|
I think "disqualifying" DJs might be a tad brash. I mean, there are certainly instances where the DJ is probably involved, but hurting them when there's a good chance they weren't involved but their management had something to do with it.
I don't think some of these DJs would dare to a chance of being caught cheating like this knowing how much it could tarnish their image.
AS people have said, DJMag is a (stupid) marketing tool for DJs. It certainly impacts your booking fee.
What I could have done is 1) In cases where there are several votes from the same IP, try to learn if that IP is a corporpation or ISP that could possibly use NATing. Some ISPs like AOL use NATing because the world is getting short on IP addresses. So THOUSANDS of people will show up online under the same IP address. In these cases, I'd allow two of the votes to count. In other cases, just make it so only one of the IP address count.
Or just make it all easy and make it only one vote per IP address.
Their ranking will be impact greatly right there, but they could still end up being ranked somewhere that more accurately reflects where they would be without any cheating having been involved.
From there, put them on probation for like five years and if it happens again, then ban them from that year and any future DJ polls. 
In the end if CL's and DJ Dan's old marketing manager certainly caused his fiasco on his own, I hope he is raped of all his assets and money. This type of thing could really tarnish their image when it comes to people who don't know the whole story or don't believe they really didn't have anything to do with it themselves. It really sucks for CL more than Dan in the end as CL is certainly one of the best there is.
Dave
|