quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Even my aquaintances in the OTO, Golden Dawn, and the handful of masons I know admit 9-11 was an inside job. LOL, you guys are fucking retarded.

i want what youre smoking shaolin!

___________________

Have you guys seen this movie called ZEITGEIST? I watched it a few days ago,lots of interesting points,but most of them have been told by many others in the past.I liked the part 3 of the movie myself the most.

Anyways here is the link:
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by hardcore trancer Have you guys seen this movie called ZEITGEIST? I watched it a few days ago,lots of interesting points,but most of them have been told by many others in the past.I liked the part 3 of the movie myself the most. Anyways here is the link: [[ LINK REMOVED ]]

i read the synopsis a week or two ago. full of the repetitive fallacies that characterise the "truth" movement.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN i want what youre smoking shaolin!

CIA imported crack!

___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." -Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN i read the synopsis a week or two ago. full of the repetitive fallacies that characterise the "truth" movement.

When/if you get the chance watch the part 3 of the movie,I thought it was very informative.It definetly makes you look at the whole idea of a war in a different way which is very cool.

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN yes i have. and yes, it is interesting. but something like this cannot stand up to the counter evidence. you know, bodies, wreckage, the destroyed lightposts on the approach vector, the hundreds of witnesses that saw the plane crash etc. or the very same blackbox they got from the pentagon has the accuracy of the blackbox been verified? i dont know enough about blackboxes and how accurate they are to make a judgement. i am however pretty good at plain old reading, and hundreds of witnesses cannot be wrong to such a degree. especially those that witnessed the flight passing within metres of their car

I didn't want to debate 911 in that thread

Anyways,

The quality of data should not be a matter of concern. Black boxes are meant to withstand heavy crashes like these. The government simulations were reconstructed from the same data. The question is, whether the members of this organization were qualified enough to read the flight data recorder. On the surface atleast, it looks like they may have done a good job. The government should respond and counter their claims with sound technical analysis. That is the only way to counter conspiracy theories : You respond to any fresh claim of conspiracy. I really don't care what people have seen and reported. People have seen UFOs and they will swear by it. I don't really know what to say about the derbies and stuff because half of the people claim to have seen them and the other half claims not to have seen much.

Hard engineering analysis > Witness testimonies.

___________________

Download and review ! Omega_M - In the Mix (Beta Version)

Originally posted by twilightki : It feels like something you'd listen to at 4 in the morning, or listen to in your car while you're going in a tunnel.

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_M I didn't want to debate 911 in that thread Anyways, The quality of data should not be a matter of concern. Black boxes are meant to withstand heavy crashes like these. The government simulations were reconstructed from the same data. The question is, whether the members of this organization were qualified enough to read the flight data recorder. On the surface atleast, it looks like they may have done a good job. The government should respond and counter their claims with sound technical analysis. That is the only way to counter conspiracy theories : You respond to any fresh claim of conspiracy. I really don't care what people have seen and reported. People have seen UFOs and they will swear by it. I don't really know what to say about the derbies and stuff because half of the people claim to have seen them and the other half claims not to have seen much.

actually, there really is NO way to combat conspiracies. this is because they are born and thrive with arguments from doubt- which are pretty hard to undermine. basically because there will always be doubt in lots of situations, especially those that engender panic and misinformation on a day like sept 2001, those that want to can point at all sorts of things that cannot be explained. but not explaining does not equal conspiracy.

i have yet to see an explanation for the data recording evidence that explains the supposed anomalies. so i cant really make my own assessment yet. but i will point out that this particular black box coincidentally ends at the same time the plane didn't hit the pentagon. and was found in the debris at the pentagon. instead of JUST pointing at the discrepancies regarding the black box, id like to see a valid reason for this as well

quote:

Hard engineering analysis > Witness testimonies.

yes and no. people are familiar with passenger airlines. people are familiar with the pentagon. hundreds of people saw the passenger airline hit the pentagon. im willing to trust the judgement of hundreds of people in a situation where your average person can be expected to recognise the core facts.

this example is a multitude of difference from those witnesses that heard "explosions" around the WTCs (for obvious reasons).

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN yes and no. people are familiar with passenger airlines. people are familiar with the pentagon. hundreds of people saw the passenger airline hit the pentagon. im willing to trust the judgement of hundreds of people in a situation where your average person can be expected to recognise the core facts.

If thats the case then why cant the government provide us will all the security videos from the area from the day that pentagon got hit? I mean after all many people saw the plane crashing right?so why cant they share the videos with everyone?

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by hardcore trancer If thats the case then why cant the government provide us will all the security videos from the area from the day that pentagon got hit? I mean after all many people saw the plane crashing right?so why cant they share the videos with everyone?

i keep asking this question: can you provide me with evidence that the government does actually possess any footage of the plane hitting? people seem to make this assumption, but i am yet to see anything approaching fact that they do.

in any case, instead of arguing from a position of doubt, the CTers have much much bigger problems! like what happened to the plane, passengers, where the debris came from etc. id start there before making questionable assumptions about video footage

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN i keep asking this question: can you provide me with evidence that the government does actually possess any footage of the plane hitting? people seem to make this assumption, but i am yet to see anything approaching fact that they do.

If they dont posses these footages then who has them? or are you sayind that those footages dont even exist to begin with?

quote:

in any case, instead of arguing from a position of doubt, the CTers have much much bigger problems! like what happened to the plane, passengers, where the debris came from etc. id start there before making questionable assumptions about video footage

Try watching that documantry movie that I posted here the other day.Iam not saying they are right or wrong but they do have a interesting arguments on some of the issues that you mentioned.

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by hardcore trancer If they dont posses these footages then who has them? or are you sayind that those footages dont even exist to begin with?

precisely. i have not seen an iota of evidence to suggest there is any more footage. and i have asked those in this thread to provide me with something and im still waiting...

quote:

Originally posted by hardcore trancer Try watching that documantry movie that I posted here the other day.Iam not saying they are right or wrong but they do have a interesting arguments on some of the issues that you mentioned.

sorry mate, but after reading the synopsis im just not interested. how can i take anything in it seriously when it advertises itself with known fallacies?

___________________

I think the minnesota bridge collapse can hopefully shed some common sense on to some of you as to the nature of strucutral failure. While the NTSB hasnt begun their forensic analysis yet, my first hunch is that the structure lost stability due to the deck rehabilitation on the outer lanes of the freeway. Anyway, point being, that structure fell at "near freefall speeds" (i thought i should quote some of your rhetoric) and without any warning. Just goes to show you that because you have never seen it on tv before doesnt mean it cant happen.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN I have 3 hobbies: gaming, DJing & correcting maladjusted fools on the internet.

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN Yeah, I’d like to know what horrible, scarring incident in your childhood turned you into such an ignorant, intellectual-hating philistine?