|
| quote: | Originally posted by mike_stefan69
yes free advertising
instead of people finding out about this track 1 day before the release they now know about it 2/3 months or whatever the timescale for the release is |
Right, i rarely post here on TA (for numerous reasons, to which i'll not go into!). But i just had to make a comment on this thread, as i fear some of you have slightly wavered from the original point.
The quote above was to emphasise the fact that i feel you are making a very wrong statement there.
If record labels could get free advertising just like that, why do they employ people to market records!? What's more, the track isn't released for one sole purpose, and that purpose is because the track has been sent out to top DJs to create some buzz in sets, not to get distributed across the mp3 circuit!
The bottom line is, a track gets promo'd for a reason, that is to create buzz from big DJs. It then gets promoted via the label that has signed it using professionals who they employ, if advertising was as simple as you make out, everyone would be doing it that way.
I sincerely hope i'm not the only one in thinking these things, but the original point of this post has been completely lost in how scandelous mp3s are. The concern was for the point of the track being played by an unknown person, who was very much in the wrong for playing and promoting himself using an illegal track, which turned into concern because he was then distrubuting it. Whether people have this same file or not is pretty irrelavent to this post if i'm honest, because they weren't the one's being questioned!
|