Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > What would the consequences be if Christianity and Islam were merged?
Pages (11): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
ogvh5150
Formula 1 Addict



Registered: Aug 2003
Location: F1 2008 Red Bull Racing/BMW Sauber

quote:
Originally posted by .montecarlo.
I said use your own words. You did nothing of the sort....Does it bother you to compose your own thoughts?...


Why you can never believe the Bible as fact:
Isaiah 64:4 For since the beginning of the world [men] have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, beside thee, [what] he hath prepared for him that waiteth for him.

1 Corinthians 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.

Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

Why I just can't quote the Bible to an atheist:
Matthew 7:6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.

Old Post Dec-29-2004 19:36 
Click Here to See the Profile for ogvh5150 Click here to Send ogvh5150 a Private Message Add ogvh5150 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23



Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas

im going have this summerized. the firmament article is basically the basic case for creation. i havnt found anything u guys have put up to discredit anything in it, other than "its myth", "its not scientific", blah. so lets start with it. the scholar who wrote it has a lot more knowledge than me on the subject, and so this article can make my case better than i can in my own research and words. so, now, i ask that either of you show your case against the subjects talked about in this article. no personal opinions stating facts.

example: hydrogen doesnt glow pink, it glows orange. u may be right, but how can i find out for sure?? show me something i can see for myself if it's right.

and ill say, u two are very formiable debators.

Source

A Firmament = A Great World!
There is vast Biblical and scientific evidence showing a primordial paradise. Legends and traditions record that some people did not experience helpless old age. The Sumerians and Egyptians record that there was no sin on the earth, the crocodile did not seize prey and the serpent did not bite. From China as well we find records that tell animals and birds were led about without restraint. (ICR, Impact 192) Could this have really happened? The Bible clearly says it did and science now seems to suggest the possibility.

One of the major reasons this paradise was in place may be due to the firmament created in the sky by God on the second day. "And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so" (Genesis 1:6-7). During creation there was both a vertical and horizontal separation of water. The "horizontal" separated the dry land from the water and the "vertical" separated water from water thus creating the firmament. Therefore we have an indication that water was involved in this canopy. We do not know for sure what it was made of but other possible clues come from the Hebrew word for firmament, raqiya (raw-kee'-ah). Raqiya means to flatten out and extend a solid vault or canopy.

Another interesting thing about raqiya is that it also seems to refer to metal. For years Hebrew scholars have not known what to do with this definition of "firmament" so it has generally been accepted as just being a water vapor canopy. However, Josephus, a famous Jewish Historian records that the firmament was indeed crystalline (Josephus, Antiquities) as do other modern scholars. Now new scientific evidence also seems to support the idea of metal in the firmament as well.

An interesting characteristic of most metals is that they are clear in their pure form. In fact, when men went to the moon their visors on their helmets had a thin layer of pure, transparent, gold (National Geographic, Dec. 1969). Water is H2O, meaning two parts Hydrogen and one part Oxygen. When pure H2O is compressed in experiments done today, under extremely cold conditions the Oxygen appears bluish but the two parts of Hydrogen are crystallized. At first the crystals appear transparent (can see through) and later they become opaque (can't see through). Since raqiya means to flatten, or compress together and spread out, the water (H2O) may have reacted in a similar way as seen in the above experiment, creating a firmament with hydrogen crystals (Baugh, Symphony).

Taking this a step further, microscopic examination of this crystalline, metallic hydrogen shows that a vast majority is transparent, allowing light to shine through. However, also present in smaller amounts are areas of opaque metallic hydrogen that is super conductive (Popular Science, Oct. 1989, p 25). This is important for two reasons. First of all, light would shine through only those "veins" in the firmament which were transparent. But most importantly, the opaque, super conductive material would serve as a means to hold the firmament in place. Recent experiments of super conductive material resulted in mid air suspension of certain objects. Nasa showed a photograph of a man holding super conductive material between his fingers causing a magnet to be suspended above. This would work both upside down and right side up (NASA, 1988). Keeping in mind that the earth is like a great big magnet and the firmament perhaps having super conductive metallic hydrogen, the crystalline canopy would be held in place (Discover, March 1991).

Hydrogen when excited by energy glows pink. This could perhaps indicate why plants in the pre-Flood world grew much more abundantly than today (by hundreds of feet). This is not to say that the earth would appear pink but rather pink light would be given off. It would be similar to looking through a pair of pink sunglasses where the world does not appear pink but rather all colors appear more vividly. Research has shown that plants grow better in pink light which fits the firmament model exactly (Scientific American, April 1988, p.32).

Still, yet another fascinating result of such a firmament is that it solves much of our problem with C-14 dating. C-14 comes from N-14 being bombarded by cosmic radiation. The firmament would have filtered out the harmful, short wave, radiation received from the sun and therefore C-14 could not be produced (even if canopy was just water vapor). This means that living organisms before the flood would have little or no C-14 in their bodies and therefore would appear extremely old according to the C-14 dating method despite their being young in age.

The filtering of this radiation is one of the causes for longevity of life in the pre-Flood world as well. Studies done to show the average age of people on a geographical basis, shows that people today, live shorter life spans nearer the equator (Brown, Secret, p.92). Also, it is a well known fact that the sun causes us to age much faster than normal. Recently on the Ophrah Winfrey show someone asked if there was anything to stop the aging process. The answer was that the best thing you could do was to never (summer or winter) go outside without sun screen on. The deadly, short waves of the sun are known to cause over 60 diseases today, all of which would be prevented by the firmament filtering out these rays.

Another beneficial effect of the firmament would be greater air pressure with higher oxygen (Higher oxygen without the higher air pressure would be toxic). Secular evidence from trapped air bubbles in fossilized amber shows that before the Flood we had roughly twice the atmospheric pressure and 30-35% oxygen (compared to the current 21%) (Science, Vol. 239, p. 1406). However, new evidence has caused creationists to feel this is too high because oxygen poisoning would result and therefore a better estimate may be from 23 to 25%.

Higher air pressure is also what we would expect to see with the firmament because all atmospheric gases, which NASA shows have escaped nearly 200 miles into outer space (as far as gravitational pull would allow) would have been compressed underneath this canopy (Baugh, Battle). Today, greater air pressure with higher oxygen is of great benefit to our bodies as we see from replication of such an atmosphere in hyperbaric chambers. A hyperbaric chamber is something that allows us to control the oxygen and air pressure in a controlled environment. Amazing things happen with hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBO). Normally it takes from 7 to 21 days for an open wound to heal and 53 days to completely heal. However with HBO this healing time can on average be cut in half, depending on the severity and type of problem. (Fife, 1994). Dr. William Fife is head of the HBO lab at Texas A & M University where more research is done on this subject than any other non-government center. Some of the current research done at Texas A & M seems to suggest that HBO treatment may be able to cure Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Post Polio Syndrome and heal migraine headaches within 30 to 40 minutes. Other near miraculous healings of Gas Gangrene and ear drum problems, have been treated within one to two hours (Fife, 1995). In a few cases, people have showed near miraculous healing from arthritis and Carbon Monoxide Poisoning. It was reported that one man was brought into a hospital brain-dead as a direct result of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning. This man was an organ donor so doctors wanted to purify his organs. They wheeled him and his life support system into the chamber where three days later the organs were purified as the man walked out of the hospital completely recovered with complete memory (Baugh, Battle).

It has even been suggested that as a direct result of higher pressure and oxygen that mosquitoes would not even bite you before the Flood. Today, it is the female mosquito which bites in order to receive nutrients from the oxygen in your blood. However, in the pre-Flood atmosphere the higher oxygen content and air pressure would keep this annoying pest satisfied (Baugh, Symphony). Again this is something theorized about the unobserved past so we can not be sure but scientifically speaking, it would certainly be possible.

The amount of carbon dioxide in the air is much less today than during the pre-Flood era. It has been proposed that we had 8 times the amount we currently have today (from 0.026% to .25%) which again fits perfectly with the abundant vegetation of the Creation model (Discover, Dec. 1994, p.32).

The higher pressure and carbon dioxide content also explain why such lush, huge vegetation is seen in the fossil record. At K O University in Tokyo Japan, Dr. Kei Moris did some fascinating studies on a cherry tomato plant (The kind that get about 2-3 feet tall and live about 2-3 months with cherry size tomatoes). He wanted to maximize the potential of this tomato plants growth so he put it into a cylinder by which he could pump up the air pressure. Dr. Moris reasoned the plant would take in more carbon dioxide faster but inadvertently he was recreating a pre-flood atmosphere. Dr. Moris wanted to also rid the harmful rays of the sun so he brought sunlight to his basement through fiber optics, again inadvertently recreating the pre-Flood world. After two years had passed Kei Moris had a cherry tomato plant that stood over 14 feet tall, had 903 tomatoes that were baseball size (Brown, Secret,p 159). Today, this plant is still living after 14 years and is over 40 feet tall bearing 15,000 very large tomatoes (Baugh, Symphony). Being created as vegetarians (Genesis 1:29-30), this fits well into the "very good" world that God made.

Genesis 2:5 mentions that it did not rain until the time of the Flood and therefore natural streams watered the earth. With a firmament, a sub tropical climate would be expected all over the world because it would serve as a greenhouse, holding in the heat but not getting to hot. High and low air pressure systems would not form which would not allow clouds to form, which would not allow rain. This also explains why there was no rainbow before the Flood.

One final adjustment of our thinking about the pre-Flood world involves the electromagnetic field of the earth. Scientists have measured the electromagnetic field of the earths atmosphere for over a century and we now know that it has declined nearly 7% in only 130 years (McDonald). Not only does this present a healthier atmosphere in the past but a young one as well. According to this, if you would go back in time only 15 to 20,000 years ago, we would have the electromagnetic field of a neutron star and atoms could not hold together; the planet could not exist (Baugh, Symphony). Likewise, 2,000 years into the future, the field will cease and life will not be possible either (Nature, Vol. 278, 1987).

Further evidence shows that the electromagnetic field influences the body in incredible ways. In fact, it affects everything from molecules to man and without it, cells can not divide during the process of mitosis (Dubrov, p. 61). Evidence is also present showing that this much needed field was not only stronger in the past but may have even held steady before the Flood, thereby creating a better atmosphere. How and why could this be? Answer: the firmament held the energy in place (Baugh, Symphony).

My favorite example of the benefit of the higher electromagnet currents on our bodies has to deal with snakes. Today, if one is bit by a rattlesnake, a long process of treatment and pain is the outlook, unless you have a stun gun. Yes, a stun gun. I myself have one which delivers only 36,000 volts of D.C. current. If I was bit, I would take the stun gun and zap myself near the bite, again perpendicular to the first zap, and a third time just because it felt good. I probably would not even go to the hospital after this. New evidence is showing that electricity can be a cure for all kinds of venomous bites, including bees, spiders, mosquitoes and snakes. Snake venom is made up of mainly proteins and enzymes which are chemically bonded together and therefore make them impossible for your body to assimilate in any beneficial way. However, electricity breaks those bonds allowing your body to take in the protein and it turns out to be beneficial to you. So in the pre-Flood world, after the curse, if you were bit by a snake, it wouldn't affect you because of the higher electromagnetic field. Also, the wound from the bite would heal much faster because the higher oxygen and pressure would aid in the healing.

The Brown Recluse Spider is one of the most dreadful of all spiders. When you get bit by a Brown Recluse it literally rots your flesh down to the bone. One 10 year old girl bit by a Brown Recluse Spider (Fiddle back) was zapped on top of the bite while being grounded underneath the bite (under the arm). In 24 hours, all was gone. In fact, the Oklahoma State Medical Journal recorded that from September of 1988 to September of 1989, 21 cases were confirmed where a Brown Recluse Spider bite had been "zapped" for treatment and all cases were cured within one treatment (Osborn, p.9).

Regarding snakes, Dr Ronald Guderian, a missionary doctor from Seattle has successfully treated more than 60 humans with snakebites by electric shock. Tests have shown that the enzymes in snake venom are destructive to human tissue but when these enzymes are first "zapped" and than put in test tubes with human flesh, they no longer destroy the tissue (Outdoor Life, June 1988, p.66-68).

One farmer was stung by a bee and was deathly allergic to bee stings so he began running to his house. On the way he felt his chest beginning to tighten. In his preoccupied state, he tripped over an electric fence. Need I say more? (Outdoor Life, July 88, p76).

Many other examples have been recorded showing us what a great world the pre-Flood world must have been. If the world was like this, how come we are just discovering this now? We aren't discovering it, rather rediscovering it today! Ancient batteries have been found in Egypt showing not only the intelligence of man but perhaps also past medical treatments. For years, scientists did not know what these batteries were used for but new findings show much historical evidence relating electric shock to medicine. Electric fish were used for medicinal purposes by the Greeks and Romans while bronze and iron needles with electrical devices have been found in Seleucia which may have been used for acupuncture (which was already a standard practice in China). The ancient Scribonius Largus wrote, "For any sort of foot gout, when the pain comes on it is good to put a living black torpedo fish under his feet while standing on the beach, not dry but one on which the sea washes, until he feels that his whole foot and ankle are numb up to the knees" (Creation Ex Nihilo, Vol. 16:2, p.12). All of this points to a forgotten age where memories of higher electric fields once aided in the fighting of diseases and other common ailments.

Combine all of the evidence above and we may have the answer to why not only plants were larger in the fossil record but animals as well. It appears nearly everything was better in the past. Dragon flies had wing spans up to 60 inches, cockroaches were a foot long, Bison stood 10 feet at the shoulders and the Saber tooth tiger stood 6 feet at the shoulders (Baugh, Battle). Meanwhile plants which are only 20 inches today were 120 feet as seen in the fossil record (Sounds like a cherry tomato plant doesn't it?).


___________________

Old Post Dec-29-2004 22:01  Korea-Democratic Peoples Republic
Click Here to See the Profile for Krypton Click here to Send Krypton a Private Message Visit Krypton's homepage! Add Krypton to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23



Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas

quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
Why you can never believe the Bible as fact:
Isaiah 64:4 For since the beginning of the world [men] have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, beside thee, [what] he hath prepared for him that waiteth for him.

1 Corinthians 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.

Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

Why I just can't quote the Bible to an atheist:
Matthew 7:6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.


can u quote a translation of the bible that doesnt use english from monarchial england of 500 years ago. a bit out-dated and harder to understand. use the amplified or NIV versions.


___________________

Old Post Dec-29-2004 22:04  Korea-Democratic Peoples Republic
Click Here to See the Profile for Krypton Click here to Send Krypton a Private Message Visit Krypton's homepage! Add Krypton to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ogvh5150
Formula 1 Addict



Registered: Aug 2003
Location: F1 2008 Red Bull Racing/BMW Sauber

Aside from the use of such words as nor, hath and thee, I believe the text is as simple as it is.

Is there a German equivalent to the King James that might help you?


___________________

Old Post Dec-30-2004 00:30 
Click Here to See the Profile for ogvh5150 Click here to Send ogvh5150 a Private Message Add ogvh5150 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
im going have this summerized. the firmament article is basically the basic case for creation. i havnt found anything u guys have put up to discredit anything in it, other than "its myth", "its not scientific", blah. so lets start with it. the scholar who wrote it has a lot more knowledge than me on the subject, and so this article can make my case better than i can in my own research and words. so, now, i ask that either of you show your case against the subjects talked about in this article. no personal opinions stating facts.


It's pointless to repost the article since I've already mentioned quite a few great errors and misconceptions in it. Which ones exactly do you find problematic?

quote:
example: hydrogen doesnt glow pink, it glows orange. u may be right, but how can i find out for sure?? show me something i can see for myself if it's right.


Eh, now that I've looked it up a bit, hydrogen gas does seem to glow red or violet when it is exposed to very high levels of UV radiation emitted by stars several thousand times larger than our sun http://www.sr.bham.ac.uk/~da/eic/colours.html
http://www.esa.int/export/esaSC/SEM...nsations_0.html
or when it's highly charged with electric particles http://www.uncp.edu/home/mcclurem/ptable/h.htm. Otherwise it glows orange as seen here http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...leases/2003/13/ (lower right part of the pic). But let's make one thing clear here. For hydrogen to glow it must be very hot (several thousand K) and in gaseous form, and for it to glow pink, it must absorb few thousand times higher amounts of UV radiation than our sun can produce (notice how it glows pink only around the hot and large blue stars, in the middle of the galaxy it glows yellow-orange). Anyway, if hydrogen was gaseous and glowing, that means that the oxygen around the supposed firmament was also in gaseous form and there was no water above the firmament, just a big hot plasma cloud of mixed hydrogen and oxygen. Therefore removing the firmament would do nothing at all, the cloud would still be floating around. The oxygen glows blue (the upper left part of the pic from the last link) so the overall color of the cloud would be some sort of a brown-violet. What is also worthy to note is that solar wind would blow off such a plasma cloud in several years, if not sooner.

quote:
and ill say, u two are very formiable debators.


Maybe because we have innumerable observable facts on our side.

Anyway, my last post didn't come through completely, so here's the ending:

er because of solar radiation or any other external influences. Those cancers do not have any interaction with the genes of your offspring because the only place where your genetic code is altered is in the cancerous spot and not in your testicles.

quote:
well, i didnt catch that. can u repeat it. but are going to say that our medical knowledge doesnt influence our longevity. that the cures of diseases doesnt increase our life expectancy. the extinction of several once common diseases dont play a role in our longevity?? having to work less hard doesnt influence our longevity either?? please explain...


I was reffering to oxygen density and solar radiation.


___________________
1+1=10

Last edited by DrUg_Tit0 on Dec-30-2004 at 00:52

Old Post Dec-30-2004 00:45  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for DrUg_Tit0 Click here to Send DrUg_Tit0 a Private Message Add DrUg_Tit0 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23



Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas

quote:
Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
It's pointless to repost the article since I've already mentioned quite a few great errors and misconceptions in it. Which ones exactly do you find problematic?


there was so much to read from both of u, i want to filter everything else out, and focus on the article, because it makes a very good case scientifically for creationism.

quote:
Hydrogen when excited by energy glows pink. This could perhaps indicate why plants in the pre-Flood world grew much more abundantly than today (by hundreds of feet). This is not to say that the earth would appear pink but rather pink light would be given off. It would be similar to looking through a pair of pink sunglasses where the world does not appear pink but rather all colors appear more vividly. Research has shown that plants grow better in pink light which fits the firmament model exactly (Scientific American, April 1988, p.32).


quote:
Eh, now that I've looked it up a bit, hydrogen gas does seem to glow red or violet when it is exposed to very high levels of UV radiation emitted by stars several thousand times larger than our sun http://www.sr.bham.ac.uk/~da/eic/colours.html
http://www.esa.int/export/esaSC/SEM...nsations_0.html
or when it's highly charged with electric particles http://www.uncp.edu/home/mcclurem/ptable/h.htm. Otherwise it glows orange as seen here http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/ne...leases/2003/13/ (lower right part of the pic). But let's make one thing clear here. For hydrogen to glow it must be very hot (several thousand K) and in gaseous form, and for it to glow pink, it must absorb few thousand times higher amounts of UV radiation than our sun can produce (notice how it glows pink only around the hot and large blue stars, in the middle of the galaxy it glows yellow-orange). Anyway, if hydrogen was gaseous and glowing, that means that the oxygen around the supposed firmament was also in gaseous form and there was no water above the firmament, just a big hot plasma cloud of mixed hydrogen and oxygen. Therefore removing the firmament would do nothing at all, the cloud would still be floating around. The oxygen glows blue (the upper left part of the pic from the last link) so the overall color of the cloud would be some sort of a brown-violet. What is also worthy to note is that solar wind would blow off such a plasma cloud in several years, if not sooner.


quoting one of the sites you listed..

"Many gases glow with a characteristic color when electricity is passed through an evacuated tube containing the gas. For hydrogen, a violet-pink glow is observed. The spectrum is actually composed of four different lines, arising from four energy transitions within the atom." http://www.uncp.edu/home/mcclurem/ptable/h.htm

this only says, that when electricity passes through, the color which hydrogen shows is pink. doesnt even mention ultra violet radiation. though that could play a part as well.

quote:
Maybe because we have innumerable observable facts on our side.

Anyway, my last post didn't come through completely, so here's the ending:

er because of solar radiation or any other external influences. Those cancers do not have any interaction with the genes of your offspring because the only place where your genetic code is altered is in the cancerous spot and not in your testicles.


ahh, but see, u dont. evolution hasnt been observed. niether has creation, but we have accounts of the very very early early history of man, that hasnt been proven false, and the world in which he lived in. as u see, creation also has evidence to support its case, even though its basis is biblical, this article uses scientific observation to make its case. i see no bible-thumping there.

quote:
er because of solar radiation or any other external influences. Those cancers do not have any interaction with the genes of your offspring because the only place where your genetic code is altered is in the cancerous spot and not in your testicles.


i already conceded your point. i agree with you.

quote:
I was reffering to oxygen density and solar radiation.


the experiments with the hyperbolic chamber have proven that oxygen density with corresponding atmospheric pressure is extremely beneficial to the longevity of life. solar radiation reduced longevity because of its harmful effects to the skin. with firmament there, early humans would have been protected.


___________________

Old Post Dec-30-2004 02:57  Korea-Democratic Peoples Republic
Click Here to See the Profile for Krypton Click here to Send Krypton a Private Message Visit Krypton's homepage! Add Krypton to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23



Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas

ugh, my head hurts



quote:
Aside from the use of such words as nor, hath and thee, I believe the text is as simple as it is.

Is there a German equivalent to the King James that might help you?


The German New Testament in 1529 written by Martin Luther. but that is difficult in itself. sentence structures are different and there are so many archiac words, that its hard to understand most of it unless u study the grammar. this is why the NIV version is so popular. i prefer the Amplified Version even better because its in my understanding of english. i dont even have to look twice at a passage.


___________________

Old Post Dec-30-2004 03:13  Korea-Democratic Peoples Republic
Click Here to See the Profile for Krypton Click here to Send Krypton a Private Message Visit Krypton's homepage! Add Krypton to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DrUg_Tit0
e^(i*pi)+1=0



Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
there was so much to read from both of u, i want to filter everything else out, and focus on the article, because it makes a very good case scientifically for creationism.


Well, yeah, but I've already answered most of it. Look, it takes you 5 minutes to copy-paste such an article and it takes me 2 hours to think about it and to disprove the major nonsenses. That's why I'm not going that much in depth. As I've said, if any of my points is unclear, I'll be glad to go further in depth, but I really don't have the time to write 15 page long essays explaining every single misconception in detail that the article contains.


quote:
quoting one of the sites you listed..

"Many gases glow with a characteristic color when electricity is passed through an evacuated tube containing the gas. For hydrogen, a violet-pink glow is observed. The spectrum is actually composed of four different lines, arising from four energy transitions within the atom." http://www.uncp.edu/home/mcclurem/ptable/h.htm

this only says, that when electricity passes through, the color which hydrogen shows is pink. doesnt even mention ultra violet radiation. though that could play a part as well.


You can see the UV effect on other sites. Basically it's the same thing because both electricity and UV light ionize the atoms which then start to emit photons of that wavelenght.

quote:
ahh, but see, u dont. evolution hasnt been observed. niether has creation, but we have accounts of the very very early early history of man, that hasnt been proven false, and the world in which he lived in. as u see, creation also has evidence to support its case, even though its basis is biblical, this article uses scientific observation to make its case. i see no bible-thumping there.


Yes, it has been observed. Check out that worm breeding research I quoted from Opus from one of previous discussions on the topic. And eh, yes, the article does not base its research on the bible, but on many incorrect premises. I've mentioned the major fallacies earlier, and as I've said, if you want me to elaborate on specific points ok, but I'm not spending the whole day to explain every single incorrect point the article raises.

quote:
the experiments with the hyperbolic chamber have proven that oxygen density with corresponding atmospheric pressure is extremely beneficial to the longevity of life. solar radiation reduced longevity because of its harmful effects to the skin. with firmament there, early humans would have been protected.


Like I said before, hyperbaric (increased pressure, hyperbolic means in a shape of a hyperbole -> ')(') oxygen treatment is useful for treating a range of deseases, especially those related to insufficient oxygenation of body cells (wow, guess that!), but prolonged exposure to increased amounts of oxygen, be it hyperbaric or not, produces toxic effects, probably because of too many free radicals but I'll ask Opus to confirm that. Same goes for any other medicine, including aspirin, penicillin, antibiotics...they can all be good at specific times, but a long exposure to them has its own harmful effects. Regardless of that, if we were living in perfect conditions, it is estimated that our genes are set for a lifespan of about 100-120 years on average. Anyway, this is more Opus's field than mine, so he might elaborate more on this one.


___________________
1+1=10

Old Post Dec-30-2004 14:10  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for DrUg_Tit0 Click here to Send DrUg_Tit0 a Private Message Add DrUg_Tit0 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
ogvh5150
Formula 1 Addict



Registered: Aug 2003
Location: F1 2008 Red Bull Racing/BMW Sauber

quote:
Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
ugh, my head hurts
The German New Testament in 1529 written by Martin Luther. but that is difficult in itself. sentence structures are different and there are so many archiac words, that its hard to understand most of it unless u study the grammar. this is why the NIV version is so popular. i prefer the Amplified Version even better because its in my understanding of english. i dont even have to look twice at a passage.


I was thinking about that version myself. As long as 1 John 5:7 is the same in the Luther version as the King James:
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
This indeed would be an authentic text.


___________________

Old Post Dec-30-2004 16:26 
Click Here to See the Profile for ogvh5150 Click here to Send ogvh5150 a Private Message Add ogvh5150 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City

quote:
Originally posted by DrUg_Tit0
Well, yeah, but I've already answered most of it. Look, it takes you 5 minutes to copy-paste such an article and it takes me 2 hours to think about it and to disprove the major nonsenses. That's why I'm not going that much in depth. As I've said, if any of my points is unclear, I'll be glad to go further in depth, but I really don't have the time to write 15 page long essays explaining every single misconception in detail that the article contains.


Agreed. Very little time today to go over it in detail. And besides, what I did cover in the article previously (without my personal opinion on the matter) was pretty much the only area I'm a bit comfortable with. The area of geology and geophysics I'll have to leave for someone else.

quote:
Yes, it has been observed. Check out that worm breeding research I quoted from Opus from one of previous discussions on the topic. And eh, yes, the article does not base its research on the bible, but on many incorrect premises. I've mentioned the major fallacies earlier, and as I've said, if you want me to elaborate on specific points ok, but I'm not spending the whole day to explain every single incorrect point the article raises.


DrUg_Tit0 is certainly correct, it has been observed many times over in both the field and in the lab. If you want more citations, I'll be happy to supply them.

But I'm guessing that this is not exactly what you mean, that NO evolution has been observed. If this is what you mean (TranceVanDyk), then I'll have to say that you're in a very very very small minority of even the creationist camp. Most creationists I've ever engaged debates with, even YEC's concede that evolution does occur, but they often categorize it into two areas - "microevolution" and "macroevolution". The example like the polychaete worms would be one in which a YEC would concede "microevolution". But it's the so-called "macroevolution" step which creationists do not acknowledge. Without going into too much detail, evolutionists see absolutely no difference between the two. IOW, "macro" is merely further down the limbs of a bush than "micro". Think of it this way - when you leave your house and walk around with no destination in mind (remember that part), the so-called "micro" evolution would be equivalent to say leaving your porch, and the so-called "macro" evolution would be equivalent to being outside your neighbor's house down the street. It's merely a matter of distance in time via morphological differences as a consequence of reproductive barriers of some sort (sorry if that's confusing), and the key here is there's no endpoint in sight (i.e. no destination).

Acknowledging the fact of the so-called "micro" evolution isn't difficult even for the most ardent creationists, it's applying this fact to the theory of evolution, i.e. the best explanation for the vast morphological differences between all the various organisms on the planet over time, or as creationists call "macro" evolution, is what gets them a bit tripped up. The problem for the creationists, however, is the vast wealth of evidence that supports this explanation or theory. Keep in mind that it is merely the best explanation, and scientists would love nothing better than to come up with a new explanation to explain such events. Believe me, scientists LIVE for shit like this - finding a new theory that overturns old ones. You have to realize that evolutionists actually test their own theory every single day. It just keeps working for them, and the predictions that evolution offers them keep turning out to be correct.

Any other theories have been subject to testing and scrutiny, and NONE have held up to testable, verifiable, or observable scientific standards, and this includes any and ALL creationist postulations and claims. Can you possibly imagine just for one moment what the field of genetics would look like if they utilized creationist claims instead of evolutionary algorythms for their research? I shudder to think just how little progress we would actually make in such an area. Or how about geological studies? Would it surprise you to know that oil companies hire geologists that utilize evolutionary theory and the Old Earth to help them find oil? What would it be like if these geologists actually believed in a Young Earth and had to apply such creationist claims to find oil? They would not be in business for very long.

So keep in mind that scientists love nothing better than to be the discoverers of new theories that topple old ones. But this simply hasn't happened in the case of evolution. I assure you it is not some kind of conspiracy the fact that no public university teaches Intelligent Design or any Creationist claim in the science classrooms. It just simply isn't science, and they cannot utilize such claims in their work, period.

quote:
Like I said before, hyperbaric (increased pressure, hyperbolic means in a shape of a hyperbole -> ')(') oxygen treatment is useful for treating a range of deseases, especially those related to insufficient oxygenation of body cells (wow, guess that!), but prolonged exposure to increased amounts of oxygen, be it hyperbaric or not, produces toxic effects, probably because of too many free radicals but I'll ask Opus to confirm that. Same goes for any other medicine, including aspirin, penicillin, antibiotics...they can all be good at specific times, but a long exposure to them has its own harmful effects. Regardless of that, if we were living in perfect conditions, it is estimated that our genes are set for a lifespan of about 100-120 years on average. Anyway, this is more Opus's field than mine, so he might elaborate more on this one.


Crap, now I'm really running late. Well in short, he's absolutely correct. O2 is extremely toxic via free radicals that destroy cells at too high levels. But the entire article goes on the bogus premise that we're dealing with a young earth. As I mentioned previously, this would be breaking a number of laws of physics if it were true. The creationist claim on this is usually that the dating methodology is flawed somehow. I suggest you read this thread below for our explanaton on that. I believe it starts here:

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...on&pagenumber=5


___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

Old Post Dec-30-2004 17:21  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MisterOpus1 Click here to Send MisterOpus1 a Private Message Add MisterOpus1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23



Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas

higher amounts of oxygen with a proportionally higher atmospheric pressure is not toxic.

quote:
Another beneficial effect of the firmament would be greater air pressure with higher oxygen (Higher oxygen without the higher air pressure would be toxic). Secular evidence from trapped air bubbles in fossilized amber shows that before the Flood we had roughly twice the atmospheric pressure and 30-35% oxygen (compared to the current 21%) (Science, Vol. 239, p. 1406). However, new evidence has caused creationists to feel this is too high because oxygen poisoning would result and therefore a better estimate may be from 23 to 25%.


___________________

Old Post Dec-30-2004 18:09  Korea-Democratic Peoples Republic
Click Here to See the Profile for Krypton Click here to Send Krypton a Private Message Visit Krypton's homepage! Add Krypton to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
TheVrk
Mediterranean Canadian



Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Windsor, Canada

will never happen obv

Old Post Dec-30-2004 19:15  Croatia
Click Here to See the Profile for TheVrk Click here to Send TheVrk a Private Message Visit TheVrk's homepage! Add TheVrk to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > What would the consequences be if Christianity and Islam were merged?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (11): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackID This Tune Plz. =) Listen [2002] [2]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackThe Squad - "Licht und Schall" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:31.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!