|
| quote: | Originally posted by Sand Leaper
Because in this case making a genre popular means watering it down and simplifying it for mass appeal. |
Simplifying it? How is modern trance any simpler than classic trance? Classic trance is very simplistic and repetitive. Epic trance actually has more musical merit than classic trance. For all the talk of pop melodies and pop elements (as if breakdowns are pop), everyone fails to realise that this actually could be a good thing. Classic trance is unrefined, rough and in a lot of cases very weak music. It may have cut the mustard in 1992, but thirteen years and countless musical and technological developments since, it sounds very dated. Some of it still works, some doesn't.
It's ridiculous to assume that all breakdowns are bad, all melodies are pop and that all classic trance was good. A lot of it was absolute shite, just as a lot of modern trance is.
Anyone who thinks that melodies are bad things is obviously a very boring sod indeed. Not all epic trance melodies are massive, not all of them are pop and some of them are very subtle indeed. Ishkur's argument that it demeans the real meaning of trance is partially acceptable (although the progressive scene still maintains traditional trance values, so why not just ignore epic trance if you don't like anthems?), but anyone who wasn't listening to trance pre 97 or who has ever enjoyed epic trance is just being an elitist prick if they try to pass that argument off.
___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24
Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/
|