quote:

Originally posted by sandstorm03 free

Yes, free on the internet.

quote:

Originally posted by Semirk Yes, free on the internet.

not really

___________________
Time exists so everything doesn't happen at once. Space exists so everything doesn't happen to you

quote:

Originally posted by sandstorm03 not really

Why not?

___________________
Latest releases:
Endless Cycles [Capital Heaven]
The Charlatan [Morphosis]

quote:

Originally posted by sandstorm03 not really

Ok, I really don't get where your coming from.

quote:

Originally posted by Semirk Ok, I really don't get where your coming from.

ooh sorry, i confused digi labels w/netlabels

___________________
Time exists so everything doesn't happen at once. Space exists so everything doesn't happen to you

quote:

Originally posted by Dumb_Dan Netlabels have nothing to do with "demo artists and beginners". Maybe you just found the poor ones out of the roughly 500 now existing and active netlabels?

yeah true, what i mainly ment that most of them are beginners (meaning composing for 1-3 years) and by demo artists i mean artists who aren't signed, i don't know what that term means to others?

and i know that there are A LOT of really good techno etc more marginal music netlabels, i was mainly talking about trance music, i don't think there are that much trance netlabels.

___________________
http://www.facebook.com/allendemusic

seems to be a pattern in this thred heh.

as far as my picks not impressing you guys, I'm sorry, I tried, and I still enjoy the things I've chosen. I kinda have this romantic view of how the whole netlabel world works, much like what semirk just posted. I don't remember the names of the linked pieces I enjoyed. What I do with my playlist rotation is kinda arrange it into groups, when I like something I'll move it into a higher group than where it goes when I first download it, so when I feel like listening to good stuff I'll play the elevated group and when I feel like exploring I'll play stuff in the group that hasn't been sifted through yet. Some of the things I've heard have made it into my elevated group, but I'm really bad with remembering all these names, so what I do is just "oooh that sounds pretty neat, clicky clicky".

I guess it is just different priorities, I find that I enjoy music that sounds like it has a little cheapness in it, there is just something really charming about shitty mikes, freeware synths, public domain samples, and vintage computer sounds that makes me happy. I like all the different sounds I hear, like I can't wrap a single stereotype around them the way one can do with EDM tunes. I don't listen for mastering and intricate sound design and alot of these other expensive tastes. So for Psy-T and people who share his same tase then I probably am a crappy censurer, I'm not listening to this stuff through a club system or a pair of monitors, just trying to have some fun with my shitty sound equipment and limited budget, because at this point in my life it's all I got.

I think a98 was refering to the paniq track in my sig, that guy is from the demoscene instead of a netlabel release, and alot of the demoscene kids are ameteurs, but I am a big fan of paniq, he's a really thoughtful guy.

I've only found like 3 trancey tunes on all the stuff ive been through so far, I'm not missing it much TBH, plenty of hypnotic patterns and unusual sounds to keep me entertained..

Hey guys. I don't post that much on forums anymore, but this actually seemed like a very interesting subject and I'd just like to share my view. The way I see it there is both a very positive as well as a very negative side to the rise of digital labels.

The extra exposure artists get through digital distribution (with the scene heavily relying on the internet these days) and the ease of being able to get good quality music without even having to leave home are obvious advantages. Also the money that is made of digital releases is very welcome, as vinyl just tends to break even these days. I noticed some comments about MP3 sales being no match for the money that should be made of vinyl, but as far as my experience stretches that is not true. Sites like Beatport sell more than a thousand copies of popular tracks, which is definitely a welcome income on top of vinyl sales / compilation profits. Not entirely sure how that translates to digital trance sales but proper house / progressive tracks definitely make the label a good amount of money through digital distribution.

The negative trend we're seeing lately is indeed, as mentioned before, new digital only labels releasing the rejected tracks of larger labels or digital labels launched specifically to put out a large number of 'low-quality' releases. Looking beyond quality, a large portion of these labels do not even have the contacts nor the experience to make these releases a succes. The only way these labels can stand out from the mass is by having a good promotion list. The advantage of having the distribution take care of vinyl promotion is obviously not there, forcing the label to do their own promotion.
Having ten internet DJs play a track is *not* proper promotion the way I see it. Good promotion is getting a track directly to all the big names out there; being in personal contact with known DJs and producers around the globe. That is something a lot of these labels lack, getting that kind of relation requires a long term basis in the scene as well as experience. Just putting a track up on Beatport or any other digital download store for that matter is not the way to do a release.

Then there is also the issue of sound quality. I receive quite a lot of promo material and I am time and time again surprised by tracks that totally lack mastering or just sound bad in general. Mastering is something that costs money and thus is 'saved' on, but mastering is also essential!! If the track does not sound right over speakers at home, without a doubt it will sound like shit in a club.

The above problem with mastering is also the result of tracks getting picked up easier. Music used to be a more professional business, only the people that had the time and money to invest in their hobby (and equipment) got the 'privilege' of releasing a track on vinyl. With the more digital era we are in these days everyone with a personal computer can download software and start to produce music. Not much thought is given to essential requirements such as monitor speakers, studio acoustics, etc etc, which results in the large portion of average and badly sounding tracks we are seeing right now.

The negative impact on the vinyl industry is also a consequence of the blooming digital era. However, I do not think this is something that can be changed, I believe it to be something natural. Vinyl will run out anyway with the rising oil price and the shortages, it is only a matter of time. The industry does not stop evolving and CD's and digital downloads are simply the next step in music distribution. Labels should take full advantage of that. Fortunately sites such as Beatport are already filtering heavily on 'bad' labels. More sites are getting more selective in what they offer for download which is a very good thing. In time this will definitely reduce the amount of crap which is flooding the scene right now.

Just my 2 cents
Eelke

___________________
I don't know why I smoke, but I drink to get drunk

http://www.eelkekleijn.nl/

Very nice post, Eelke, I appreciate your views.

___________________
Latest releases:
Endless Cycles [Capital Heaven]
The Charlatan [Morphosis]

quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Mystery Very nice post, Eelke, I appreciate your views.

Agreed. Well informed post.

___________________
M.I.K.E. IS GOD