|
| quote: | Originally posted by aloep
If you would actually need a thesaurus to match the vocabulary I used in my last post, then you've proved my point yet again. Cheers. 
I'm not even going to bother pointing out the sheer hypocricy detected in this line.
About the topic anyway, while it may seem like a logical assumption to say that remixing a Britney track is all about the money, it's something that you can never be sure about. Perhaps Gabriel & Dresden really like the track and have ideas in their head of what they could do with it, then there's nothing to stop them. Or perhaps they want to give themselves a challenge. Personally I think that remixing a pop song into something good, and something completely different is a very good thing and requires a lot of talent. If you keep enough elements of the original for it to be recognisable and pass as a remix, then that shows large amounts of how the remixer can make so much out of so little.
Also, for progressive house and trance remixes of pop songs, it is certainally not something new. The Light (well known and very respected progressive house duo) have already remixed "I'm A Slave For You" by Britney Spears. Also in the mid 90's, Dekkard who was a well known producer of progressive trance and house remixed many non electronic tracks including Paula Cole and OMC and Brothers & Rhythm have done countless of them. Remixing something of a different style is IMO very interesting, especially if they manange to make something good out of something terrible.
If this is a real remix, then yes, I'll definitely take a listen. And no, I don't like Britney Spears either. |
nice!
finally someone salvages this thread from the shipwreck of shit opinions and flames.
___________________
Top 5:
1. R-Tem - Voiceless
2. New Order - Jetstream (Tom Neville Remix)
3. Pillow One - Ministry Of Love
4. Pulser - Point of Impact (Mike Koglin Remix)
5. Armin Van Buuren - Shivers (Christian Webber Mix)
|