|
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
Obama playing games with U.S. troops for his own political gain? Sounds like he's been advocating troops to stay in Iraq till 2012, while pretending like he wants troops out now to satisfy his lunitic fringe: |
I don't think the desire to withdraw from Iraq is a "lunatic fringe" issue.
| quote: | http://www.nypost.com/seven/0915200...awal_129150.htm
Hypocrisy isn’t the issue here, it’s the interference of Obama in military and diplomatic affairs. Just on diplomacy, interfering with the United States in its diplomatic efforts is a Logan Act violation. Interfering with war policy treads on even more serious ground, especially since the primary motivation appears to be winning an election without regard to whether it damages our ability to fight the enemy or drives wedges between us and our ally, the elected representative government in Baghdad. |
Do we have more than simply a a newspaper column to make these accusations? You should know columns are opinion driven.
| quote: | Originally posted by Dj Smitty20
I don't know where John McCain gets the nerve to say the US is "winning" in Iraq! Does anyone actually believe that horse shit?
There has been no dramatic fall off in violence, as Krypton has pointed out. Sure, American casualties are down, but that can and likely will change once the militant cells have time to regroup after that glorious military operation called the "Surge". John McCain goes on about it like he actually had something to do with it and was some kind of "D-Day" to the war in Iraq. What utter NONSENSE!
This violence is never going to end as long as the United States is there, plain and simple. Even after they leave, sectarian violence is highly probable. In the end, the Iraqi people are really NO BETTER OFF now than they were under Saddam Hussein and I will stand by that testament. |
Yea the "spin" is incredible. There are still suicide bombings, car bombs, kidnappings, and roadside bombs every day, and they call this winning? I call it Republican lies. Iraq is worse off than it was under Saddam Hussein and that's a proven fact. How many people would choose tyranny with security, to false democracy without security? More than you'de expect...But it was never about democracy, or even WMDs. It's about Iraq's strategic place in the world, it's weakness militarily/economically, and the convenience of 911 to blame Iraq. Notice how the "war president" hasn't even captured Osama bin Laden as he said he would..."The United States will bring those responsible to justice for these cowardly acts"...Remember that? All lies...and one more thing...anyone who would carry out an ideologically-driven act knowing full well they are going to die doing it are hardly cowards.
___________________
|