 |
|
|
|
 |
colonelcrisp
Isn't Batshit Crazy

Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Ottawa
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by squirrelly
The way you worded your first question means that you recognize that there could be feelings from one person to another, just maybe not both simultaneously. If you are asking if two people would be able to practice self restraint until they die and never cross any boundaries - 50/50 chance. By no means was I implying that self restraint could not be practiced - it's the idea that all these friendships are considered "platonic" that I had issues agreeing with. imho, a friendship cannot be platonic if one has feelings for the other. BUT you did not word your question as "can two people stay platonic friends through the course of a lifetime", so I am happy.
Is it worth it to keep feelings aside to maintain a friendship? Depends on whether or not the other person is truly happy with their SO. If yes, then yes - worth keeping feelings to yourself but continuing on with the companionship of a friendship. If the other person seems miserable, take a chance and let them know that you're lusting to bang them. And then maybe try out a relationship if the shagging is good. |
totally agree, or just get horribly drunk and let the bad decisions begin!
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
I have 3 hobbies: gaming, DJing & correcting maladjusted fools on the internet. |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Yeah, I’d like to know what horrible, scarring incident in your childhood turned you into such an ignorant, intellectual-hating philistine? |
|
|
Apr-14-2009 15:59
|
|
|
 |
 |
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by squirrelly
The way you worded your first question means that you recognize that there could be feelings from one person to another, just maybe not both simultaneously. If you are asking if two people would be able to practice self restraint until they die and never cross any boundaries - 50/50 chance. By no means was I implying that self restraint could not be practiced - it's the idea that all these friendships are considered "platonic" that I had issues agreeing with. imho, a friendship cannot be platonic if one has feelings for the other. BUT you did not word your question as "can two people stay platonic friends through the course of a lifetime", so I am happy.  |
I totally agree, "platonic" is being thrown around way too much. Plato was sort of a dickbag anyways, but that's beside the point...
| quote: | | Is it worth it to keep feelings aside to maintain a friendship? Depends on whether or not the other person is truly happy with their SO. If yes, then yes - worth keeping feelings to yourself but continuing on with the companionship of a friendship. If the other person seems miserable, take a chance and let them know that you're lusting to bang them. And then maybe try out a relationship if the shagging is good. |
Though I personally completely agree with this approach, I think it's interesting to consider how one would be invalidating the feelings of a friend were you to utterly deny reciprocation. Of course it's not to be expected that you jump right into bed with any of your friends who express sexual attraction, regardless of your own feelings or circumstances, merely because they're your friend - but just the same, many friendships are completely lost once one blurts out their true feelings for the other. And this seems sort of unnecessary. We are each of us animals, and often at the whim of our biology - of course we can control our sexual escapades, but I do not think we can necessarily control just who our nature decides is a worthy candidate for our reproductive urges, and that this is an all-to underestimated factor when it comes to arguments like this.
I think where most people are probably getting hung up on this concept is in separating sex and love/companionship, because they really aren't necessarily the same thing. I mean, a friend coming out and telling you they want to fuck you is totally one thing - a friend coming out and saying they have loved you for years and want to spend the rest of their lives with you is understandably horrifying, especially when they are about a thousand rungs down your ladder.
As always though, there is no general rule to unify every situation here. Sexual attraction is utterly subjective (if we even have a choice in the matter), and "friendship" attraction is just as subjective, but on an antirely different level of consideration. When people cannot seperate these, irreconcilable problems will occurr - but if we have so little choice in the matter, where do we even begin saying there are "rules" to attraction and friendship?
jennypie version: UGG, UGG, SEXY FREND GUD, UGLY FREND NO GUD, NO SEXY
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
|
|
Apr-14-2009 16:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
squirrelly
The Phun Nun

Registered: Oct 2003
Location: In the Shower
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
I totally agree, "platonic" is being thrown around way too much. Plato was sort of a dickbag anyways, but that's beside the point...
Though I personally completely agree with this approach, I think it's interesting to consider how one would be invalidating the feelings of a friend were you to utterly deny reciprocation. Of course it's not to be expected that you jump right into bed with any of your friends who express sexual attraction, regardless of your own feelings or circumstances, merely because they're your friend - but just the same, many friendships are completely lost once one blurts out their true feelings for the other. And this seems sort of unnecessary. We are each of us animals, and often at the whim of our biology - of course we can control our sexual escapades, but I do not think we can necessarily control just who our nature decides is a worthy candidate for our reproductive urges, and that this is an all-to underestimated factor when it comes to arguments like this.
I think where most people are probably getting hung up on this concept is in separating sex and love/companionship, because they really aren't necessarily the same thing. I mean, a friend coming out and telling you they want to fuck you is totally one thing - a friend coming out and saying they have loved you for years and want to spend the rest of their lives with you is understandably horrifying, especially when they are about a thousand rungs down your ladder.
As always though, there is no general rule to unify every situation here. Sexual attraction is utterly subjective (if we even have a choice in the matter), and "friendship" attraction is just as subjective, but on an antirely different level of consideration. When people cannot seperate these, irreconcilable problems will occurr - but if we have so little choice in the matter, where do we even begin saying there are "rules" to attraction and friendship?
jennypie version: UGG, UGG, SEXY FREND GUD, UGLY FREND NO GUD, NO SEXY |
See, but I think that was where I was going with my ramblings. Could you honestly say that it is a "true" friendship, if when feelings were expressed, one person or the other abandoned the friendship? Then that is not a true companionship and friendship. When a friend stopped and said to me "I have loved you for 13 years", I stopped, contemplated the idea of the two of us being together, and then decided from there that although he meant a lot to me, he did not possess the qualities of what I was looking for in a SO. I told him this, but insisted that although I was flattered, we stay friends. At this point he agreed and then within a month, I never heard from him again.
So would you consider this person a true friend? No - it was a fraudulent friendship. Same things goes for when Jamie said if a guy wanted to bone her she would say that everything was fine until that moment. Friendships are based on the premises that they are relationships, minus the sex. When someone is staying in a friendship while trying to maintain their feelings as dormant, how can one really say they are a true friend? You can't.
There are moments when "best friends" look at each other and say "oh my God! I have loved you all of this time!" and they end up trying out a relationship. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
The "rules" are man-made, and the consequences the same.
|
|
Apr-14-2009 17:13
|
|
|
 |
 |
elFreak
Blood Diamonds and Salsa

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: With Juan Pachanga Eating Tacos. Ah Ha Si Mi Gusta.
|
|
|
Apr-14-2009 18:10
|
|
|
 |
 |
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast
|
|
|
Well what constitutes a "true" friendship not only varies between person to person, but - I think - between the sexes. Given, there are exceptions to most every individual, but in general, men weigh the value of a friendship in terms of cost and benefit - as they do with most everything. If the cost exceeds the benefit, you're probably not much a friend, or at least not for much longer. Women are automatically more "beneficial" as friends to men in this respect, because they tend to start out with a more desireable biology (of course depending on your sexual preference).
Women however, tend to weigh their relationships based on an emotional leverage. It is both a simpler, yet more individually-refined process that determines who a woman befriends, and, as well, who she is willing to sleep with. But that is of course not to say that any side is better or worse than another - just different.
With that difference in mind though, is it much surprise that it so often doesn't pan out after first impressions have been processed? To men, both cost and benefit are liable to change along specific actions - a woman could become more beneficial should she consent to sexual relations... but a man does not necessarily and suddenly become more valuable to a woman should he want sex from her - if anything, he is threatening his image with her on a emotional level, and that isn't really beneficial to anybody.
As Astroboy said - it's completely possible, given the maturity level. I would add that as a people becomes more mature though, it's not only possible - it's probable.
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
|
|
Apr-14-2009 18:11
|
|
|
 |
 |
elFreak
Blood Diamonds and Salsa

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: With Juan Pachanga Eating Tacos. Ah Ha Si Mi Gusta.
|
|
|
Apr-14-2009 18:30
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:31.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|