 |
|
|
|
 |
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2006
Location:
|
|
|
I'm not a big fan of "combo" units at all. I really like to keep things separate so that each unit can do what it does best, rather than having a unit that's just "OK" for each specific duty. Every time I have used one of these combo units, it just sounds dull next to the dedicated alternatives.
If you like the Focusrite stuff in the ISA range, look for the 110's. They are discontinued, but they sound great and aren't terribly expensive secondhand.
Ideally, a second hand Vintech 473 (4-ch) or X73 (1-ch) would sound great combined with a UA 1176 unit. That'll cover your EQ, preamp and compression needs. The Vintech EQ's are really good, especially on vocals. That may be a bit outside your budget new, but I think it would definitely make a much bigger impact on your current setup than any "combo" unit. They are reasonably priced second hand, especially for the X-series.
I wasn't too impressed with the Liquid Channel at all, especially being a big time UAD user. I think the UAD stuff is way better and more musical.
The other thing about this is that if you are going to upgrade your signal path from the JoeMeek stuff, you may want to consider if your A/D is up to snuff or you won't be realizing the full benefits of getting upgraded units, "combo" or not.
|
|
Jul-14-2010 20:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
cryophonik
Boom shanka

Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Elk Grove, CA USA
|
|
|
@Eric - yeah, I see your point re: dedicated units and I used to feel the same way (particularly coming from a live sound background), but I've become a huge fan of the channel strip concept over dedicated units for home studio use for several reasons, including reduced self-noise levels, lower power consumption, less heat generation, and space savings. Even with the AC cranked, my studio can get pretty warm/uncomfortable during a recording session, so I've been on a mission to downsize the number of units.
Also, I really want an expander/gate, which is the one feature that my OneQ lacks. I don't have a vocal booth (and am not about to build one in our nice office/studio), so we record the vox right there in my studio, and a lot of noise gets picked up by the mic, which requires more processing time. I'm pretty obsessive when it comes to cleaning up my vocal tracks and can spend hours on them, so I'm looking to minimize some of that on the front end to give me more time to focus on more important tasks (i.e., composing).
Thanks for the input on the Liquid Channel - it seems to be one of those units that people either love or hate. I don't think it's really in the running for me at this point anyway, but I'd still like to know if you can use the convolution models to get de-essing, expansion, gating, etc. or if it's possible to sidechain the various modeled EQs/compressors.
| quote: | Originally posted by Zombie0729
maybe it's just me but i barely use the eq's on mic pre's... i tend to do that stuff post, i will boost at the recording stage but with caution. |
Same here for the most part. But I'll usually roll the low end off with the EQ when tracking (particularly with females) because it gives me more headroom in the compression stage if I'm running my compressor post-EQ. But, the EQ is also very handy to rough in a decent tone for guitar/bass. With certain EQ settings, my JoeMeek OneQ actually sounds great with my basses and acoustic guitar, so there's a good chance that I'll keep it (for a while at least) even if I do buy a new channel strip.
| quote: | Originally posted by Zombie0729
i am by no means an expert in this area so take what i say w/ a "what does this skinny kid really know?" attitude. the last 6 mos w/ about 12 vocal recordings, for the results i'm after the above has worked well. |
Hey, it's all good info if it's based on personal experience! 
___________________
cryophonik.com | facebook | soundcloud
Sonar Platinum | Ableton Live 9 | Logic Pro X | Access Virus TI2 Keyboard | Kurzweil PC3X | Nord Lead 4R | NI Maschine
|
|
Jul-14-2010 21:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
studiobob
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: May 2009
Location:
|
|
|
I prefer to do the more technical stuff ITB ie gating/ de-essing etc. never liked the idea of the boxes that come with everything...prefer to get the loudest clearest best sounding recording then play about with that ITB. Just recently upgraded our studio kit list so vox chain goes...
chandler germainium (for tone)!
focusrite 428 (to split the signal) ie route a dry ish copy into the computer on a seperate channel and send the other version to Langevin Pultec EQ and then Universal Audio 1176. recording in via apogee AD. Does sound massive! the empirical labs distressor is also great on shouty rock/metal vocals... definitly recommended! and yes the 1176 box sounds better than the UAD plugin by some way!
___________________
www.soundcloud.com/iainsanderson
|
|
Jul-14-2010 21:59
|
|
|
 |
 |
Eric J
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2006
Location:
|
|
|
Jul-28-2010 17:51
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:53.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|