 |
|
|
|
 |
Paradox Lost
In This Twilight

Registered: Aug 2007
Location: San Francisco
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Domesticated
America has never produced a car worth owning. End of story. Ugly, technologically backward, poorly made. |
Kind of reminds me of something Jeremy Clarkson said when he was testing the Viper SRT-10: "It's internal combustion, with a hint of spontaneous combustion. It's wayward, it's backward, and I just don't care."
He ultimately walks away with favorable impressions, despite spending the largest percentage of his airtime with it listing grievance after grievance. I think it's the 'raw simplicity' (which he alludes to) of some American cars that endow them with so much appeal.
Hilarious episode, by the way:
Dodge+Viper+SRT10+Top+Gear+Road+Test+and+Review
___________________
He traded sands for skins, skins for gold, gold for life. In the end, he traded life for sand. Afari, Tales
Last edited by Paradox Lost on Dec-11-2009 at 10:42
|
|
Dec-11-2009 10:35
|
|
|
 |
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
Dec-11-2009 10:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
Dec-11-2009 11:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
Dec-11-2009 11:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
miamitranceman
Extreme tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Miami
|
|
|
http://jalopnik.com/5081442/top-gea...-they-like-them
Top Gear tested the Challenger, ZR-1, and CTS-V a few seasons ago on the Bonneville Salt Flats.
Each came away incredibly impressed. James May went to far as to say the CTS-V was by leaps and bounds the finest American Car he's ever driven.
It also, by the way, holds the title as the fastest production sedan to go around the 'Ring. I've had the pleasure of driving one..what a friggin' beast!


In the end though, it's easy to point to our supercars to use as an example. But what was said overall above about the arguement that American cars are crap should be applied 15-20 years ago is exactly on point.
Take a look at today's Ford Fusion (and Hybrid). It just won Motor Trend's Car of the year for 2010. I'd take that any day over a comparable Honda or Toyota. The quality is there, plus you get a little sportiness and excitement too. My dad and I were at a local auto show a few weeks ago, and it was amazing how when we reached the Honda and Toyota sections of the show, there was just nothing to get excited about in their current lineups in the way you could then walk over to a Camaro, Vette, or CTS, for example. It's probably why both Jap. companies are scrambling to get out a rear-drive sports car as quickly as they can.
New 2010 Buick Regal vs. a Lexus ES 350 - Buick has been wining comparisons hands down.
Buick Enclave vs. any comparable small-midsize SUV, wining as well.
Point is, from the range of $$$$ to $, you can no longer make generalized statements as Domesticated did and have any credibility among gearheads. (Unless you're talking Chrysler, so help us all.)

___________________
Click the link below to stream all of my mixes past and present. New mixes go up about once a month. Enjoy!
www.mixcloud.com/jluger
|
|
Dec-11-2009 15:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
Moongoose
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Celje, Slovenia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Paradox Lost
Oh man, my mistake! Fixed, immediately.
Anyway, I worked at a Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep dealership for a while, and yes, I can vouch for the absolute and utter mechanical ridiculousness that is the 300 lineup. I once took an SRT-8 out, and a block away from the dealership, the power steering went out. Apparently, that was a recurring problem with the 300's, so much so that the service technicians were used to it by now. Oh, and the interior felt like I was riding in a glorified bicycle.
Still, though, compared to the 'luxury interiors' of American cars from the mid to late 90's, I will gleefully roll around in one of their 2009 offerings.
As for the Cadillac you drove, did you drive the base model CTS or CTS-V? I can't verify this at the moment, but I'm fairly confident that the CTS doesn't have the 6 and 4 piston Brembo's that the CTS-V comes equipped with, which will most certainly produce a difference in stopping power between the two cars. There are also some blatant differences in interior materials. |
I drove the base CTS but still, we are talking about an reasonably upper market car here, it should not have brakes made out of butter (im exagerating a bit here the CTS does not have brakes made out of butter of course...the 300C does). Even the bottom of the range should be quite decently equipped. I wont bring out a BMW for comparison again, so i will bring out the bottom of the range E-Class instead the E200 diesel. That car was not in any way bult for speed, its suspension is soft, the engine barely turns, it takes two weeks to get from 0 to 100...bottom of the range what can one say....but the brakes they work, and the soft suspension about which you are not too sure about when driving works under braking as well. And for me, that just puts it in the lead. You may not need excellent brakes every day, o ever for that matter but one day they might come in useful and then spending a couple of thousand more will seem as a bargain compared to the alternative. I use that philosophy on my car as well. SUre it may only be a small fiat, and sure there may be a bit of rust here and there that i cant be bothered to fix because i plan to drive the car untill it falls apart and then ill replace it with another small beate for city use but the breakes and the tires...they are always in top condition.
Also theres a reason why the Buick regal gets good reviews...thats thats actually an european car 
Also the Caddy is not the fastest sedan around the ring anymore...the germans have allready reclaimed that honour with the panamera turbo 
And not all of american cars are rubbish. Some are quite good...for instance the Current gen Ford mondeo or the Ford Focus RS, Or the Ford S-max which may be the 2nd people carrier ever made that is not so embarrasing to drive that you want to shoot yourself. So not all american cars are rubbish...just most of them 
___________________
|
|
Dec-11-2009 16:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
Dec-11-2009 22:45
|
|
|
 |
 |
Fledz
Banned

Registered: Sep 2006
Location: London UK
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by miamitranceman
http://jalopnik.com/5081442/top-gea...-they-like-them
Top Gear tested the Challenger, ZR-1, and CTS-V a few seasons ago on the Bonneville Salt Flats.
Each came away incredibly impressed. James May went to far as to say the CTS-V was by leaps and bounds the finest American Car he's ever driven.
It also, by the way, holds the title as the fastest production sedan to go around the 'Ring. I've had the pleasure of driving one..what a friggin' beast!


In the end though, it's easy to point to our supercars to use as an example. But what was said overall above about the arguement that American cars are crap should be applied 15-20 years ago is exactly on point.
Take a look at today's Ford Fusion (and Hybrid). It just won Motor Trend's Car of the year for 2010. I'd take that any day over a comparable Honda or Toyota. The quality is there, plus you get a little sportiness and excitement too. My dad and I were at a local auto show a few weeks ago, and it was amazing how when we reached the Honda and Toyota sections of the show, there was just nothing to get excited about in their current lineups in the way you could then walk over to a Camaro, Vette, or CTS, for example. It's probably why both Jap. companies are scrambling to get out a rear-drive sports car as quickly as they can.
New 2010 Buick Regal vs. a Lexus ES 350 - Buick has been wining comparisons hands down.
Buick Enclave vs. any comparable small-midsize SUV, wining as well.
Point is, from the range of $$$$ to $, you can no longer make generalized statements as Domesticated did and have any credibility among gearheads. (Unless you're talking Chrysler, so help us all.)
|
Yes but why do your designers insist on making every car look so damn muscly and boxy? They must have taken the word "sleek" from their vocabulary.
It seems that the trend in American cars over the years has always been petrol guzzling, fuck off big, muscle cars.
___________________
Like Progressive and Deep House? Grab my latest mix below 
http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...s=#.UAv1rbRo3h4
|
|
Dec-11-2009 23:04
|
|
|
 |
 |
R!CH
check signal

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
|
|
|
Dec-11-2009 23:25
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:24.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|