|
I've used both, and the 400's are really quite nice. The HUGE improvement over the 200's is the platter... the platter is great. I have 1000's, and would have no qualms about using the 400's.
The 200's on the other hand, have kind of a cheap feeling platter with no vinyl emulation. But they do work well...
Plus you gain:
1. USB playback
2. MIDI control
3. Native Serato support
4. Integrated sound cards
So they are really pretty flexible.
The DJM-400 I don't love. It's a nice layout, and the effects seem nice at first, but I'm sure those will wear thing. The real problem with the DJM-400 is:
1. No separate booth output. This is a pain if you ever want to use the mixer anywhere other than your bedroom.
2. No balanced outputs.
3. No record output, makes it a pain to record your sets. You can split the master out, but then you can't use the volume control on the mixer or the recording will be messed up.
4. No extern effects send/return.
5. It's overpriced.
In that same class (and actually it's quite a bit cheaper), I'm a big fan of the new Ecler 2.0. It doesn't have effects... but it's an Ecler (great build and sound), and it has all of the above plus a third input for whatever you like. Check it out:
http://www.eclerdjdivision.com/prod...p=2&sub=1&id=34
Last edited by Ryan0751 on Aug-14-2008 at 13:28
|