quote:

Originally posted by Groundhog Boy I dunno, you tell me if you're older. My age is in my profile. I don't have a problem with people disagreeing with me on here if they can at least validate it, which you've yet to do with anyone you've responded to. Also, the inferences that you make on here just astound me. You have a serious problem with jumping to conclusions and it impairs your arguments. And go ahead and keep repeatedly calling everyone names on here. It scores you and your arguments a ton of points.

You gonna sit their and call me a kid, then I'll respond back. You took a personal stab at me so I did the same. Oh and calling you arrogant is not a name. Everybody has oponions, and of course we're all going to flame eachother for it at one point. Iam not the first to do that nor the last. I did not jump to conclusions, I saw the same video as you.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by TheDemon You gonna sit their and call me a kid, then I'll respond back. You took a personal stab at me so I did the same. Oh and calling you arrogant is not a name.

Well, your juvenile arguments make you sound like one.

___________________
"Go back to bed america your government is in control
Here's American Gladiators, here is 56 channels of it,
Watch these picturary retards bang their fuckin' skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom,
Here you go America you are free to do as we tell you
We want your soul
Your cash, your house, your phone, your cash, your house, your life" -Adam Freeland - We Want Your Soul

quote:

Originally posted by Groundhog Boy Well, your juvenile arguments make you sound like one.

And as if your arguments are of the highest quality.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by TheDemon And as if your arguments are of the highest quality.

How would you know? No one in this forum knows who you are, so I'm doubting you've read many of my arguments.

___________________
"Go back to bed america your government is in control
Here's American Gladiators, here is 56 channels of it,
Watch these picturary retards bang their fuckin' skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom,
Here you go America you are free to do as we tell you
We want your soul
Your cash, your house, your phone, your cash, your house, your life" -Adam Freeland - We Want Your Soul

quote:

Originally posted by Fir3start3r "Shooting my mouth off" hmmm....care to point out where I did that? All I said was that the guy was an idiot for not complying with authority. Actually I think the word used was, "Asshat" to be totally correct. So at what point does authority NOT do their job? Just because the guy screams like a girl in defiance, we're supposed to feel sorry for him and be more 'humane'? Please. Stop being a patsy. I can't feel sorry for anyone trying to be a hero when they're clearly in the wrong. Sure it sounded bad but let's not forget he escalated it to that level. If he had just complied when he was asked NONE of this would have happened, never mind the local campus guys calling in actual authority WITH the tasers. At what point exactly are we supposed to feel remorse for this goof? All he got were some good shocks when didn't he didn't do what he was told; wow. The only thing hurt was his pride apparently since he still has the gumption to go out, seek a lawyer and sue. If I'm wrong then I'll appoligize later but I'm not betting on it. Until that point we'll just have to wait for the inquiry, so let's stop with all this bs about him being a victim until the facts are out.

Yes very well put. Only an Inhumane person like you would post something as rude and ridiculous like that. Buddy, you got fucking issues. Mouthing off, accepting the fact that this poor guy had to go through with that. While his actions might not have been right {if it is proven that he was being rude, not physical with the police, only verbaly)two wrongs don't make a right. If he was wrong, the police were also wrong in how they approached the situation. but of course you don't care, its your sadistic nature.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Groundhog Boy How would you know? No one in this forum knows who you are, so I'm doubting you've read many of my arguments.

And who are you? are you some important person here? I've been on these forums for a long time but I never consider myself higher than other people. oh, so now people have to know me so I can post on this forum. I've been here longer than you. I've seen many flame wars on these forums many times worse than this.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by TheDemon And who are you? are you some important person here? I've been on these forums for a long time but I never consider myself higher than other people. oh, so now people have to know me so I can post on this forum. I've been here longer than you. I've seen many flame wars on these forums many times worse than this.

You take mis-infering to a new level.

I didn't say anything about you not being able to post. I just responded to your comment about how I don't make high quality arguments. Unless you're some long time PDD lurker, you probably haven't seen too many of my arguments, therefore you don't have much right to comment, do you?

___________________
"Go back to bed america your government is in control
Here's American Gladiators, here is 56 channels of it,
Watch these picturary retards bang their fuckin' skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom,
Here you go America you are free to do as we tell you
We want your soul
Your cash, your house, your phone, your cash, your house, your life" -Adam Freeland - We Want Your Soul

quote:

Originally posted by TheDemon You have a nice way of twisting peoples words. I can see you really can't take criticizm. God, how childish can you be? Oh and when i said learn english, grammar had nothing to do with itI was being rhetorical. Oh pls, go ahead and give one your 50 page response to this one. You are the of the utmost highest arrogant loser.

Hmm, let's recap:

1. You came here presenting an argument that this was racially influenced. We have yet to see any of the evidence presented from you that bolsters your case.

2. You came here presenting an argument that a YouTube recording of a guy getting stoned and commenting in a rather muffled and incoherent manner was somehow insightful. When presented with supporting your argument that this is some how insightful, you resort to criticism of the posts themselves rather than defend your argument in any way.

3. You came here criticizing other well-known posters on their English skills when in fact you have demonstrated a level of English and grammer equivalent to that of a 7th grader. I'm sorry if you feel such correction is being "childish", but being childish is truly the tip of the iceberg in defining your posts here.

Finally, if you feel I have twisted your words, please for the love of God point out where I have somewhere wronged you and twisted what you were attempting to say. And please be specific so we can all understand your point of view better.

Was this too long for you? I tried to make it short enough for you to get through it a little quicker for your comprehension.

___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

quote:

Originally posted by TheDemon Yes very well put. Only an Inhumane person like you would post something as rude and ridiculous like that. Buddy, you got fucking issues. Mouthing off, accepting the fact that this poor guy had to go through with that. While his actions might not have been right {if it is proven that he was being rude, not physical with the police, only verbaly)two wrongs don't make a right. If he was wrong, the police were also wrong in how they approached the situation. but of course you don't care, its your sadistic nature.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe my colleague here a few posts back mentioned that I had essentially paraphrased his argument. Since he and I are seemingly in agreeance with one another, perhaps you can point out in my argument that I posted earlier to which he agreed with and tell us where you might have a point of contention.

I think that would be the most appropriate place to go first before we move forward.

___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

quote:

Originally posted by TheDemon So your lazy too. Figures.

Let's recap:

2. You came here presenting an argument that a YouTube recording of a guy getting stoned and commenting in a rather muffled and incoherent manner was somehow insightful. When presented with supporting your argument that this is some how insightful, you resort to criticism of the posts themselves rather than defend your argument in any way.

Since you brought the argument that this video is insightful, and that there may be other videos are insightful as well, it is not my responsibility to somehow see if your argument is valid or not by going on a scavenger hunt for you.

You presented the argument, therefore it is upon you to defend it. So please bring forth these videos that are supposedly as insightful as the one you exhibited earlier. Is this really that difficult for you? Are you having any troubles with this?

___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

quote:

Originally posted by Groundhog Boy You take mis-infering to a new level. I didn't say anything about you not being able to post. I just responded to your comment about how I don't make high quality arguments. Unless you're some long time PDD lurker, you probably haven't seen too many of my arguments, therefore you don't have much right to comment, do you?

Do you know me? you prejudged me and called me a juvenile just baed on a few comments I made. Can you justify that? I haven't misinterperted anything you said. You calling me a kid was one thing, but doing it purely on prejudice wasn't warranted. So you too jumped to a conclusion without much merit.

___________________