 |
|
|
|
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SuperJimbo
Regardless, even if they didn't know, I think they should be held accountable. Such is life when sh*t goes down on your watch. |
Strange, that's not how it works in any other industry.
Mine is IT. A simple example is if the CTO or one of the sysadmins decides to use bootleg software instead of licensing it legally. It's only the CEO's responsibility if there's clear evidence that he was advised of what was going on and what the consequences were. Some shadier CEOs try to maneuver themselves into a plausible deniability situation, and any IT professional worth his salt is always very careful to leave an e-mail trail because he knows he'll be the one liable if CAST comes sniffing.
SEOs do all sorts of dirty tricks to boost search engine rankings. A lot of them are against the TOS or just downright illegal. The people who hired them are not liable because the SEOs never actually tell anyone what they do.
Christopher Lawrence could probably never legitimately score in the top 10 in a popularity contest, that's true, but he's always been reasonably high on the top 100, and I think he's earned at least that much legitimately. Almost every kind of marketing is a little bit shady, a little bit on the weasel side to begin with, so Christopher Lawrence might have been suspicious, but his marketing manager could have offered any number of unlikely but plausible excuses: sock puppets, spam, sex, free beer, whatever. Really good marketing can do all sorts of seemingly-impossible things.
The reality is that people generally aren't liable for things that happen "on their watch", legally or morally, unless their own responsibilities specifically include... well, watching those things. In my IT example for instance, if one of the grunts installs pirated software or uses the mail server to send out spam, the responsibility does generally fall to the CTO because it's his job to stay on top of this. But it doesn't extend further, all the way to the CEO, because the CEO has no involvement whatsoever in that aspect of the business. Same if one of the accountants is cooking the books. If the accountant was stupid and didn't leave any sort of a paper trail to the CEO, then it's the accountant who takes the heat.
DJ Dan and Christopher Lawrence probably have very little involvement in their marketing managers' day-to-day activities. I know that if I were in their position, I wouldn't really give a flying fuck what he was doing to get me contracts, as long as he was getting me contracts. I'd obviously fire him if I found out that he was doing anything sketchy - and that's exactly what the DJs did.
Surely if the DJs authorized it, then this guy would have been careful enough to get it in writing?
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
Oct-11-2007 01:00
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:02.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|