|
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
fuck i hate those arguments. oh- i dont believe there was a massive conspiracy re the moon landing so im close-minded? or, having an opinion at all makes one close-minded. the only people that subscribe to such beliefs are fickle cretins easily swayed anywhere coz they just cant make up their mind.
rightyo, id like a list of every person that would have to be a part of this conspiracy for it to be effected. id like to know what exactly the space missions were doing whilst everyone in the world was watching them and the fake landing was broadcast across the world, id like to know where they got the moon rocks from, id like to know what exactly the astronomers were tracking at the time of the supposed landing, and id like to know why such a conspiracy would ever be able to be kept quite, with so so many people necessarily in the loop.
see, this is the conspiracy theorists problem: they can point at a tiniest thing (like a photo they dont think looks legit) but simply cant answer all the other questions. its bullshit, and i treat it accordingly. im not close-minded coz i use logic over bullshit.
you can take your photos and look at them upside down and back to front, but that aint gonna do anything to all the other evidence people choose to ignore. i cant stand intellectually dishonest people. |
I never said I didnt have opinions. Keeping an open mind is important for debate. Until you can accept that you might be wrong you cant possibly argue your side with any accuracy. How can I respect your opinion if you dont respect mine? In my opinion, the moon landing did happen. There is indeed a lot of evidence that cannot be rationally answered to disprove it, but a lot of things are brought up that seem a bit fishy, and, in keeping an open mind, I fully accept that it may have never happened and it might be a big hoax. Why did I argue against the genuineness of that photo? To spark debate. Its fun. 
|