 |
|
|
|
 |
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
I am the correct authority actually. The power of my government is in me and the electorate. Not with the president, not with the Congress, but with me and the American people. And it is clear the American people are done with Iraq. Therefore, the government has an obligation to fulfill the will of the people, and withdraw from that wretched country. |
not really. If every decision were up to you or the american people we would frequently have referendums on every major decision. Instead, we elect people we feel represent us well. to the extent they don't represent us well, we have the power to elect someone who will in the next election cycle. that is the extent of your decision making capabilities. don't get it twisted thinking your will is any more important than electing your next representative. it's utterly ridiculous when people think that elected representatives are bound by the will of the people in the decision making process. your power over government is only your vote, and that is your only guaranteed say in our government.
in any event, the will of the people is not the best barometer for a correct decision. the people usually aren't privileged to all relevant information, and most certainly are unaware of current events and more importantly the consequences of major decisions with respect to current events. this shouldn't be taken that i don't think democracies work because i certainly do. however, the point is that the average person is unprepared to make important decisions and we shouldn't expect them to make the correct decision in this regard; that is the entire reason we have career politicians. for better or worse, these are the people we trust to make the right choices on our behalf because we expect them to spend their entire work-day studying issues we can't because we too have jobs. Nevertheless, they don't have an obligation to do what you want. if they choose a different path your only recourse is to change your vote.
|
|
Oct-26-2008 01:11
|
|
|
 |
 |
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23

Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by jerZ07002
not really. If every decision were up to you or the american people we would frequently have referendums on every major decision. Instead, we elect people we feel represent us well. to the extent they don't represent us well, we have the power to elect someone who will in the next election cycle. that is the extent of your decision making capabilities. don't get it twisted thinking your will is any more important than electing your next representative. it's utterly ridiculous when people think that elected representatives are bound by the will of the people in the decision making process. your power over government is only your vote, and that is your only guaranteed say in our government. |
Not every major decision. Referendums would do a lot to curtail Congressional deadlock. If the parties can't decide, let the people...
| quote: | | in any event, the will of the people is not the best barometer for a correct decision. the people usually aren't privileged to all relevant information, and most certainly are unaware of current events and more importantly the consequences of major decisions with respect to current events. this shouldn't be taken that i don't think democracies work because i certainly do. however, the point is that the average person is unprepared to make important decisions and we shouldn't expect them to make the correct decision in this regard; that is the entire reason we have career politicians. for better or worse, these are the people we trust to make the right choices on our behalf because we expect them to spend their entire work-day studying issues we can't because we too have jobs. Nevertheless, they don't have an obligation to do what you want. if they choose a different path your only recourse is to change your vote. |
Ahh, reminds me of the Crito; Socrates believes public opinion is not important to the decision because the many's ignorance does not allow them to have true choice, and therefore their opinions are of no value.
While somewhat true, remember that only those who care actually vote. The majority of the ignorant masses don't vote, and so they don't have a say. The same would be true for referendums. I rather believe bottom up governance should hold as much sway as top down governance. The previous 7 years has proven what unfettered top down governance could do to a country.
___________________
|
|
Nov-01-2008 04:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Not every major decision. Referendums would do a lot to curtail Congressional deadlock. If the parties can't decide, let the people...
Ahh, reminds me of the Crito; Socrates believes public opinion is not important to the decision because the many's ignorance does not allow them to have true choice, and therefore their opinions are of no value.
While somewhat true, remember that only those who care actually vote. The majority of the ignorant masses don't vote, and so they don't have a say. The same would be true for referendums. I rather believe bottom up governance should hold as much sway as top down governance. The previous 7 years has proven what unfettered top down governance could do to a country. |
on the way home from the office tonight i saw a great sticker i think you would appreciate. the sticker had the republican elephant at the top and below that it said, "trickle down democracy," with the elephanat pissing on the word democracy. I tried searching for that image on google but i couldn't find it.
|
|
Nov-01-2008 04:20
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23

Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
that's looking at the trees and not the forest though. the progress can't be denied... I know this because the media has been quiet about Iraq for a while now. I mean, you know there are murders in Chicago every day but that doesn't mean the Chicago PD or the mayor have failed in making the city worth living in/visiting. |
There aren't bombs going off everyday in Chicago. Over 60 people died this week of violence, just violence, not natural causes, violence, in Baghdad alone. I don't see that as progress. The political structure of the country is still very much in question, and I don't believe for one second Iraq could become a liberal democracy, or bastion of freedom, whatever the propaganda machine likes to say. Iraq's constitution itself states that Islam is the supreme law of the land. Please, point to me, one country, which is truly free, in which Islam is the law of the land. Because I haven't found one...
___________________
|
|
Nov-12-2008 05:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:27.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|