|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Give it up man. No matter how demonstrably you equivocate that Rezko and Obama were in criminal cahoots, there's no evidence of that. Rezko was a scoundrel - it didn't mean Obama contributed to any illicit activity, and it doesn't mean that he was aware of any of it in 2004. The indictments were all after that fact.
Same with ACORN. You can't slime someone for being friends in Elementary school with someone who went on to rob a bank when he was 30.
It's common sense, man. But being the partisan that you are, I wouldn't expect that from you. So are you done with this crap, or are you going to keep harping on a point that doesn't make sense? |
haha you're not partisan? Rezko was indicted and convicted for the things he did up until 2004... when he was contributing to Obama's campaign. Anyway you're missing my point the whole time. I never said Obama should face criminal charges too or be indicted... I'm explaining the pattern of behavior with his associations. Don't you think associations matter? Would you be friends with, for example, a rapist who said that shit happened in his past and he's not that kind of person anymore? I doubt it.
|
