 |
|
|
|
 |
VDub
Scoundrel

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by bluE_Neon
What? What is all that gibberish?
No, what was I thinking? My mistake, ofcourse, you are the smartest. My wisdome is like a shallow river compared to the waves of the ocean.
*Ties a nut to a rope
Here squirrel, there's a nut, you see it, it's in front of you, ugh, almost, just a little more, there you go. Back in your hole.
You be good and I'm bring you more nuts 
Check out UFC 1-4. Sick. |
You are whacked something fierce......
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by chinamon
chinamon is INCH MOAN.
LOL so fitting. |
|
|
Feb-24-2010 00:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
Jayx1
Prime Minister of TOTA
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Socialist People's Republic Of Canada
|
|
|
in yesterdays paper "mcguinty doesnt want to legalize MMA because he wants to retain the monopoly on beating up taxpayers"
LOL
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by jester
Everything in this country is illegal. |
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery…" Winston Churchill
"If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law" - Winston Churchill
|
|
Feb-24-2010 14:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
Orko
Digital Hippie

Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
|
|
For those saying, it is 'easy' to legalize, have you actually looked into what goes into legalizing something like MMA? I have not seen any legislative evidence in this thread to suggest anybody here has looked it up, other wise they probably would have posted it.
I am going to assume that it is like legalizing anything, in that it takes a tonne of legal work, financial research, medical research, setting up a governing body...etc. So it will take a shit load of work to get it going, not 'just a couple of votes' (even votes take a tonne of work to set up in parliament).
In the broad scheme of things, I agree with Jer, that we do have more pressing issues which should use our limited government resources.
The funniest thing is that Jay missed the key word in his own posting of the headline, "priority". So that means, that legalizing MMA won't happen because of xyz, but it won't happen now because abc is more important.
|
|
Feb-24-2010 21:30
|
|
|
 |
 |
jchung52
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by VDub
You are whacked something fierce...... |
jello
___________________
"Silly Clubbers, Docks are for Boats"
Soundcloud
|
|
Feb-24-2010 21:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
petro
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Ravist
I stand by my statement. I win, case closed. MMA is in fact, a sport. |
Welcome to last page.
| quote: | Originally posted by Orko
For those saying, it is 'easy' to legalize, have you actually looked into what goes into legalizing something like MMA? I have not seen any legislative evidence in this thread to suggest anybody here has looked it up, other wise they probably would have posted it.
I am going to assume that it is like legalizing anything, in that it takes a tonne of legal work, financial research, medical research, setting up a governing body...etc. So it will take a shit load of work to get it going, not 'just a couple of votes' (even votes take a tonne of work to set up in parliament).
In the broad scheme of things, I agree with Jer, that we do have more pressing issues which should use our limited government resources.
The funniest thing is that Jay missed the key word in his own posting of the headline, "priority". So that means, that legalizing MMA won't happen because of xyz, but it won't happen now because abc is more important. |
I agree with what you're saying and I'm sure that legalization of MMA is not just a matter of issuing a new print of the criminal code. However, where does that sort of reasoning stop? Why must we put things on the back-burner just because politicians decide that its not as important as things we all are supposed to feel strongly about (economy, health care, *added for dramatic effect* TERRORISM). Do we always have to wait for good times to be able to be entertained or enjoy ourselves?
I still believe that the reason why McGuinty chooses to avoid altering the criminal code is because he is truly fearful of it. Quebec is still subject to the same criminal code, but there MMA is legal due to their interpretation of the code. I think that the current Ontario government believes that changing the interpretation of the criminal code pertaining to prizefighting will open some sort of floodgates for other sorts of legalizations.
But the bottom line in this issue is - despite the Ontario government's motives, it shouldn't be up to them to cast MMA aside, it should be a decision of the people (no matter what the cost may be).
Last edited by petro on Feb-24-2010 at 23:34
|
|
Feb-24-2010 22:53
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:13.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|