|
| quote: | Originally posted by moth
What an interesting thread.
Chew on this:
When you are playing golf, you will look at the slopes around the path to the whole, and base how you hit the ball on those slopes to get your desired outcome. Say something out there did want to create the universe, with no mental limitations could you not agree that every desired event for all time could be calculated down to an interaction of subatomic particles?
Would you agree that if you knew the exact stage of everything in the universe, you could predict every single event to come for all time? Some of these ideas are hard to comprehend. In simpler terms, you push a ball toward another ball straight on, on a frictionless surface, no angle of incline, air resistance ignored, you know exactly what is going to happen to the other ball when they come in contact. If the conditions never change, and the ball is always rolled the exact same, the result will never change. They ways an organism react due to a certain stimulus are vastly complex and are based one thousands of conditions. BUT, could you not agree it can be calculated? Every single thing in the universe can be traced back to its origin through calculation, possibly converging on a single point in time and space, to a single event on a molecular level?
Such an event is 'god'.
(Just something a little different to throw into the mix) |
You're basically talking about determinism. I don't understand enough about quantum physics to comprehend the arguments about whether or not the universe might be deterministic.
Whether or not this requires a "first cause" is a matter of complex debate in itself, usually begging the question "what caused the first cause?"
Ultimately though, it is too vague a definition of "god" to be of any practical value. Even if such a "god" did exist, we wouldn't be able to derive any more information about it merely from that definition - certainly not any kind of moral code. Because the term "god" has such a dogmatic connotation, I don't think it would be a good choice of terminology when referring to the general idea of a "first cause".
Cheers,
Arbiter
|