 |
|
|
|
 |
PivotTechno
senseless

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Citizen, World
|
|
|
Apr-18-2010 04:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
PivotTechno
senseless

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Citizen, World
|
|
|
Ah, well as mentioned in passing somewhere earlier in this thread, addiction is addiction is addiction, with the only difference between these various addictions is the degree of social acceptability. Mate states so himself in the vid posted back on page two. You can argue otherwise, but you'll be incorrect.
| quote: | Originally posted by Spam
Some of those addicts were probably just curious about what the drugs did, and got hooked. |
Yeah man...I'd just come home from putting in my volunteer time at the community garden and was about to pick up the kids from daycare, when the thought suddenly entered my mind, "I wonder what it would be like to try some nice, clean horse?" Shit went straight downhill from there, let me tell you!
Glad you thought the picture was funny. Ima go STFU now.
___________________
4a.m.deepdarksweatypulsingwarehousemusic
WestsideWax Soundcloud
WestsideWax Mixcloud
New! WestsideWax Archives
|
|
Apr-18-2010 06:14
|
|
|
 |
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
Apr-18-2010 15:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by PivotTechno
Just how many times does this have to be repeated, exactly? |
You can repeat it as many times as you want, but it won't suddenly lose its flaws.
There is no "tangible" definition for "the spirit of a child" because you must first enter into a massive debate about what exactly the fuck a "spirit" is, and I assure you there's no nice and clean end to that debate. Then when you've come up with your subjective, ideological and controversial definition of a child's spirit you can start figuring out what exactly constitutes "disrespect" thereof, and indeed what constitutes respect in the first place. And while you're at it, you should probably figure out exactly where we place the end of childhood, the point of transition between being a child and being an adult, and then come to a nice and clean conclusion about the transitive and temporal state of childhood in the first place.
Basically, it looks very much to me as though you've got an incredibly malleable non-definition forming the bedrock of his entire theory which can conveniently encompass just about anything to justify just about anything, the kind of self-affirming begging of the question that forms the basis of many a cult, and yet because he tells you it's "simple" you don't even think about it. That's the route to enlightenment, I suppose.
___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24
Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/
|
|
Apr-18-2010 18:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
PivotTechno
senseless

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Citizen, World
|
|
|
And therin lies the problem. Much easier to debate concepts until your bones are brittle and nothing's been accomplished, than to work toward grasping them on a level that goes deeper than what you can view with even the most powerful atomic microscope.
And yes, you're right - the mind does love to complicate things to the point of throwing walls up around the truth. Great example is Vipassana meditation, which I mentioned earlier. The basis for this particular kind of meditation is to do away with preferences - non-duality, all things being equal, however you wish to phrase it. And yet time and time again, I've watched students go up before the course teacher and exclaim, "This morning my meditation was so good! I was so happy and blissful, and then when I sat this afternoon, I had a horrible meditation, so much pain and discomfort." Even though it's gently drilled into their heads over and over that regardless of pain or bliss there is no good or bad meditation, that it simply is, the concept is too simple for their cluttered and complicated minds to grasp and they will continue to protest to the contrary until they are blue in the face.
So yes, some things just are that simple, and both Mate and Mackler have come to the same conclusion about the abuse/addiction connection through years of careful observation of others as well as deep, honest introspection into their own condition. Can you say you have the same under your belt to back up your own conclusions, or are you just speaking off the top of your head, time and time again?
___________________
4a.m.deepdarksweatypulsingwarehousemusic
WestsideWax Soundcloud
WestsideWax Mixcloud
New! WestsideWax Archives
|
|
Apr-18-2010 19:43
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:52.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|