 |
|
|
|
 |
jdat
Jay Van Dat

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: I dont even know
|
|
|
Dec-30-2007 08:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sushipunk
Flickering, I roam

Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Chateau Verdafloor
|
|
|
Dec-30-2007 08:40
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
gehzumteufel
In your ass

Registered: Nov 2005
Location: so cal
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by jdat
what's worse is I never take the time to actually look at my pics ...
I dump the cards and never look at the stuff 
yeah well 9k pics ain't that much in the digital era tbh 
this evening my brother in law comes back from shooting a wedding with my sister and asks me to bet how many pics they took .... I said 1600
they shot 2900+ pics in 13 hours
no facebook but people keep telling me sign up sign up ... sh*t myspace already keeps me too busy as it is ( and not necessarily in a good way ).
and the lens. Well it's the cheapest money can buy but also the sharpest and brightest. Oh sweet irony.
I have tried shooting with other lenses that cost 700-1500 $ and I couldn't handle the barreling vignetting etc ... and I find them too freaking heavy
I have one of these right here with me and it's a monster. Too freaking heavy
[IMG].http://www.microglobe.co.uk/catalog/images/nikon_70-200mm_f2.8_vr_lens.jpg[/IMG] |
holy shit! thats a lot of pics in 13hrs! fawk!
gay...facebook is much easier to maintain and less bullshit.
haha yeah thats why i said nice lens. f1.8 is really nice. good low light shots to boot.
haha that is a monster, but as you said heavy as fuck. and seriously, telephoto lenses are a waste unless your really looking for that long shot. most of the time people dont even have that long shot let alone have the need for that much zoom.
| quote: | Originally posted by Sushipunk
Drooooool.
I use a Canon 20D and a Canon 400D, with a 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, and a 100mm f/2.8 USM macro.
I really want a big fucker L lens, but can't afford it just now And, like you said, so damn heavy. Going for a holiday soon that will involve a lot of hiking (bird photography), so an L lens would suck to carry around.
But the pics...
Shit |
L series lenses are god awful expensive. but you seem to have a couple good lenses there already. are they efs or ef lenses?
| quote: | Originally posted by jdat
it's a killer yeah
My bro in law and sister don't use it anymore because they switched to Canon a year ago. Perhaps they'll donate it to me... haha
they have two Canon 5Ds ... countless lenses, high end flashes and some minimal studio gear.
Ridiculous..... |
HAHAHAHAHA *heres to hoping*
| quote: | Originally posted by Sushipunk
Mmmm, 5D's are niiiice.
Haha, yeah I hear you though.
If only I had $20,000 to spend on photography gear.
One day! |
a friend of mine recently upgraded to the 30d. then one of his photography gigs, the guy asked if he had a fish eye lens. he didnt. and since fish eye lenses look horridly fisheyed on a non full frame he upgraded to a 5d. he already had fucking badass shots. now they are just insane. youve prolly seen them. www.rukes.com
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by bas
Dual exhaust tips on dual exhaust = QUAD EXHAUST = 300 gain in horsepower. Duh |
| quote: | Originally posted by bas
Undies with a dickhole aren't good for guys. Your balls can get caught in them. That's why I prefer to go over the gate instead of through the fence. |
|
|
Dec-30-2007 15:07
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:22.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|