|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
Wow. I must say I am impressed. You gave me a link defining 'Jihad' from somebody who is criticising Islam. Wow.
....
YEARGHAA! |
Wow, Georgey has just pulled a Dean. 
Simmer down now there Georgey, get over your denial and let your anger out... 
To be constructive though, I won't get between your little love affair with NeoPhon, but let me add this point for either of your arguments.
Wheter the Islamo-facist have declared they want to spread Islam over the entire world, or just some of it, they are expanding beyond their traditional Basins.
Islamo-facisim has spread into Europe (Balkans, and a small but growing momvement in France), Checnya, Africa (think how radical Niger has become in the past 10 years), Indonesia, Malaysia... etc
So they are defintely not limiting themselves to the "traditional" middle eastern countries, and expand the world over. Whether this is their goal or not is another matter, but the facts are quiet nicely written on the wall for us if we want to look.
| quote: | Originally posted by Alccode
Interesting, Yoepus. Thanks for the input.
|
Glad at least some people can debate civilized here, even if they have diametrically opposed views 
| quote: | | Collectively, entire peoples have very short attention spans and memories, so you would have to "remind" them very often. |
Tell you true, if the USA invades one more country, even if done with pseudo-randomness (or they could just attack Korea), I believe the rest of the nations will play-dead or do whatever the USA asks them to for at least the next 15 years.
The downside of that is not necissairly violence begets violence, but violence begets military hardware. If they USA goes lose canon, many nations,especially those with friendlier relatiosn with the USA are going to balance out the USA with a force built up.
| quote: | | And this ties into the violence begets violence idea, of which I am positively sure. Are the 'hawks' on this board also convinced of this? Based on their policies and ideas (your ideas, I should say), I think not. |
Look, if we honeslty believed violence begets violence we wouldn't champion this way of thinking. Violence doesn't always begets violence, violence is a very good solution. If it wasn't proof enough for the past 6000+ years of human civilized history we have used war and violence to positively settle our disputes, than I don't know what is. If violence did not work, we wouldn't use it, its that simple.
Let me illustrate this with your example:
| quote: |
Think of it this way -- if someone slaps you, what are you going to do? Slap them back! And if not, if for some chance you are of a higher understanding and development as a person, you will not slap them back. But we know that mobs work on the lowest common denominator. You "slap" a mob (or people, or nation), and they will retaliate. |
What if the guy that slaps you has a gun?
You see my point now, would you slap back a guy with a gun?
Because the USA has a gun, and the "middle eastern mobs" don't, they have a peashoter.
And carrying your analogy further this is how I see it. The "middle eastern mob" has a pea shoter, and they slap the USA, the USA has a gun but doesn't show it to them.. it only slaps them back, they slap back. I say its about time the USA shows them its carrying a gun.
___________________
SAVE ZIONIST MUSTARD: BUY ZIONIST KETCHUP!
Click here to support the free mustard alliance.
Last edited by Yoepus on Mar-14-2004 at 02:33
|