|
| quote: | Originally posted by lücid
i disagree. i mean it's a great concept in theory, and i always get excited when i find out that one of my favorite books is being made into a movie... but 9 times out of 10, they just suck.
unless the director and cast are amazing, i'm usually just really unimpressed by movies based on books. too many of them get the "Hollywood" treatment and they just lose the feel of the original story.
|
For the most part, I agree with you. However, I think there are a lot of solid adaptations, especially as of late. I think one of the best has been Christopher Nolan (all of his Hollywood releases: Memento, The Prestige, the Batman series have been adaptations). Sin City is another example of a great adaptation, and a ballsy one at that. You also have the fantasy novel adaptations: Lord of the Rings series and Chornicles of Narnia, both effectively done.
I think the difficulty in adapting some of these books to the screen could arise for two reasons. First, often with a book you really can get in the characters head, hear their thoughts. With a movie you can't, aside from voice over's which must be used sparingly. So, while you may have a book that has excellent characterization, this could be all internaly happening and therefore would make for a piss-poor movie. Second, the story can be too "big" for a movie. I think this was demonstrated with the Da Vinci Code, as there was so much action that they tried to condense into the movie, there was absolutely 0 depth to it.
All that being said, I think with the number of successful and failed adaptations,you will probably always be wrong if you were to say adaptations aren't effective.
___________________
Lost Souls
|