|
| quote: | Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I'm just puzzled by the idea that any significant number of people have a "faith" or "spirituality" whose content floats free of any organized religious tradition. I think that idea is obviously false. People who have spiritual practices might reject many aspects of what they call "organized religion," and they might not go to any churches or temples, but they will still be indebted to the religions they reject for most of their ideas about spiritual beings, practices, and concepts. |
I see what you mean, and this really rings true if you come from a a place where the religion is heavily embedded in the culture.Even if you choose to be agnostic, you can't escape all the traditions and customs. It may be something as small as taking a free-kick and unconciously letting out a prayer to score. Some cultures are so dependant on religion, that if taken away, would leave the people with no means to cope with anything.
Its hard to ever know if these ideas are pragmatic ones, and if we were to have been raised in isolation, would these ideas of faith still come to us? Obviously specific rituals like meditation are learned, but I still beleive there is an innate part of us that seeks faith in something beyond the 5 senses. Sprituality came before organized religion. Nowadays, however, its exceedingly difficuly to practice faith that is completely free from the influence of the organized influence, even if its on a subconcious level.
|