price difference between the two is crazy!!

ive used the 1000 an they are brill but never the 800 but am leaning towards them because of cost, like it was said earlier... they are only for bedroom mixing!!

i heard alot of mk1 1000's arnt even as good as a mk2 800 and that they are prone to freezing!

Old Post Feb-12-2007 21:30  United Kingdom
Click Here to See the Profile for jey Click here to Send jey a Private Message Visit jey's homepage! Add jey to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Jarvmeister
Building a fire......



Registered: May 2001
Location: Trancentral

quote:
Originally posted by sterilis
it doesnt affect your mixing whatsoever. anyone that thinks that the 0.03 is a difference is talking nonsense. ive used both and havent noticed any difference in terms in of cueing the beat and holding it.


If you have half a brain and can add at a very basic level you would retract your statememt.

Or maybe Pioneer got it wrong and put a feature on a top of the line deck that no one needed.

Statements like this really do my head in - I mean come on - it's one of the most sellable feature of the 1000.

Those that say they can hold a mix for just as long with an 800 as they can with a 1000 are talking bollocks. And thats a scientifically proveable mathmatical fact!

Jarv

Old Post Feb-12-2007 21:31 
Click Here to See the Profile for Jarvmeister Click here to Send Jarvmeister a Private Message Add Jarvmeister to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
sterilis
Sunset Ibiza



Registered: May 2005
Location: Belfast/Ibiza/Manchester

quote:
Originally posted by Jarvmeister
If you have half a brain and can add at a very basic level you would retract your statememt.

Or maybe Pioneer got it wrong and put a feature on a top of the line deck that no one needed.

Statements like this really do my head in - I mean come on - it's one of the most sellable feature of the 1000.

Those that say they can hold a mix for just as long with an 800 as they can with a 1000 are talking bollocks. And thats a scientifically proveable mathmatical fact!

Jarv


if it was such a great feature then why would they put in the 200 which is at the low end of the price scale

mathmatics doesnt come into i dont need to hold mixes for longer that a minute anything over that and im over mixing a track i tend to keep it at around 45 seconds which on the 800 holds perfectly fine.


___________________
Official Site - www.sterilis.co.uk

Old Post Feb-12-2007 21:59  Ireland
Click Here to See the Profile for sterilis Click here to Send sterilis a Private Message Add sterilis to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > DJ Booth > Cdj 1000 mk3 or Cdj 800 mk2 Whats The Difference?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackold hardtrance tune id....1 [2004] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackVincent De Moor - Arctic Duction [2009]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:54.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!