 |
|
|
|
 |
spike_boy69
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location: Leeds
|
|
|
wots CDRWIN? and how can i get it, some one mentioned it once and said that it was good for puting sets on CD's so i tryed to find it but couldnt, cheers
chris
|
|
May-28-2002 15:10
|
|
|
 |
 |
Dj Flesch
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Indianapolis, USA
|
|
|
I'm guessing that at 163MB, it's an mp3. Why don't you convert it to a wave file and try buring that. This way you can also cut it up into two disks (which you will HAVE to do). Even with overburn you can only get a max of 80-85 minutes per cd
|
|
May-29-2002 17:14
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJ-Kuza
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
|
|
|
170mb and only 117 minutes???? That doesn't sound right.
|
|
May-29-2002 17:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Dj Flesch
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Indianapolis, USA
|
|
|
It depends on the bitrate it was encoded at. I've encoded my sets at 256kbps and a 121min set is 222MB!
|
|
Jun-02-2002 15:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJTJ
linuXaddict

Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Bournemouth, UK when I'm at home, Cardiff, UK when I'm at uni
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by P`zazz
Why 222, Isn't 192 good? |
Well, yes, 192 is OK but 256 is better. The higher the bitrate, the better the sound quality.
If you are recording your own set, and you want to put it onto a CD, there's no reason to actually encode it as an mp3, you'll only lose sound quality. The only reason you would want to encode it as an mp3 is to save space.
|
|
Jun-02-2002 16:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
Jah
i just want to wear a hat

Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Australia, Perth
|
|
|
Jun-04-2002 07:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJTJ
linuXaddict

Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Bournemouth, UK when I'm at home, Cardiff, UK when I'm at uni
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Trypsin
The thing to remember with live sets is that it doesn't matter what bitrate the mp3 is incoded with as much as what the source was. Many livesets are from the radio, which equates to about 112kbit quality. It's like polishing a turd - no matter how good you encode it, it's still going to sound just as crappy as the input. |
Not really...
It's been said before, but mp3 is a lossy format. As soon as you start encoding anything as an mp3 you immediately lose sound quality, no matter what the original was like, making it even worse than the original.
It's like getting a turd, and forming it into new and disturbing shapes. The lower the bitrate you encode it in, the more horrifying the turd becomes. If you encode it with a high bitrate, OK it's still a turd, but it doesn't smell quite as bad as it could have done.
|
|
Jun-04-2002 19:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:34.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|