|
| quote: | Originally posted by astroboy
Actually a whole bunch of dudes wrote a whol ebunch of different books some about one God, some included a female Goddess, some had one version of doctrine others had other versions, some had crazy shit aboiut angels and demons etc... then a bunch of important church dudes had a little meeting and decided which parts were going to be official, which parts were apocryphal and which parts were heresy and put all the official parts into what we now know as the bible.... |
yea, its called the canon, the measure or "evaluation" of a book based on "divine inspiration", inspiration by god, the author's credibility, its doctrinal content, and authority. the entire new testament was written by eye-witnesses to jesus's ministry or knew one of the disciples of jesus. example, Luke never met jesus, but he was very well aquainted with the disciples.
yet, with the apocraphe's, there were doctrinal errors, or the author's credibility was in question. for example, the gospel of thomas. the early church fathers really didnt know whether the disciple thomas really wrote this book, also the book contained several questionable things in it to rule it out of canon. there were many fakes, and only unless there was a "without a doubt" knowledge, was the book considered a canon. also, some of the author's never met jesus or his disciples which automatically ruled them out.
___________________
|