quote:

Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles I think it's mostly an issue of trust. If you're dating somebody whose normal operating mode is "screw and go," how sure are you really going to feel that they won't treat you the same way?

Well, maybe it's just me but that seems about 100 times more palatable than the opposite ("no sex but clingy.")

It seems to me that if a woman has had too few sexual partners, one of the following likely applies:

1. She's insecure about sex/doesn't have much of a sex drive. [NO THANKS]
2. She's a vacuous robot responding to social pressures regarding the supposed "immorality" of promiscuous behavior. [UGH!]
3. She's extremely clingy and tenaciously latches on to the first cock that she comes across. [DANGER, DANGER!]

There are certainly a few exceptions, but I'd say that covers the vast majority of them.

I don't want to paint you with the wrong brush, but it seems to me that most guys who frown on women having too many partners do so because they are afraid they won't stack up (and they may well be right in that regard.) That, or they're living in some ridiculous fruity fantasy world and believe that their soul mate is out there somewhere waiting for them and no one else and it's their destiny to find THE ONE and marry them and have, like, a million babies! I would rant on, but I don't want to lose my dinner.

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter Well, maybe it's just me but that seems about 100 times more palatable than the opposite ("no sex but clingy.")

I'd rather not deal with either.

ok just to clarify here, we are discussing in the context of a relationship or someone we are looking to potentially date?

The original post sounded like "date," but the thread eventually veered toward "relationship."

quote:

Originally posted by Fibonacci ok just to clarify here, we are discussing in the context of a relationship or someone we are looking to potentially date?

Just to clarify - those are quite different, right... Date = casual, relationship = monogamous, long term?

quote:

Originally posted by Fibonacci ok just to clarify here, we are discussing in the context of a relationship or someone we are looking to potentially date?

when else would you be concerned about the number of partners?

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by bas Dual exhaust tips on dual exhaust = QUAD EXHAUST = 300 gain in horsepower. Duh

quote:

Originally posted by bas Undies with a dickhole aren't good for guys. Your balls can get caught in them. That's why I prefer to go over the gate instead of through the fence.

quote:

Originally posted by Enigmatik I'm with gehzumteufel on this one. It doesn't matter how many partners they've had as long as they were smart enough to use protection and are disease free. I know a guy that slept with every girl in his area code but used protection every time and is completely healthy and STD free, and another that slept with only 2 but was a moron and didn't use a condom and now he has herpes. :S

disease free is the way to be! haha

but seriously. i don't give a rats ass how many guys shes slept with, as long as i don't get anything due to this. if i do then its a problem.

oh and jealous guys = fucking annoying assholes. i have some female friends with jealous bf's and i want to wring their fucking necks!

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by bas Dual exhaust tips on dual exhaust = QUAD EXHAUST = 300 gain in horsepower. Duh

quote:

Originally posted by bas Undies with a dickhole aren't good for guys. Your balls can get caught in them. That's why I prefer to go over the gate instead of through the fence.

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel when else would you be concerned about the number of partners?

Actually thats how I do most of my hiring. The sheepish, nerdy engineering PhD five years my senior walks in and I ask: "how many sexual partners have you had?"

If he says anything greater than one, he's clearly a lying bastard and I not only do not hire him, but I try to get his security clearance revoked.

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter Actually thats how I do most of my hiring. The sheepish, nerdy engineering PhD five years my senior walks in and I ask: "how many sexual partners have you had?" If he says anything greater than one, he's clearly a lying bastard and I not only do not hire him, but I try to get his security clearance revoked.

LOL bs...and even if you did, as silene pointed out, the number of sexual partners doesnt define ones character. not saying that some 18yr old girl should have 100 partners but on the same token, why should she have had only 1? (this is just thought provoking, not that i think kids at 12yrs old should be having sex)

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by bas Dual exhaust tips on dual exhaust = QUAD EXHAUST = 300 gain in horsepower. Duh

quote:

Originally posted by bas Undies with a dickhole aren't good for guys. Your balls can get caught in them. That's why I prefer to go over the gate instead of through the fence.

quote:

Originally posted by gehzumteufel LOL bs...and even if you did, as silene pointed out, the number of sexual partners doesnt define ones character. not saying that some 18yr old girl should have 100 partners but on the same token, why should she have had only 1? (this is just thought provoking, not that i think kids at 12yrs old should be having sex)

Ok yeah, I completely made that up. But now that I thought of it, I must admit it's a little tempting to try to spring that question on someone in an interview...

quote:

Originally posted by Arbiter Ok yeah, I completely made that up. But now that I thought of it, I must admit it's a little tempting to try to spring that question on someone in an interview...

LOL fucking bastard.

ps: why the sn change from dark arbiter to just arbiter?

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by bas Dual exhaust tips on dual exhaust = QUAD EXHAUST = 300 gain in horsepower. Duh

quote:

Originally posted by bas Undies with a dickhole aren't good for guys. Your balls can get caught in them. That's why I prefer to go over the gate instead of through the fence.