|
when you really think about it, does any genre have "rules" that define it? All of these rules seem to be flexible to a certain extent. I mean, what exactly is trance? What exactly is progressive? What exactly is breakbeats?
These things change, these things are flexible, the borders between these things are fuzzy. Surely you would think that we could compensate for this flexibility by having tolerance for assertions that lie near the borders of these flexible rules, unfortunately everybody thinks these rules are written in stone and claims they are the objective truth. I think what is really happening here, is that there is a flexibility in all the definitions we use. As a result, our opinions should be equally flexible, or at least open to the possibility that a person can understand these things differently without neccesarily being wrong or dumb or a noob.
It is in some aspects a matter of opinion, I am not suggesting that we all subscribe to postmodernism and give up on all attemps of identifying standards and taking sides. Postmodern "everything is reletive" thought is equally as stupid as assuming that you are right and everybody else is wrong, the real answer is in recognizing stucture while also accepting the possiblity for those structures to be somewhat flexible. It is the "engineering approximation" applied to music, sure there are rules, but there is flexibility, there is tolerance, and things change rapidly.
Last edited by Zombie0915 on Mar-31-2006 at 21:50
|