|
Does anyone else think the scoring system is a tad bit unfair? 5th place recieves 20% of the points compared to first place. Atypically the difference between first and fifth on a leaderboard is far less than this (afterall your not picking "5 from your spectrum of producers from good to bad", your picking your *TOP 5*). Should it really take 5 "fifth" place votes to equal one first place vote? I think the scoring system needs to be weighted in such a way that 4th and 5th place votes actually count for something. Having first place count for 8 points instead of 5 and 5th place counting for 3 instead of one would work out a lot better as an "accurate" representation imho.. or better yet just having every vote count for "1 point" would be perfectly good and fair. I would hope that all 5 people on your top 5 list are so close to the same that switching them around wouldn't make much of a difference (in your mind) but the points they get would.
___________________
| quote: | Venus: And there are troops of savage giraffes whose necks are on fire, like
the starry ejaculations of fireworks in the very pale sky of childhood
...
Venus: Enter, enter here - men of all kinds and races, victims of reality!
You who have the thirst for dreams.
...
Venus: You, on life's bitter road, drenched in hard sunlight who have the
thirst that once more the dark marvel of dreams... |
|
