My new setup will be based around 2 machines, PC for the main/software DAW and the Macbook will take care of the hardware setup.
I want to be able to use the Fireface 400 for midi (as it's the tightest midi I've ever used outside a hardware sequencer) but also fancy the idea of using a ZEDR16 or Midas F16-32 for all the hardware as well.
Do any of you guys use aggregate devices on your Mac setups, and does it work successfully? I'd love to be able to use a multi channel desk and the Fireface at the same time.
No I just want to use more than one audio interface on the Mac.
You can't do it on PC but you can with iOS
So for example I use the Fireface 400 as an interface, I use a FW capable mixing desk as another interface and I use the TR8 (which also has to be used as an interface to get multi channel audio over USB) at the same time.
pretty sure it has been more buggy since leapard. You could use the Fireface in standalone mode and just route the audio to the mixer using the adat out. in fact you can still run totalmix from mac so scrap the standalone mod.
I use an apogee symphony for my 2 mac towers, 2 UCX which are hooked up to a pc and an imac, and then the pc has an pciex lightpipe with 32+ stereo in out.
Aggregating devices works, but it comes at a small performance cost to create a virtual sync.
___________________
-~-
Mar-17-2015 22:43
DJ RANN
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2001
Location: Hollywood....
Aggregate devices work fine in OSX. Not sure what the issue is. I needed a couple more outputs on one project (just for reference, not audio crucial) so I added the built in audio on my imac to Audfiofire. Took all of 10 seconds to create the aggregate audio device and all was well with the world.
The only thing where it gets fucking is when the devices have markedly different performance and you should really make sure the buffers are all the same.
Let me know if you need a step by step Geoff?
Mar-18-2015 02:15
Looney4Clooney
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2010
Location:
its buggy meaning it fucks up enough to make it just not worth the time. Try using 2 devices instead of the built in one. Things just don't work well enough for me to consider it an option.
So you could print tracks out on your daw that had been routed out a USB interface, and mixed with a desk interface? is that the goal like a proper hands on mixing solution? just trying to see why