|
| quote: | Originally posted by Jarvmeister
My verdict so far: the 92 is more of a purist's mixer, but I don't accept that the 92 is head and shoulders above the 800 - they are both great pieces of kit, and they both have flaws. |
I would say that this is a pretty fair assesment of the situation.
With regards to the pop, engage the filter with the resonance on mild is it sounds like you are getting a rez pop.
With regards to what you can do with the filters, kind of depends on what you use, but if you have loopability i.e. either through CDJs or virtual DJing tools etc.
I will sometimes loop a section in a track and than filter out all the high frequencies to give the impression of it being a break down of sorts and then mix in a vocal over the top (In key) or even sometimes a looped melody from another track where I have filtered out the bottom end, then start to work on building tension, perhaps finsih the segment with a loop rinse and then pump back into the previous track or a new one depending on what I feel fits.
When I work in clubs I come across the 600 or 800 8 times out of 10 and an A&H mixer is a bit of a rariety.
I still use a Xone 464 at home. It's huge but I love it to bits.
Cheers
Nem
___________________
https://www.mixcloud.com/Calvin_Karass/
|