being a white male between the age of 18-55 i'm very opposed to the idea of educational benefits to minorities simply because of race...i know the arguments for and against and i know i'm biased, but i still think it should be given to the best student, which in most cases would be someone like me...i've always been at the top and although i've recieved scholarships for school, i've seen a lot of people not as qualified as me recieving similar compensation.


i'll also just add something about affirmative action in general...i remember last year, bush (florida bush) tried to pass some kind of end of affirmative action policy in florida and there was a huge outrage and protests etc saying that its not fair to take it away. i've always viewed minorities as wanting to be equal so how would you guys respond to that as they so clearly desire an advantage?

I'm opposed to anything in general that categorizes human beings into different groups and proceeds to give benefits or detriments to members of those groups based on generalizations about them. Therefore, I can support neither profiling of any kind nor affirmative action.

I could have legally applied to college as a minority, and probably would have received a lot more financial aid if I had chosen to. But in my opinion it would have been dishonorable for me to do so, as I do not believe I deserve an advantage over other candidates merely because of my ethnic background.

But I think the area in which this problem is most severe is not race, but age. There are thousands of human beings under the age of 18 who are more intellectually qualified to vote than 99% of the public, yet they are denied this right because they are categorized as "minors". We tell people they can't drink until they're 21, but who knows how many people younger than that are responsible enough to handle it, or at least comparatively more responsible than the average person older than that.

I am firmly against both affirmative action, and racial profiling.
It is wrong to discriminate based on race, sex, religion etc.

arbiter sates my opinion in regards to this perfectly in the first half of his post.

however, in regards to age, it's a little tougher to discern. i think we have to put some limits on things, we can't go letting four year olds drive now can we?

or, in regards to voting, I'd agree that some 15 year olds are more competent to vote than some 75 year old florida residents. BUT, how do you determine this?

i suppose in an ideal world, you'd have some sort of IQ test, but... this is impractical, the age limit is the best way to do it, and this applies to voting, drinking, driving, "adult" material etc.

___________________

Visit my site Antiwar Homepage

I'm against affirmitave actions for a couple reasons. The first reason is that in much of todays society a large percentage no longer has any basis for or against any group of people(at least not on a concious level), and many people who do have something against them, are the ones who lose there jobs to meet quotas. Secondly if any group wants to be equal to another group, they can not recieve any of these huge bennifits based on there skin color.

1950: racial segregation
2000: racial profiling

differnt terms for the same thing.

should I go on?

___________________
[/IMG]http://i54.tinypic.com/ngycqo.png[/IMG]

quote:

Originally posted by JohnSmith however, in regards to age, it's a little tougher to discern. i think we have to put some limits on things, we can't go letting four year olds drive now can we? or, in regards to voting, I'd agree that some 15 year olds are more competent to vote than some 75 year old florida residents. BUT, how do you determine this? i suppose in an ideal world, you'd have some sort of IQ test, but... this is impractical, the age limit is the best way to do it, and this applies to voting, drinking, driving, "adult" material etc.

Well it's obvious that four year olds ought not to be allowed to drive, but we can disqualify them on criteria other than age (i.e. the physical ability to operate a motor vehicle), so an age restriction is an unnecessary evil.

As far as voting - I don't think some form of testing is that impractical at all. If only we had a decent system of education (especially one in which students are able to progress through levels of subject material at whatever pace they are capable of), we could analyze childrens' competency with relative ease. It certainly wouldn't be as convenient as an age limit, but I think it's wrong to sacrifice our principles merely for the sake of convenience. An added benefit would be that many children might be more motivated to perform academically, if they knew they could be awarded additional rights as a citizen.

okay americansy, digame:
what exactely is racial profiling?

(i know what affirmative action is)

___________________
"Those are my principles, if you don't like them... well, I have others.”

quote:

Originally posted by TranceGiant okay americansy, digame: what exactely is racial profiling? (i know what affirmative action is)

It's essentially the same thing, only backwards. Racial profiling is basically when minority groups are stereotyped and treated worse than the majority in certain area's relating to whatever stereotype follows them around.

quote:

Originally posted by TranceGiant okay americansy, digame: what exactely is racial profiling? (i know what affirmative action is)

im completely agianst affirmative action, however i am FOR racial profiling

i will disagree with Nadi's definition of racial profiling completely. it does not have to nessaciraly deal with minorities, nor is it the cause of worse treatment. also true correct racial profiling is based not on stereotypes but rather on facts.

racial profiling is looking at statistics (of a certain race in this case) and then using that information as a guide to helping access a solution to a certain problem.

i can say that in general more jews eat matzot then non jews, and so when creating a grocery store would market a certain advertisment to a certian race of people. i have just racially profiled based on race and have reeked benifits ($).

lets look at airport security, you will see a patern that the majority of terroist acts on planes have been committed by muslims from the mid-eastern part of this earth. racial profiling says that it doesnt mean all the other groups arent likely to commit the same acts it just says that tendency shows one specific group is more prone to it. any smart man would use this information to his advantage. you can then compare this to gambling, a smart man ratehr would waste his time playing blackjack over bakara because his odds are greater at winning in blackjack, that isnt to say he couldnt win more in bakara or that bakara is actually funner to play.

we know everyone isnt equal in the way they act, we know races have diffences in the way they act. by not using profiling on any case be it religion, ethnicity, race or even age, is like deciding not to use a whole set of information, and by doing so one could possible be ignoring the most effecient solution to a problem.

___________________
If God is the answer, it must have been a very stupid question.

quote:

Originally posted by Floorfiller i know i'm biased, but i still think it should be given to the best student, which in most cases would be someone like me

modesty my friend , modesty

___________________
"A style that's impossible to define. Prog? Hardly. Tech house? Not boring enough. It's like trippy twisted acid house but deep and funky. See, I told you - impossible."

quote:

Originally posted by JohnSmith however, in regards to age, it's a little tougher to discern. i think we have to put some limits on things, we can't go letting four year olds drive now can we?

Hey, if the kid can pass the written and road test fair and square, why not? :P

There was a big fuss here when the toronto star released a report showing racial profiling by the police department. Statistics show that blacks had a disporportionate number of arrests, and they are more likely to get pulled over.

Does it mean black people commit more crime? Does the police force use this information, and pull and search black people more often? Or is it racial stereotyping that caused these statistics in the first place?

___________________
jimtran.net